Skip to main content

1-20 of 175 results for subject:Subscriptions

Subject X
Disclosure of information

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Disclosure of information (175)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Government response to the Consultation on the Implementation of the new Subscription Contracts Regime. 84p.

Deposited by
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Consultation papers (Government responses); Deposited papers
Date
13 April 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0320
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to express my deep concern about the inclusion of the clause repealing Section 116B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and to urge that it be removed in its entirety from the Bill.

The clause does not merely tidy up legislation or...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2025
Reference
846 cc1305-7
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Justin Madders
Answering member
Greg Smith
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
10 February 2025
House
House of Commons

My Lords, we now move on to subscription contracts. I would very much like to understand the reason for Clause 252(2)(c). The Government seem to contemplate that, if a consumer enters into a contract providing for the recurring supply of goods, is liable to pay for each supply and has...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2024
Reference
835 c450GC
House
House of Lords

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill was considered by a Public Bill Committee over fourteen sittings between 13 June and 11 July 2023. This briefing outlines changes made to the Bill's consumer provisions (Parts 3 and 4).

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
15 November 2023
Reference
CBP-9845

Clauses 283, 284, 286 and 287 agreed to as amended. Clause 285 agreed to. Schedule 22 agreed to as amended. Clause 288 agreed to. Clauses 289, 291, 294 to 296 agreed to as amended. Clause 290, 292, 293, 297, 300 to 317 agreed to. Schedule 24 agreed to as amended....

Lead member
Kevin Hollinrake
Answering member
Seema Malhotra
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill Committee
Notes
Information corrected on 20 July at 736 c13-4MC
Date
11 July 2023
House
House of Commons

Examination of witnesses. Committee adjourned.

Lead member
Kevin Hollinrake; Paul Scully
Answering member
Seema Malhotra
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology; Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill Committee
Date
15 June 2023
House
House of Commons

This briefing considers the consumer provisions of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill [Bill 294, 2022-23]. Second reading of the Bill in the House of Commons is scheduled for 17 May 2023.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
CBP-9796
Lead department / agency
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Impact assessments
Date
25 April 2023
Reference
BEIS056(F)-22-CCP
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Lords, we had quite a lengthy discussion about this on the last day in Committee. I do not want to go through all the arguments again—sorely tempted as I am—but I do want to focus on the particular aspects of the amendments in this group, which relates to spending...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2016
Reference
769 cc147-9
House
House of Lords

This briefing provides information in support of the House of Lords consideration of the Trade Union Bill.

Type
Lords Library Briefings - Bills
Date
20 November 2015
Reference
LLN-2015-0044

My Lords, while I can agree with some of the sentiments expressed in the suggested new clause, I do not think that in practice it adds anything to the Bill. I listened carefully to my noble friend Lord Whitty. I can understand the use of a bit of hyperbole to...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1284-5
House
House of Lords

I gather I am allowed to stand by way of explanation. My point is that as a House—and I certainly speak for myself—we have been subjected to an extraordinary degree of lobbying. The problem is that we have had no opportunity to look at that lobbying in a sensible and...

Member
Lord Puttnam (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1285
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I confess that I am one of these people who on occasion does not understand whether something that I want to do on the computer is legal or not. For example, I get e-mails from a company called 3B Software which offers for a small annual sum of...

Member
Lord Maxton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1282-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very quickly, I, too, support this. The noble Lord, Lord Puttnam, made a very valid point. Things of this complexity should not just be suddenly presented here in Committee. Sometimes, even though we may not really disagree, we will appear to be confrontational because of positions we take...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1283-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may add to what the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, has just said, because I basically agree with just about everything he said. I have been enormously influenced during the Bill’s passage by the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, and by several things that the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Puttnam (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1281
House
House of Lords

My Lords, having had the privilege of sitting on these pre-legislative committees to which the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam, referred, I agree absolutely with him. I also agree with the substance of the amendment, as noble Lords would expect, as I have added my name to it. The noble Lord,...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1281-2
House
House of Lords

17: Before Clause 4, insert the following new Clause— "Objective of sections 4 to 16 The objective of the measures in sections 4 to 16 is to move to a lawful means of access to copyright material for consumers and businesses and to reduce unlawful file-sharing and other forms of...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1279
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had intended to make quite a substantive intervention on this matter, but in view of the time and the distinction of the audience—though not the volume of the audience—I shall try to keep it reasonably short. However, it goes to the heart of the Bill and my...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1279-81
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very appreciative of those who spoke in support of this amendment or something like it. The Government have to take on board the range of views which were expressed here. My noble friend Lord Puttnam is very wise to say that this should have been subject...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
717 c1286
House
House of Lords