Skip to main content

1-20 of 162 results for subject:Leave

Subject X
Devolved matters

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Devolved matters (162)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
Date
2 December 2015
Reference
HL 64 2015-16
House
House of Lords

indicated assent.

Member
Julie Morgan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c901
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment No. 1, in page 20, line 9, at end insert— 1A In section 106 of ERA 1996 (replacements) in subsection (2)(a) after "adoption leave" insert "or leave under section 80AA or 80BB (additional paternity leave)".'. This amendment will support employers in managing the new entitlement...

Member
Meg Munn (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c888-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady referred to the figure of £400,000 as the cost for small businesses and made the point that it may well be much higher. Is not the issue also the rather unquantifiable time that it takes someone who is trying to cope with everything to deal with this...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c854
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for North Norfolk (Norman Lamb) used the figure of £38 million when he explained the application of new clause 1 to 50 people.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c864
House
House of Commons

The Minister says that he will wait, and that is fair enough, but I believe that even he does not know the cost to small businesses—monetary and otherwise—of administering and paying for the rights created in the Bill. If he does not know that, it is fair to say that...

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c877-8
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c880
House
House of Commons

I understand that the current provision is 20 days, of which eight days are bank holidays and 12 days are holidays provided by employers. The Warwick agreement states that employers will provide 20 statutory days with eight additional bank holidays on top of that, and the Minister provided an assurance...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c893
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege and honour to follow the hon. Member for Tooting (Mr. Khan) because I had the great pleasure of being a councillor with him in Wandsworth. I congratulate him on his excellent speech. Parental leave is a good thing, and that is accepted on both sides of...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c903-4
House
House of Commons

I will, indeed, and I am grateful, I was coming to the point that the Bill, as part of that jigsaw, is different from other pieces of legislation in at least one respect: it has the support of Her Majesty’s official Opposition. I do not mean to be churlish in...

Member
Sadiq Khan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c902-3
House
House of Commons

And from Conservative Members—I am sorry to have left them out. I understand why the provision to allow people to request flexible working is being phased in. The Government’s step-by-step approach is sensible, but I hope that they will be prepared to consider extending the right to everyone. This is...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c901
House
House of Commons

And from Conservative Members!

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c901
House
House of Commons

It is a real pleasure to speak on Third Reading to a united Chamber. There was, in fact, a broadly united Standing Committee, too. Some on the Opposition Benches would, given the new leadership of the Conservative party, like to forget the recent past, and particularly their voting record. The...

Member
Sadiq Khan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c901-2
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c901
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to hear the supportive comments from Labour Members—

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c901
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c901
House
House of Commons

I see that the Minister is nodding at that. My purpose is merely to ensure that the Government consult fully with business interests on this matter. I am sure that they will, as the effect will be felt most particularly in low-paid employment such as the hospitality and cleaning industries....

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c900-1
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c900
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. I led the campaign for compensation for women who were discharged from the armed forces when they got pregnant. Some 5,000 women were discharged simply because they became pregnant, and we should note the craziness of the resulting lost investment in their training. One of the biggest critics of...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c899-900
House
House of Commons

A very honourable profession.

Member
Rob Marris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2006
Reference
441 c899
House
House of Commons