Skip to main content

1-20 of 852 results for subject:"Learning disability"

Subject X
Educational institutions

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Educational institutions (852)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Education Bill. Lords committee stage second day. Clause 2: Power of members of staff at schools to search pupils, agreed to. Clause 3: Power of members of staff at further education institutions to search students, agreed to. Clause 4: Exclusion of pupils from schools in England: review, under consideration. Grand...

Lead member
Baroness Walmsley
Answering member
Lord Hill of Oareford
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c245-304GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to argue against the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Sutherland. One of the benefits of having someone else to act as a witness to a search is that there is a cooling-off period in a crisis when things could calm down; immediate intervention might well...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c260GC
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister make it clear in the guidance that, if the assessments are done at an early stage as he envisages, they will be made available and the governing body considering a permanent exclusion—and then the review panel at the point of review—will be required to see the assessments...

Member
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c299GC
House
House of Lords

13: Clause 2, page 3, line 43, after ““rules”” insert ““reasonably””

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c245GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a child is disadvantaged in the system not only because he might have SEN or a disability; he is disadvantaged because of the colour of his skin—something he cannot change. I have heard and seen nothing that would make that case better. I have spent many years going...

Member
Baroness Howells of St Davids (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c296GC
House
House of Lords

I agree in principle. The wording in the amendment, ““to retain an excluded pupil on the roll””, means that the child is still recognised as having a connection with the school and that their education elsewhere needs to be funded and their outcomes included. That is one of the problems...

Member
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c296GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, exclusion should be the last resort, a statement with which everyone here wholeheartedly agrees. There was agreement on that when we discussed it on Tuesday and it was a message that I received clearly from the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Children, which I was lucky enough to meet...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c297-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for being absent for much of this debate. I have an amendment in this grouping, Amendment 52A, and I would like to speak to it briefly if I may. It states: "““A review panel may, following a review under this section, direct the Office for Standards...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c297GC
House
House of Lords

Is it in order for me to ask a question? I agree with much of what the noble Baroness says, but does she not recognise that sometimes sending a pupil back to the same school might not be appropriate and might be very difficult both for the school and for...

Member
Baroness Warnock (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c296GC
House
House of Lords

As noble Lords know, the clause changes the appeals process for pupils if they are permanently excluded. It removes the ability to appeal to an independent panel with the power to reinstate a pupil. It does not make any provision for, and does not seem to recognise, the fact that...

Member
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c294-6GC
House
House of Lords

In that case, we would expect the panel to ask for such an assessment if it has been made. We then turn to the amendments that require an automatic trigger to initiate an assessment when a child has been given a certain number of fixed-period exclusions. Whereas I hope that...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c299-302GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support what the noble Baroness, Lady Howells, has said. I feel very sad that three people of culturally diverse backgrounds have had to bring up this point. I should like the Minister to respond to her and for others to be part of this conversation.

Member
Baroness Benjamin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c302GC
House
House of Lords

I make a small intervention on behalf of the noble Baroness, Lady Howells. The Minister has not responded to the point that she made on the issue of race and ethnicity. If the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, was here now he might be able to confirm the issue to which...

Member
Lord Ouseley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c302GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 35 and Amendments 48 to 52 in my name and that of the noble Lord, Lord Low. Children who have been permanently excluded are less likely to achieve five good GCSE results or to be in employment in later life. There is a long-established link...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c286-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Storey, has just told noble Lords about Amendment 43 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, to which I added my name. Apart from saying that it is one that I support very firmly, I think that one can give only full-hearted...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c291-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Quirk, that any exclusion is a tragedy for that pupil and for the school itself. That is not to say that there are not occasions when pupils have to be excluded. Children have a right to learn and teachers have a...

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c291GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely endorse what my noble friend Lord Quirk just said about those with communication difficulties. Like a number of other failings in health and education, I have been alerted to a particular problem by the numbers suffering from it in custody, such as those with the communication...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c288-91GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendments 34 and 35. I do so having in mind particularly children who are speech defective and suffer from various communication needs where the continual and continuous support by speech therapists and others is vital. There is only a small window of opportunity, to coin a...

Member
Lord Quirk (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c288GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to address some of the issues raised by the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, in Amendment 39A. His comments, which I strongly support, take us back to 1979 and the Warnock report. They take us back to why that report and the 1981 Act moved away...

Member
Lord Willis of Knaresborough (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c293GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that the Committee will forgive me for intervening briefly but the last point is very important. What has triggered the behavioural deterioration that has resulted in exclusion? These children may already have special educational needs. The behaviour may be down to bullying but sometimes it is...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2011
Reference
728 c292-3GC
House
House of Lords