Skip to main content

1-20 of 538 results for subject:Modernisation

Subject X
Contracts

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Contracts (538)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government when they will award contracts under Programme EUSTON.

Asked by
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
HL13082
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
12 October 2020
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee
Date
19 May 2020
Reference
HC 382 2019-21
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
HC 247 2019
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. This morning, a written statement has been released by the Ministry of Defence on the modernising defence programme. It says very little apart from warm words and platitudes, but the issue of great interest across the defence estate is when we are...

Member
Madeleine Moon (Labour)
Type
Points of order
Date
19 July 2018
Reference
645 c625
House
House of Commons

Sixteenth opposition day debate (part two). Motion that this House recognises the important contribution of the defence industry to the UK. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Nia Griffith
Answering member
Tobias Ellwood
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Opposition days
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 cc1027-1076
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House recognises the important contribution of the defence industry to the UK; calls on the Government to support the UK defence industry by taking into account the economic and employment benefits to the UK when awarding contracts and to publish a full, overarching defence industrial...

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1032
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his excellent intervention.

I hope that the delay will allow Ministers to reflect on the overwhelming case for an active defence industrial strategy that recognises the immense value of building in Britain and takes a longer term view of the orders that the Government...

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 cc1032-3
House
House of Commons

I do not know whether my hon. Friend has noticed, but Rolls-Royce is in the market to sell off its industrial marine division—the power generation division. Nobody knows yet who is likely to buy it, but it is likely that once again our defence is going to be manufactured abroad...

Member
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1033
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very good point about the need for certainty and long-term planning, so we can give business the confidence to invest here.

As well as ensuring that our armed forces have the very best equipment, a core objective of our defence industrial strategy should be to promote...

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1033
House
House of Commons

Is it not the case that if the fleet solid support ships were built in the UK, 20% of that cost could be recovered by the workers working on those ships paying tax and national insurance?

Member
Chris Stephens (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1033
House
House of Commons

Indeed—at least that amount.

Reports by Oxford Economics highlight that the UK defence industry has an output multiplier of 2.3, meaning that £100 million in UK industry generates some £230 million to the UK economy. Its reports also highlight that each additional job created in the manufacturing element of the defence...

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1033
House
House of Commons

I am listening very attentively to what the hon. Lady is saying. I am sure she will be aware that in March this year HM Treasury published, after a seven year review, a new definition of managing public money, which specifically allows, under UK procurement rules, for the concept of...

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1034
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention and I congratulate him on his excellent report, which he presented on Monday. I note that in it he recommends that UK prosperity should be taken into account in all major procurement decisions. I welcome that statement.

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1034
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for Ludlow (Mr Dunne) raises an interesting point, but the issue is not so much about the policy as about the implementation of it. That is what the Treasury and others have got to start doing.

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1034
House
House of Commons

Indeed. When we speak to defence contractors, we find it is a sad fact that they are not being required to put those details into the bids they make. We very much hope to see that change. I hope that this is an urgent step on that way. The approach...

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 cc1034-5
House
House of Commons

I am very sympathetic to the case that the hon. Lady is making, but the consequence of going down the route that she recommends, and which I am inclined to support, is that the black hole in the defence equipment budget will become even greater. If we accept that there...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1035
House
House of Commons

As I just outlined, it is extremely important that we take into account the way that the money can be brought back into the Treasury, and I very much hope that the right hon. Gentleman’s message will be well understood by Government Front Benchers.

I will make a bit of progress....

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 cc1035-6
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that the Government have a poor track record in doing what she suggests? Under the P-8 and Apache contracts with Boeing, for example, there is very little work share and very few jobs coming back into the UK.

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1036
House
House of Commons

Yes, indeed; as my hon. Friend says, the Government have a poor track record. It is a great shame that so many opportunities have been wasted.

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2018
Reference
644 c1036
House
House of Commons