Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,672 results for subject:Devolution

Subject X
Constituencies

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Constituencies (2,672)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the publication on 16 December 2024 of the English Devolution White Paper, whether they intend to retain ceremonial counties for the purposes of appointing Lord Lieutenants and High Sheriffs.

Asked by
Baroness Eaton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2025
Reference
HL5592
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answer of 20 January 2025 to Question 24239 on Local Government: Constituencies, whether he plans to review the (a) size, (b) boundaries, (c) names and (d) number of ceremonial counties.

Asked by
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
31934
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of proposals within the English Devolution White Paper on the (a) borders and (b) status of ceremonial counties.

Asked by
Alicia Kearns (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2025
Reference
24239
House
House of Commons

Clause 12 agreed to. Government new clause 1 (Registers used to determine the “electorate” in relation to the 2023 reports), discussed with new clause 4 (Definition of “electorate”), agreed to. New clause 2 (Electorate per constituency) negatived on division (7 votes to 10). New clause 3 (Allocation of constituencies), discussed...

Lead member
Chloe Smith
Answering member
Cat Smith
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Parliamentary Constituencies Bill Committee
Date
30 June 2020
House
House of Commons

Examination of witnesses. Written evidence reported to the House.

Lead member
Chloe Smith
Answering member
Cat Smith
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Parliamentary Constituencies Bill Committee
Date
23 June 2020
House
House of Commons

I completely agree with my hon. Friend.

Brexit legislation is passing through Parliament and we are undergoing one of the most significant constitutional changes in decades. We have already seen from our debates on Henry VIII provisions that Ministers will always attempt to extend their powers. At this point, we must...

Member
Afzal Khan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 cc588-590
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says we finished them off, but I do not think we quite did that, as there are still some of them left. I am amazed that none of them have troubled themselves to come to Parliament to debate this constitutional matter.

I come to the last couple of...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 cc607-8
House
House of Commons

I will not give way.

As our great nation prepares to leave the European Union, the need for parliamentary scrutiny—I know that it is unfashionable on the Government Benches, where Members will not even take part in Opposition day votes—has never been greater. We are also, as we have heard, losing...

Member
Andrew Gwynne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 cc609-610
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, for providing that clarification.

I am new to Parliament, but I have been in politics for decades, and in that time, I have seen trust in our political system erode. Today, only 20% of...

Member
Afzal Khan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 cc587-8
House
House of Commons

I was the Minister who tried to bring in a Bill to ensure that the House of Lords was elected, and of course it was because the Labour party would not support the programme motion that we were not able to make any progress. On the hon. Gentleman’s point about...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c588
House
House of Commons

I understand what the right hon. Gentleman is saying, but the bottom line is that if are trying to reduce cost, why are the Government putting more and more unelected people into the House of Lords, and appointing more and more special advisers? It does not make sense. I would...

Member
Afzal Khan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c588
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend accept what the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee said in 2015: if the Government of the day got their way—this Government are trying again—it would break all locational links and completely undermine the representational basis of this House? That would be a very sad day.

Member
David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c588
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, for calling me to speak in this very important debate. I congratulate the hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton (Afzal Khan) on being the promoter of a Bill on such an important issue, and on his excellent and passionate speech setting out some of the arguments...

Member
Lucy Allan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c590
House
House of Commons

We have a responsibility to reduce the cost of politics. If it is not in our powers to control the costs of the other place, we should still seek to reduce the cost of this place.

Member
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c590
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I think we all agree that the cost of politics should be reduced, and there are ways in which we can do that, but as Members of this place democracy is the first principle we are duty-bound to uphold.

The current proposals do not achieve...

Member
Lucy Allan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 cc590-1
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is making an incredibly important point. The population of Edinburgh is exploding, but the number of constituencies is going down. That surely means that the boundary changes are making this place less representative, rather than more.

Member
Ian Murray (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c591
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a really important point.

Many Members represent constituencies with a high level of unregistered voters, but the Boundary Commission is not prepared to take them into consideration. Very often, those in most need of representation are not registered to vote. I normally have my constituency surgeries on...

Member
Lucy Allan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c591
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady not agree that it is better to represent a large constituency in a single unitary authority area, rather than trying to represent a smaller constituency, as set out in the current Boundary Commission proposals, that straddles two borough areas with double the number of borough chief...

Member
Ruth Cadbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c591
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes a very important point. That is just one of the flaws with the current process that needs to be addressed.

As the chair of the all-party group on new towns, I want to talk about rapidly growing towns. Indeed, the process needs to recognise the changing demographics...

Member
Lucy Allan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c592
House
House of Commons

Local boundary commissions are allowed to take into account predictions of population growth and census data. Does the hon. Lady agree that it would be important to allow that for parliamentary boundary commissions?

Member
Lloyd Russell-Moyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2017
Reference
632 c592
House
House of Commons