Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for subject:Taxis

Subject X
Internet

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
16 September 2025
Reference
HC 1224 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent steps she has taken to ensure adequate (a) working conditions and (b) pay for app-based (i) private hire drivers and (ii) couriers.

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 2025
Reference
60595
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of online taxi app companies on (a) independent taxi companies and (b) their drivers.

Asked by
Lee Anderson (Reform UK)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
57347
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will take steps to prevent the unfair dismissal of drivers by app-based private hire companies through the suspension or deactivation of those drivers' accounts by those companies.

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 April 2022
Reference
149342
House
House of Commons

That this House condemns the opaque and unjust process by which app-based couriers and private hire drivers working for companies such as UBER and Deliveroo can be blocked permanently from their accounts and thus effectively dismissed from their jobs; recognises that couriers and private hire drivers are key workers who...

Primary sponsor
Ian Byrne (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
1110
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 30/05/2019 from Baroness Williams of Trafford to Lord Rosser regarding an issue raised during the debate on grooming gangs: a working group on preventing advertising from funding online abuse and work to explore the characteristics of group-based child sexual exploitation. 3p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
30 May 2019
Reference
DEP2019-0603
House
House of Lords

I thank all right hon. and hon. Members across the House who have contributed to this wide-ranging debate. The shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury managed the unusual feat of opening the debate without mentioning a single measure in the Finance Bill, although he did brandish a very thin pamphlet,...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2018
Reference
649 cc134-5
House
House of Commons

(Except clause 8; clause 33 and schedule 9; clauses 40 and 41 and schedule 11; new clauses or new schedules relating to the income tax treatment of armed forces' accommodation allowances, the bank levy, stamp duty land tax, the effect of the Bill on equality, or the effect of the...

Lead member
Mel Stride
Answering member
Peter Dowd; Anneliese Dodds
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee
Date
16 January 2018
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
31 January 2017
Reference
CHAP 4 2017; 2017 c. 4

Motion lapsed. Motion made and question proposed that this House do now adjourn. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Tulip Siddiq
Answering member
Penny Mordaunt
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 cc550-8
House
House of Commons

I decided to call this debate because I wanted to highlight the cost of living people for disabled people. The truth is that disabled people should be able to learn, work and live independently without facing a financial penalty. Unfortunately, however, that is not the case. Whether because of a...

Member
Tulip Siddiq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 c550
House
House of Commons

Owing to the lack of time in the debate, I will focus mainly on the causes of the extra costs rather than the well-trodden path of existing support payments, although I acknowledge from the outset that the battle to manage the extra costs is made all the more difficult by...

Member
Tulip Siddiq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 cc550-1
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that, severely disabled people who relied on the independent living fund to function—to eat independently, take part in society and so on—face additional problems, because the funding for the ILF has not been replaced? My constituent Mary Ellen Archer is an active member of the...

Member
Ruth Cadbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 c551
House
House of Commons

I wholeheartedly agree with my hon. Friend. Like her constituent Mary, others want to live independently and not be humiliated in their everyday living, and it is being made more difficult for them. The other point I should add in respect of my hon. Friend’s point is that people who...

Member
Tulip Siddiq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 cc551-2
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a powerful speech and putting the issue firmly on the agenda in the House. On her points about accessibility to taxis and private hire vehicles, does she agree that that is because of some of the problems that people with disabilities can experience with public...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 c552
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her intervention. I have seen real-life instances of what she describes in my constituency. I agree that we need to do more to ensure that Transport for London makes both buses and tube stations more accessible. Indeed, only 4% of

the tube stations in...

Member
Tulip Siddiq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 c552
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way and for raising this important issue. I hope we can shortly achieve a breakthrough in the long-running campaign for step-free access at Newbury Park station. As chair of the all-party group on taxis, may I say to her that the...

Member
Wes Streeting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 c553
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention. I absolutely agree with him and recognise all the hard work he has done to secure the voices of black cab drivers in his area. Not long ago I was in a black cab with him and the driver instantly recognised him...

Member
Tulip Siddiq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 cc553-4
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to respond to the debate. This is my first Adjournment debate in my new ministerial role, and I am now in my 13th week. One opportunity a new Minister has in getting acquainted with their new Department is to ask dumb questions. Many of the dumb questions...

Member
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 cc554-7
House
House of Commons

The Minister waxes lyrical about the importance of disabled people being able to participate in society—to work and to socialise if they want to—but does she not recognise the fact that the withdrawal of funds to key services and the withdrawal of benefits make that aspiration virtually impossible?

Member
Ruth Cadbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2016
Reference
615 c557
House
House of Commons