Skip to main content

1-20 of 806 results for subject:Intimidation

Subject X
Evidence

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Evidence (806)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Clauses 8 to 20 discussed with Schedule 3 and amendments and new clauses. Clause 8 agreed to. Clause 9, amendment 68 withdrawn. Clauses 9 to 12 agreed to. Clause 13, amendment 70 withdrawn. Clauses 13 to 16 agreed to. Clause 17, amendment 14 negatived on division (3 to 9). Clauses...

Lead member
Sarah Sackman
Answering member
Kieran Mullan
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee
Date
23 April 2026
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
22 September 2025
House
House of Commons

Examination of witnesses.

Lead member
Victoria Atkins; Chris Philp
Answering member
Alex Cunningham; Sarah Jones
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Committee
Date
20 May 2021
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
CHAP 25 2009

The noble Lord cannot get away with that. He knows that it is more or less a nuclear option to vote down an order in this House. The convention is that we very rarely do. As the noble and learned Baroness said, the casinos order was exceptional. It is exceedingly...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is quite right—I was able to illustrate only one case from the recent past, and three from the records. However, that is in the minds of the Government when they create affirmative orders, especially controversial ones. That is why we go through a process of considerable consultation...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

We will come back to this on Report. The Minister should appreciate that the identity of an informer has been kept secret for centuries, and still is. This provision has been introduced to deal with a very narrow area: murder or manslaughter caused with a firearm or knife by someone...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

Amendment 183AA 183AA: After Clause 64, insert the following new Clause— "Review of investigation anonymity orders The Secretary of State must, no later than two years after the commencement of this Part, review the operation of investigation anonymity orders made under section 64, and lay a report of that review...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

In moving this amendment, I wish to speak also to Amendments 183B and 183C in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and Amendment 184 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Dubs. The new clause that I propose should be inserted after Clause 64 is...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c965
House
House of Lords

I wish to speak to Amendments 183B and 183C. I do not pursue Amendment 183B but Amendment 183C would add something to the Bill. In order that the Committee can understand what it is about, let me explain that the application for an investigation anonymity order will be made to...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c965-6
House
House of Lords

My name is attached to the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, and he has set out the reasons for it. I add only this. Of course the Director of Public Prosecutions is able to delegate his responsibility, and in each large police station these days a CPS representative...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c967
House
House of Lords

I turn first to Amendment 183AA in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Henley, and say in passing how much we appreciate the suddenness with which he has had to take on this major responsibility. I thank him very much for doing so straight away. All of us around...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c967-9
House
House of Lords

Amendment 183A 183A: Clause 62, page 37, line 30, leave out subsection (4)

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c959
House
House of Lords

I shall speak also to Amendment 185ZG, which relates to the removal of Clause 86(7). When he was responding to the previous amendment, the Minister told us that the provision for anonymity in investigations is narrowly drawn. The provision set out in the Bill may be narrowly drawn, but under...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c959-60
House
House of Lords

The only reason I mentioned Amendment 185A is that I thought it was a bare minimum to at least make it affirmative. I agree with the noble and learned Baroness that both affirmative and negative instruments can slip through. I just mentioned it as I thought it was some indication...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c961
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has given his view that clearly the idea of affirmative statutory instrument means that the Government are having some sort of second thoughts. I suggest that they might have third thoughts and wonder whether this is an appropriate subsection.

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c961
House
House of Lords

I added my name to the first of the noble Lord’s amendments, to leave out subsection (4), giving power to the Secretary of State to add or omit an offence. As the noble Lord implied, we suspect that Secretary of State will not be omitting any offences—he will merely be...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c960
House
House of Lords

The proposal concerns me. The Minister was speaking against Amendment 183ZA, which would have extended the use of this clause beyond murder and manslaughter. However, under subsection (4), the Secretary of State could enlarge it to anything at all, although the Government seem at the moment opposed to enlarging it...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c960-1
House
House of Lords

I will make two points. First, I vividly recall the super-casino debate on the affirmative resolution. It was a quite exceptional situation. My recollection is that the House did not like super-casinos and voted, quite unusually, against the resolution. Secondly, on the subject of Clause 62(4), I am not opposed...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c963
House
House of Lords

I will comment on the process of making an order. While the noble Lord is quite right that there is no opportunity to amend an order within the House of Lords, the process of consultation that leads to an order is one in which the Government take account of inputs...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c962-3
House
House of Lords