Skip to main content

1-20 of 118 results for subject:Separation

Subject X
Marriage guidance

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Marriage guidance (118)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful to my right hon. and learned Friend for giving way a second time. The acid test is: as a result of this legislation, will there be more divorces or fewer? It is my contention that if we make something easier, people are more likely to do it.

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c99
House
House of Commons

I understand entirely my right hon. Friend’s concerns. The number of divorces has declined in recent years, but that perhaps goes back to the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Winchester about the beginning of it, because the number of marriages has declined in proportion since 1972,...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 cc99-100
House
House of Commons

Of course, it is not necessary to make any allegation under the present law—people do not have to prove fault if they rely on separation. In addition to the present grounds for divorce, why do we not go down the Scottish route of having a no-fault provision, perhaps of a...

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c100
House
House of Commons

As ever, I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for his constructive approach. He quite properly seeks to make a comparison with a nearby jurisdiction—a next-door jurisdiction—but I believe that taking a more comprehensive approach will cure problems for the long term. Rather than encouraging a piecemeal approach to...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c100
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. and learned Friend give way?

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c100
House
House of Commons

I will just make some progress. I will of course allow for interventions in a proportionate way, remembering the time pressures that we are all under.

The Bill purposefully does not seek to change the other aspects of divorce law for financial provision—I dealt with that issue in my response to...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 cc100-1
House
House of Commons

I have found the reason I referred to. I think the unease that many feel about this legislation is the timing of it—the so-called lockdown break-ups. I can understand why that is a sensitive issue at a sensitive time on what the Lord Chancellor rightly says is a sensitive matter....

Member
Steve Brine (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c101
House
House of Commons

First of all, no time is an easy time. This is a sensitive matter at all times. Secondly, these are not quickie divorces. We are regularising the position to end the so-called quickie and to equalise the position with regard to minimum terms. We must, I believe, accept that divorce...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c101
House
House of Commons

I thank my right and learned hon. Friend for giving way. I am listening hard to what he is saying in the hope that he might be able to persuade me to support his Bill. I know that he brings it forward with exactly the right motives. He talks about...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c101
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with my hon. Friend on his last point.

This is not—I repeat not—a quickie divorce bill, and he is right to say that we in this House owe it to all our constituents to send the right message. Let me put it straight—this is a matter that he...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c102
House
House of Commons

As someone who is tragically going through the divorce process and has had to put blame on my partner when I would have preferred to have had a no-fault divorce, I ask my right hon. and learned Friend to reaffirm the message that this is, in no way, a quick...

Member
Jonathan Gullis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c102
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has shared a difficult and sensitive experience with the House, for which we are grateful, and he puts it extremely powerfully. This is not about blame or guilt; it is about acknowledging the fact that the causes of divorce are very complex and will evolve often over...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c102
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. and learned Friend give way?

Member
Alexander Stafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c103
House
House of Commons

I need to make some progress, because I am conscious of time.

The lack of transparency and objectivity means that a spouse who is trying not to cause unnecessary hurt risks not meeting the legal threshold. That has consequences, for example, for victims of domestic abuse and can lead to the...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 cc103-4
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c104
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for his speech introducing this important piece of legislation. Labour welcomes this Bill, which offers a common-sense approach that continues to respect the institution of marriage and civil partnerships, but avoids unnecessary antagonism and costs for people dealing with an often incredibly difficult time...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 cc105-6
House
House of Commons

I am so pleased to see the right hon. Gentleman back on the Opposition Front Bench. He is a dear old friend, but he is quite wrong about this. These provisions declare at the outset that the marriage is irreconcilable. If that happened at the end of the process rather...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c106
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman. Ever since I first came into this House, it is true: we have had a sort of friendship across the aisle. I say that with a degree of humour, to which I know he is disposed himself. He raises an important issue,...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 cc106-8
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

Marriage will always be one of the most vital institutions in our society, but we also have to face the sad reality that marriages sometimes breakdown. No one sets out thinking that their marriage is going to end....

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c95
House
House of Commons

My wife and I have been married for 33 years and my mum and dad and were married for almost 61 years. The sanctity of marriage is very important. Does the Minister not agree that more funding must be allocated to counselling services to provide trained help for those in...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
677 c95
House
House of Commons