Skip to main content

1-20 of 811 results for subject:Vetting

Subject X
Costs

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Costs (811)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank the Chief Secretary for his statement. I am interested in the costs. We know about the £75,000 payout, and obviously a police inquiry is incredibly costly. There are the costs to his Department in complying with the Humble Address. Will he publish the costs? Will he also publish...

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c592
House
House of Commons

My best answer is to refer my hon. Friend to the contracts finder tool, which publishes all public procurement contracts and their value. In relation to questions of the internal cost of processing the Humble Address, I cannot commit to give a round number; essentially it involves lots of hours...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c592
House
House of Commons

Moved by

Lord Walney

Member
Lord Walney (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c451
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was disappointed that the Government directed their Members in the Commons to vote down Amendment 311, which would have created a limited power for the Government to designate as an extreme criminal protest group organisations that attempt to influence public policy through a limited number of offences,...

Member
Lord Walney (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc451-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Motion S1 is in my name. On Report, your Lordships supported Amendment 342 for one overriding reason: to make sure that the tragic failures of the past are not built into future law.

Three days ago, the Fulford report into the Southport tragedy was published. I had hoped that...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc453-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will say a few words in relation to Motion N1, in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Walney, on extreme criminal protest groups. The House should be thanking the noble Lord for his enormous efforts and dedication in relation to this important subject over many years.

There...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc454-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I sincerely apologise to the Minister for not being here for the beginning of his speech. He will be glad to know my athleticism, as I was running down the corridor, allowed for me to be in time for his reference to Motion T, which I will speak...

Member
Baroness Foster of Aghadrumsee (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc455-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I supported the noble Baroness, Lady Foster, throughout, and I continue to do so. I also thank the Minister for the time he has taken to engage on the issue and for recognising that this is a serious and pertinent problem. The glorification of terrorism has real consequences,...

Member
Lord Polak (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c457
House
House of Lords

I follow the noble Baroness by apologising to your Lordships that I was not here for the commencement of the Minister’s speech, but I heard the great majority of what he said, and I was also present for the speeches of the noble Lords, Lord Walney and Lord Pannick.

I want...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c458
House
House of Lords

My Lords, just before we progress, while the noble Lord on the Woolsack is absolutely right in what he has just argued, I have just witnessed three Members of this House not complying with the Companion. While my noble friend was wrong to do what he did, it is not...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c458
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I feel as though I have entered into a slightly surreal moment there, but I thank noble Lords for that clarification. I speak very briefly in support of what the noble Lord, Lord Walney, is trying to do—having opposed it at an earlier stage, which is why I...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc458-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely accept the point made by the noble Lord on the Woolsack about the inadequacy of an apology for late arrival in the Chamber, and I am bound to say it is not something I have ever had to make before, but I was late into the...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c459
House
House of Lords

We are a self-governing House. If it is the will of the House that the noble Lord, Lord Marks, speak briefly from the Front Bench, I suggest that we should hear him.

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c460
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope I will be permitted to speak briefly. I have followed the arguments on all these matters throughout these proceedings.

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c460
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my understanding of the Companion is that the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, is correct in what he said: if it wishes, the House can set aside the Companion and hear from a noble Lord, but in that case a Motion has to be put and voted upon.

Member
Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c460
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not know whether this is helpful in any way—probably not—but as the proposer of the Motion, I really would appreciate hearing what the noble Lord on the Front Bench has to say on it.

Member
Lord Walney (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c460
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on that basis, unless I am stopped, I will speak briefly.

On the first Motion I was going to address, that of the noble Lord, Lord Walney, we have a great deal of sympathy for his proposal. Indeed, we would go so far as to say that it seems...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc460-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey, for returning with her amendment. I understand the Government are offering to include alternative interventions in youth diversion order guidance, but I agree with the noble Baroness that these considerations should be consistently applied to ensure proportionality. We therefore support the...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc462-3
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the discussion we have had to date on these matters. As I made clear in my opening remarks—for those who heard them, at least—the Government cannot accept Amendment 311 as drafted. I fully appreciate the work of the noble Lord, Lord Walney, on these issues, but...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 cc463-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone for their insight on and support for the principle behind this matter, which is that urgent action is needed. In the light of what has been said, I am reluctantly content to withdraw my Motion. In doing so, I will leave the Minister with two...

Member
Lord Walney (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
855 c464
House
House of Lords