Skip to main content

1-20 of 43 results for member:"Lord Coaker"

Subject X
Cost effectiveness

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what progress has been made to date in unlocking £6 billion of structural simplification and internal process improvements to be delivered in this current parliament, as recommended by the Strategic Defence Review.

Asked by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
HL1899
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what financial cuts or efficiencies the Ministry of Defence has been asked to make in the financial years 2026-27 and 2027-28.

Asked by
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2026
Reference
HL16409
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment, if any, there has been of the relative cost benefit of (1) decommissioning RFA Argus and (2) carrying out repairs; and what plans have been developed to effect its potential replacement.

Asked by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2025
Reference
HL9981
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what is their estimate of how much money they will save by reducing inefficiencies following the appointment of a new National Armaments Director.

Asked by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 December 2024
Reference
HL2744
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on defence programmes developments.

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 cc503-514
House
House of Lords

I want to start by thanking the noble Baronesses, Lady Goldie and Lady Smith, for their comments and by reiterating that defence is an issue that unites us across this Chamber: we all want the best for our country and for our Armed Forces,

and here there is no division...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 cc508-511
House
House of Lords

That is a really good question. On the first point about spending, the noble and gallant Lord will know that, notwithstanding the amount in the budget—there is 2.3% at the moment, and we have laid out and talked about the pathway to 2.5%—whatever amount of money the defence chiefs have...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 c511
House
House of Lords

We certainly will be purchasing a number of fast jets—the exact number will obviously be subject to debate, but we expect a number of F35Bs to be purchased. On the training of pilots, which the noble Baroness raised, the training and retention of pilots is something for which we have...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 c512
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for raising the point about the industrial dispute affecting the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. The only thing I can say is that discussions are ongoing. We obviously hope it can be resolved to everyone’s satisfaction in due course.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 c512
House
House of Lords

We are certainly a brave Government, but it has been a consistent policy of whatever Government have been in power to support the nuclear deterrent. The nuclear deterrent will continue; we will renew the nuclear deterrent. I just say to the noble Baroness, who is quite entitled to the opinion...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 c512
House
House of Lords

First, we recognised the sensitivities around the deletion of Watchkeeper and they were a consideration. In terms of operations, the decisions around decommissioning were made in a way that would not compromise operations. The chiefs were clear to us that operations would not be compromised by any of the decommissioning...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 c513
House
House of Lords

That is certainly one of the questions the defence review is looking at: how we protect underwater cables, pipelines, et cetera. We are considering the capability that we have to deal with that. I hope I can reassure the noble Lord. I was in Copenhagen last week, where we discussed...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2024
Reference
841 c514
House
House of Lords

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence (John Healey) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I have today made an Oral Statement setting out how our new Government is addressing the challenges facing UK Defence. This Written Ministerial Statement provides fuller detail about the decisions I have...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
20 November 2024
Reference
HLWS235
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the National Audit Office’s value for money analysis of the Ministry of Defence’s Equipment Plan 2023 to 2033, published on 4 December.

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2023
Reference
834 cc1568-1571
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the NAO report is deeply disturbing at a time when we have war in Europe, conflict in the Middle East and growing threats globally. As we have just heard from the Minister, the MoD just dismisses it as a dated snapshot that does not reflect reality. The NAO says that the plan is unaffordable and that forecast costs exceed the available budget by £16.9 billion. It says that the MoD estimates that the funding gap could range between £7.6 billion and £29.8 billion. How is that just a dated snapshot?

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2023
Reference
834 c1569
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish the noble Lord, Lord True, well. I hope that he feels better than he did. I will speak to Amendment 68 in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Hayman, and Amendment 80 in our names and that of the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett....

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2022
Reference
823 cc489-491GC
House
House of Lords

Excuse me for interrupting the Minister but I do not understand what he just said. Amendment 80 would make mandatory what the Government have already said procurement is required to do. Procurement Policy Note 06/21, which the Government have published on their website, is titled:

“Taking account of Carbon Reduction Plans...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2022
Reference
823 cc498-9GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to pursue this. Procurement Policy Note 06/21 helpfully has some frequently asked questions at the end. One asks when it should be applied. It says that the note

“applies to all Central Government Departments”.

What does that mean? Does it apply or not? Is the Minister saying that it...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2022
Reference
823 c499GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that. It is helpful. If I get a letter back saying that the amendment goes further than 06/21, with that information, I can

change the amendment before Report or be satisfied and not need to. It would be very helpful of the Minister to clarify...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2022
Reference
823 c499GC
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage fourth day. Clauses 11 to 14 agreed to. Clause 15 under consideration.

Lead member
Lord True; Baroness Scott of Bybrook
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
13 July 2022
Reference
823 cc453-520GC
House
House of Lords