Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for member:"Bishop of Chester"

Subject X
Fines

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Fines (15)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am pleased to speak in general support of the regulations and guidance. They relate to matters which I and others raised during the passage of the Digital Economy Bill in 2017 and, more broadly, to issues debated by the House a couple of years ago in a...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1286-8
House
House of Lords

From these Benches, I support the Government and the way in which the legislation has been drafted, provided that it is enacted and applied with the flexibility that the Minister is describing. I do not do so in the spirit of being too puritanical, I hope. Living in the middle...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c901-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with everything that has been said so far. I want to pick up on what the noble Baroness, Lady Stern, was saying. The figures for youth suicide in this country are an absolute scandal. The number of young people who commit suicide every year is equivalent...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2008
Reference
700 c1054
House
House of Lords

To use what most people would find offensive as a central criterion is too subjective. We live in a society where we have a diverse range of tastes; there are lots of things I do not like at all but which are legal in this society. It is interesting that...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2008
Reference
699 c909-10
House
House of Lords

I want to offer some general support to the Government for what they are attempting to do with these clauses. To bring pressure to bear in our society on the extraordinary explosion of what we might generally call pornographic images seems to me to be laudable and right. I share...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2008
Reference
699 c899-900
House
House of Lords

I strongly support the amendments, especially the second one. To put any formal limit on the time when application may be made for compensation is flawed in itself, but six years would be better than two. As the noble Lord, Lord Elystan-Morgan, said so eloquently, there is no moral equivalence...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2008
Reference
699 c884
House
House of Lords

To ensure that the record is accurate, the noble Lord is right to say that there was no contact whatever between me and the police, which was interesting at the time. However, partly supporting his point, the police seemed to assume that the newspaper report was accurate without making any...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2008
Reference
699 c925
House
House of Lords

I entirely share the intention of the mover of the amendment, but the question is whether and why one should single out this form of threat and put it in the Bill. Once you start to do that, you lose the whole basis on which the legislation has been framed,...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2008
Reference
699 c921-2
House
House of Lords

I would say only that I believe this demonstration of freedom of speech is exactly what your Lordships expect.

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2008
Reference
699 c938
House
House of Lords

I pretty much agreed with what the noble Lord, Lord Waddington, said when he introduced this debate, although I am not entirely convinced that the amendment would be helpful. I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Stoddart, about the importance of freedom of speech, but in any society free...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2008
Reference
699 c936-7
House
House of Lords

Before the noble and learned Lord sits down, I thank him for his earlier explanation. I accept that if the Crown Prosecution Service is seen as the driver of the system, it protects the police from being seen as junior magistrates, although maintaining that distinction will be very important. However,...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2006
Reference
684 c377
House
House of Lords

When I read Clause 15 I was saddened, for the reasons that have been given in this debate. In a week when the Government have pushed through a clear separation between the legislative and judicial aspects of society, it is odd to see the confusions being introduced when punishment is...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2006
Reference
684 c371-2
House
House of Lords

I object even more strongly to the term ““summary justice”” than I do to ““administrative punishment””.

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2006
Reference
684 c378
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether I could press the Minister on this point by asking for some definition of the word ““know””. Does it mean beyond reasonable doubt, the balance of probabilities or reasonable suspicion? It would be helpful to know a little bit about what the word ““know”” means in this context.

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2005
Reference
676 c629
House
House of Lords

: I want to press on an associated matter, picking up on a point made earlier by the noble Baroness, Lady Williams: that while a defence may be mounted, the whole process of investigation and police inquiry, even short of a court case, will have quite a marked effect upon academic...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2005
Reference
676 c629-30
House
House of Lords