Skip to main content

1-20 of 532 results for legtitle:"Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2010-12"

Subject X
Family law

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Family law (532)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Ministry of Justice
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 January 2012
Reference
DEP2012-0144
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Ministry of Justice
Type
Deposited papers
Date
23 January 2012
Reference
DEP2012-0145
House
House of Lords

6: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause— ““Pre-commencement impact assessment (1) The Lord Chancellor must commission an independent review to assess and report on the following areas— (a) the expected costs and impacts of Part 1 on— (i) children and young people; (ii) people with disabilities, including people...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c21-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I note that the noble Lord spoke not only to Amendment 8 but to Amendments 9, 10, 11, 12 and 104. I hope that that was intentional. I am happy to reply to both groups. According to my batting order they were supposed to be spoken to separately....

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c76
House
House of Lords

Inadvertence.

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c76
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorely tempted to test the opinion of the House on Clause 4 tonight; I think it would be the better course to take. I am going to resist that sore temptation, but only just, because—here I am supporting what the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, said in...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c97
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is repeating the thrust of a number of contributions that I have heard today. My response indicates the Government’s position at the moment. Again, along with this response will be the comments that he and other noble Lords have made. Let us see where we go from...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c93-5
House
House of Lords

It was free.

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c104
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand that the Government are increasing funding for mediation by two-thirds, which is something that the Lord Chancellor has made considerable play of. But are the Government not at risk of putting rather too many eggs into this basket, particularly with the removal of legal aid, which...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c108
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 7 seeks to require a novel situation whereby specific arrangements that the Lord Chancellor may make under Clause 2(2)(c) would have to be included in an order subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. I believe that it will be beneficial to expand on the purpose of the...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c73-4
House
House of Lords

I must rise to that jibe; I am an experienced Lord.

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c46
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Bach, for the way he has summed up the debate. This clause reflects the Government’s absolute determination to make it clear that the director will be independent. I have to say that when I look at this cluster of amendments...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c90-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as another non-lawyer, perhaps I may join in very briefly. I have listened to everything that has been said on this point, and what the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, said is particularly important. The Lord Chancellor has a different role. He might not have all the legal discipline...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c88-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support the amendments, particularly Amendment 15 in my name. I concur with all the comments that have been made so far because I am particularly concerned about the independence of the director of legal aid casework. Institutional pressure can work in very subtle ways. The director...

Member
Baroness Prashar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c88
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have heard short but very impressive speeches on this very important group. Clause 4 is particularly important and it is absolutely vital that the Government get this right. We want to help them get it right all across the House. I hope that the Minister will have...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c89-90
House
House of Lords

The issue that concerns me in Clause 4 is subsection (3). Under subsection (4): "““The Lord Chancellor may not give directions or guidance about the carrying out of … functions in relation to individual cases””." That is fair enough, but he must, "““comply with directions given by the Lord Chancellor...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c89
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support the amendments. I will be brief, as the reasons were so admirably summarised by the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, and by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Woolf. The post of director will be critical for the preservation of whatever is left of legal aid....

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c86
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak to Amendments 14 and 16, where my name is coupled with those of my noble friends Lord Thomas of Gresford, Lord Carlile of Berriew and Lord Macdonald of River Glaven—I am sure that the Committee will recognise that we are four hardened lawyers. I concur entirely...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c87-8
House
House of Lords

When the Minister replies, will he assist the House by telling us what will be the manifestations of the independence of the director of legal aid casework? For example, will the director produce an annual report to be laid before Parliament or in some other way made accessible to the...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c88
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a very real difficulty about the whole of Clause 4 because there is nothing in it that suggests that there is any degree of independence in the director, other than in subsection (4). I respectfully agree with all noble Lords who have spoken so far about...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c88
House
House of Lords