Skip to main content

1-20 of 904 results for subject:Prisons

Subject X
Equality

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Equality (904)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they conducted an Equality Impact Assessment of the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014 for (1) prisons, (2) HM Prison and Probation Service, and (3) providers of probation services.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1801
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have conducted an Equality Impact Assessment of the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014; what assessment was made of the impact of the framework on women; and what conclusions were reached.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1802
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they made, during the development of the prison service instruction and probation service instruction Security Vetting: PSI 07/2014, PI 03/2014, of the potential impact on individuals already employed by (1) prisons, (2) HM Prison and Probation Service, and (3) providers of probation services.

Asked by
Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
HL1803
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what features of current prison (a) expansion and (b) construction projects are intended to (i) improve and (ii) address diversity, equality and inclusion.

Asked by
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
15040
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will publish a list of events held by HM Prison and Probation Service in prisons to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in the last year; and what the cost was of each of those events.

Asked by
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
4471
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what is their current budget allocation for work on promoting racial equality in prisons.

Asked by
Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
HL364
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the Supreme Court judgment in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v. The Scottish Ministers.

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Malvern
Department
Women and Equalities
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 cc762-774
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we on these Benches warmly welcome the Supreme Court’s ruling and congratulate For Women Scotland and the many others who have campaigned tirelessly on this issue despite suffering abuse and threats at the hands of activists. I know that noble Lords across the House will agree that there...

Member
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 cc763-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Statement, which we have not had the privilege of listening to in this House today, said that the ruling was not a zero-sum game. That is a phrase I have been using for quite a long time in this context, and I totally agree, but the practical...

Member
Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c766
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this ruling brings welcome clarity and confidence for women and service providers. Throughout my life, not just as a Minister, I have campaigned and worked for women’s rights and for the need for single-sex spaces, including, given my great age, when it was not the mainstream concern that...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 cc766-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her statement of acceptance of the Supreme Court’s judgment and thank the Supreme Court for its courage. This issue has always been about the safety of women and girls in their single-sex spaces for which women, including the Minister, have fought long and...

Member
Baroness Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c768
House
House of Lords

The violence and abuse received by those women who took forward this action and by others who have taken this position is wholly unacceptable, as is the vandalism of statues that we saw over the weekend. We have already condemned that in the strongest possible terms, and we support action...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c768
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again I declare my interest as the parent of a trans child. As a matter of law, the Supreme Court’s decision does not require the exclusion of trans people from all single-sex spaces; rather, it declares that, provided an organisation makes a proportionate decision, then that will...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c769
House
House of Lords

It is clear in the Supreme Court’s judgment that, for the purposes of the Equality Act, where single-sex spaces are being provided, they will be provided on the basis of biological sex. That does not, of course, prevent the provision of inclusive services where there is clarity that those services...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c769
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad that all the main party leaders have accepted the Supreme Court judgment, including my own leader on behalf of the Liberal Democrats. I think it would be better if all leaders could express a welcome for the judgment itself, not just for the clarity it...

Member
Baroness Ludford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c769
House
House of Lords

On the noble Baroness’s final point, as I outlined at the beginning, protecting the most vulnerable people and protecting people on the basis of their protected characteristics remain an important element of the Equality Act and an important element of this Government’s programme and ambitions.

On how the clarity that this...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c769
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we watch Governments around the world roll back on their commitment to the rights of people who choose to live

life differently, and to do so freely, safely and with dignity, I very much welcome the comments the Minister has repeated about the rights of everyone in...

Member
Baroness Bull (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 cc769-770
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness is right that there are technicalities and complications about the way healthcare is provided. There is, however, now clarity through this ruling about where the intention is that spaces should be single sex—as is the case with provisions in wards in hospitals. That should be clear.

The NHS...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c770
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in December Dr Eleanor Frances reached a significant settlement of over £116,000 with a no-confidentiality clause after constructive dismissal from the Civil Service based on her gender-critical beliefs. As a result, the Civil Service committed to revise its guidelines. In the light of the Supreme Court ruling, can...

Member
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c770
House
House of Lords

Gender-critical beliefs are of course protected under the provisions of the Equality Act. I do not know where that particular guidance or those changes have got to, but I will come back to the noble Baroness with progress on that.

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
845 c770
House
House of Lords