Skip to main content

1-20 of 630 results for legtitle:"Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2010-12"

Subject X
Liability

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Liability (630)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill. Programme motion agreed to on division (300 votes to 243).Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments agreed to. Lords amendments disagreed to. Commons amendments and amendments in lieu made to Lords amendments. Motion that a Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons to...

Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c195-90
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister not accept, though, that some cases will now simply go unrepresented and unpursued, and that victims will instead have to rely on the Government's own compensation scheme, in which the average payment is £16,000? This change will be an expensive choice for the Government, because it will...

Member
Kate Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c267
House
House of Commons

I am actually saying quite the opposite. I am saying that damages are going to be increased, not decreased. The aim of our reforms is to end the current situation whereby legal firms can get away with charging what they want because the claimants do not have a stake in...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c268
House
House of Commons

Let me repeat what I said: this is not a question of whether the person making a claim has a valid claim but of how much his lawyer gets paid. That is what we are looking at, and that is where the system needs reform. To be clear—I say that...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c265
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to follow such a powerful and brave speech from the hon. Member for Chatham and Aylesford (Tracey Crouch). She spoke incredibly well on the subject. I wish to speak briefly in support of Lords amendment 31, and I hope that the Under-Secretary of State for Justice,...

Member
Lord Walney (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c272
House
House of Commons

Yes, I gladly accept that, but that does not address the underlying concern that the terms are unduly restrictive and will not cover all those who require support and assistance.

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c242
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for that intervention and for putting on the record the fact that the Justice Secretary has made that point clear, which is welcome. Finally, with respect to our Liberal Democrat amendment, I am satisfied with the undertakings that the Justice Secretary has given to...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c244-5
House
House of Commons

As I said, this is a question of what lawyers get paid. I am in no way assessing the vulnerability of the individuals whom the hon. Gentleman mentioned. I point out to the hon. Gentleman that significant steps have been taken in recent years to lower the barriers to bringing...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c266-7
House
House of Commons

The Minister may be aware that Barrow is the constituency with the second highest number of mesothelioma suffers in the country. Does he not understand how insulting and potentially distressing it is to those sufferers to be branded as part of a compensation culture?

Member
Lord Walney (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c266
House
House of Commons

Decisions are made about such cases now, and even under the existing system, if there are large sums involved, ATE insurance companies want to know the likelihood of losing. A lawyer also has to make such an assessment. As things stand, the balance is not right, and we want to...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c267
House
House of Commons

Even if damages for future care and losses are protected, the average life expectancy for advanced mesothelioma has been disclosed as being about nine to 12 months—so that is a great comfort. How can the Minister seriously tell the House that there will be no loss of damages given that...

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c267
House
House of Commons

People entering into a conditional fee agreement have a relationship with their lawyer, and it is quite right that someone who employs a lawyer has some idea of what is on that lawyer's clock and what they are charging. That is very important. If someone is sick, they will have...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c268
House
House of Commons

Even if I accepted the Minister's argument about plaintiffs keeping an eye on fees, which I do not, how would someone with no legal training who was dying of mesothelioma be supposed to keep monitoring their lawyers' fees?

Member
Helen Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c268
House
House of Commons

I will be as brief I can, because a number of my hon. Friends also wish to speak to the two amendments on industrial diseases. If appropriate, Madam Deputy Speaker, I shall say a brief word about the Lords amendment on metal theft as this is the only opportunity to...

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c268-70
House
House of Commons

The dangers of asbestos and the risks of asbestosis and mesothelioma have been known since the 1920s. Successive Governments of both persuasions have ignored them. In the London fire brigade, in which I served for 23 years, we used asbestos equipment regularly. Every firefighter who worked with the London fire...

Member
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c270
House
House of Commons

That is exactly what is happening.

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c270
House
House of Commons

Is the Minister aware that the lead asbestos case was very complicated and took six years to get to the Supreme Court? Does he really think that lawyers will take those kinds of cases without an assurance that their costs will be met?

Member
Helen Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c265
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister tell us of one case in which a mesothelioma sufferer has taken something to court that did not deserve to go there—one case in which a sufferer from this horrible disease, which leaves them dying in a horribly painful way, has in any way abused the system?

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c265
House
House of Commons

This is not a question of whether mesothelioma sufferers receive adequate legal support but of how much their lawyers get paid for providing it. We are saying that that must be more reasonably assessed, and that is the point of our reforms. Let me remind hon. Members that the current...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c265
House
House of Commons

A number of my constituents who worked on the docks in Goole and in power stations have been affected by this illness. There seems to be a lot of confusion in this debate. For simplicity's sake, will the Minister say whether my constituents who worked at the docks and who...

Member
Andrew Percy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2012
Reference
543 c266
House
House of Commons