Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,242 results for subject:"Public sector"

Subject X
Investment

Type

-
Early day motions (2)
+ Legislation (1) + Bills (1) + Public bills (1)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (1,827)
-
Maiden speeches (16)
-
Oral answers to questions (34)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (10)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,756)
+ Parliamentary committees (27) + Committee proceedings (17)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
-
Select Committee reports (10)
+ Parliamentary papers (76)
-
Command papers (8)
-
Consultation papers (3)
-
Deposited papers (49)
-
House of Commons papers (14)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Impact assessments (1)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (78) + Debates (44)
-
Adjournment debates (5)
-
Budget debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (17)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
-
Debates on select committee reports (3)
+ Legislative debates (26)
-
Debates on bills (26)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (32) + Oral statements (24)
-
Ministerial statements (24)
-
Written statements (8)
+ Parliamentary questions (294) + Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (10)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Written questions (260)
+ Research briefings (2)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Investment (2,242)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the updated HM Treasury Green Book on the geographic distribution of public investment across the UK.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2026
Reference
14513
House
House of Commons

Lords message considered. Commons insistence on its disagreement to Lords amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88. Insists on Commons amendments 88C, 88E to 88P, 88R, 88S and 88W, does not insist on 88A, 88T, 88U and 88V but proposes amendments (a)...

Lead member
Torsten Bell
Answering member
Helen Whately
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc839-848
House
House of Commons

Let me begin by welcoming the Minister back to his place—we missed him last night, and it is good to see him back in the Chamber.

Throughout our many debates, we have broadly agreed on the policy intent behind most of the Bill, but as I have said time and again,...

Member
Helen Whately (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc840-2
House
House of Commons

The Liberal Democrats have opposed mandation from day one, and we have continued to oppose it throughout the passage of this Bill. The challenge is that once we cross the Rubicon, we change the dynamics of pensions significantly. Crucially, people need to have confidence that contributing to pensions is a...

Member
Steve Darling (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c843
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an incredibly important point about crossing the Rubicon, given that the Government are taking mandation powers to interfere in people’s savings and assets. We are talking about pension funds here, but once that Rubicon is crossed, there is no reason why the Government would not feel...

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c843
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a powerful point; I am sure that the Minister will reflect on it when winding up. The Liberal Democrats continue to oppose mandation, and we plan to vote against the motion tonight.

Member
Steve Darling (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c843
House
House of Commons

I thank hon. Members for their contributions, and the shadow Secretary of State for her kind words.

I will be brief. The Government have continued to insist on the inclusion of the reserve power in the Bill in all rounds of discussions in this place because we have not heard a...

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c843
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88, insists on its amendments 88C, 88E to 88P, 88R, 88S and 88W to the words restored to the Bill by...

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc839-840
House
House of Commons

As the shadow Secretary of State has said, there is a lot to be welcomed in the Bill. In considering the Bill, we have looked to Australia and Canada, and at best practice throughout the world, and there is much we have drawn from. For the Liberal Democrats, the pensions...

Member
Steve Darling (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c650
House
House of Commons

I recognise, as the shadow Secretary of State set out, that there has been a great deal of consensus on many aspects of the Bill, and that we are wrangling merely over this one remaining issue. The Opposition argue that this power is wrong in principle, but we fundamentally disagree....

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c650
House
House of Commons

With the greatest respect, the Minister is talking nonsense. At the end of the day, every trustee has a fiduciary duty to get the best return for their members. By putting in these mandation powers, the Government are fundamentally going against the most basic principle of the City of London,...

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c651
House
House of Commons

I am sorry to disappoint the hon. Gentleman, but that is not going to happen. We have to deal with the collective action problem that we are facing, to ensure that providers can move forward with the commitments that they have made. The power gives them assurance, but we hope...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c651
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is quoting selectively from a letter that I have written to the industry. We had this exact debate with the Pensions Minister last week. There is an acknowledged and debated collective action problem; on that, there is a level of consensus, but there is no consensus that...

Member
Helen Whately (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c651
House
House of Commons

On the consensus in the industry, I say to the hon. Lady that it wants this Bill done and taken through this House. Tonight’s amendments make the savers’ interest test easier to pass, create a lower threshold for an exemption, and give certainty that the exemption will be granted where...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c651
House
House of Commons

Lords message considered. Commons insistence on its disagreement to Lords amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88 and insistence on Commons amendments 88A, 88C and 88E to 88P, with Commons amendments (a) to (f) proposed. Agreed to on division (279 to 164).

Lead member
Andrew Western
Answering member
Mark Garnier; Helen Whately
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc645-651
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88, insists on its amendments 88A, 88C and 88E to 88P to the words restored to the Bill by that disagreement,...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c645
House
House of Commons

According to the Order Paper,

“The Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Parliament and Senedd Cymru have approved Legislative Consent Resolutions”.

Some of my colleagues in the Assembly back home have expressed some of the concerns that the Lords have expressed. I am conscious of where we are going and where we will...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c645
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will be aware that conversations are always ongoing to ensure that any legislation that comes from this place can be adopted by all the nations of this great country. I hope that some of the concerns that have continued to be raised by his colleagues, and by...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc646-7
House
House of Commons

First, may I thank the hon. Gentleman for opening this evening’s debate, and for setting out the latest Government amendments, in place of the Pensions Minister? These ping-pong sessions with the hon. Member for Swansea West (Torsten Bell) have become a regular in my diary, and I will miss him...

Member
Helen Whately (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc647-9
House
House of Commons

Lords message considered. Motion, that this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88, insists on its amendments 88A and 88C to the words restored to the Bill by that disagreement, does not...

Lead member
Torsten Bell
Answering member
Helen Whately
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 April 2026
Reference
784 cc357-370
House
House of Commons