Skip to main content

1-20 of 202 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Freedom of expression

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Freedom of expression (202)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the implications for freedom of speech of (1) transparency orders, and (2) privacy injunctions, used in family courts, which may restrict named individuals from discussing the case with third parties including family and media outlets.

Asked by
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2023
Reference
HL471
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendment. Lords amendment 10E not insisted on and Commons amendment 10F in lieu agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Baroness Thornton
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1869-1879
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Howe

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 c1870
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we return to consider the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill for what I hope will be the final time. I thank noble Lords once again for the insightful debates that we have had on this important Bill, which is designed to ensure that the higher education sector...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1870-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I seek some clarification of the new subsection (3)(b) proposed in Amendment 10F, which provides:

“A person may bring proceedings under subsection (1) only if … a decision has been made under that scheme as to the extent to which the complaint was justified”.

I seek clarification that an institution...

Member
Baroness Lawlor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 c1871
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his introduction of the government amendment in lieu and Amendment 10F.

When the Bill left this House with the amendments, led by the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Willetts, which was supported from these Benches, it was the Government’s own amendment at...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1871-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when this Bill left your Lordships’ House, it seemed that through the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Willetts, we had achieved a reasonable and workable compromise. Sensibly, the Government had accepted as axiomatic the principle that the person complaining that their freedom of speech had been...

Member
Lord Grabiner (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1872-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very glad to be here, to hopefully see the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill fly through at last and become law. I am also pleased to see that some attempt has been made to restore some teeth to this important legislation. It is true that...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1873-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a long process for a Bill that started two years ago. There have been five changes of Secretary of State for Education since then, more changes of junior Minister, and a certain sense that many of us have had that some of the Ministers guiding...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1875-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are now reaching the conclusion of what has been a long, time-consuming, complex process, and I think the process of revising and scrutinising this legislation has meant that we have ended up with a Bill that is better designed and stronger and more effective than when we...

Member
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1876-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords for their questions and comments, which I shall do my best to respond to. I begin with the noble Lord, Lord Wallace, who made, if I may say so, a very gracious speech—I know that he has severe doubts about the Bill....

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1877-9
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage second day. Clauses 9 to 15 agreed to. Clause 16 agreed to as amended. Clauses 17 and 18 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Murray of Blidworth
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1289-1362
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Fox of Buckley

80: Clause 9, page 10, line 28, after first “who” insert “, without reasonable excuse,”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment provides for a defence where the person has a reasonable excuse for being within a buffer zone and has access to that defence prior to charge.

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1289
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to a range of amendments associated with Clause 9: Amendments 80, 81, 82, 83, 86, 89, 92 and 94. I have also put my name to Amendments 88 and 90 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Beith, and have some sympathy with Amendments...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1289-1293
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 80A is in my name. I will also speak to the other amendments in this group. I welcome the Government’s commitment at Second Reading to introduce zones around all clinics in England and Wales to ensure that women are able to access their legal right to abortion...

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1293-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 98 and 99, to which my noble friend Lady Sugg just referred. We need to stand back. Our constitutional responsibility in this House is to scrutinise, amend and, where necessary, push back on legislation that is unwise or uncompliant. We have particular leeway...

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1294-7
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord address the point that regulations are unamendable?

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1297
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Viscount for the intervention. I would have thought that regulations are amendable by a debate in this House.

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1297
House
House of Lords

They are not, and they never have been.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1297
House
House of Lords

These regulations would allow for sunset and review provisions to be included, so the legislation can cease to have effect if appropriate, as I said.

I was talking about how regulations that require consultation with key stakeholders and need approval by both Houses improve on the current public spaces protection order...

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1297-8
House
House of Lords