Skip to main content

1-20 of 263 results for subject:Dissolution

Subject X
Ministerial powers

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Ministerial powers (263)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I respectfully agree with much of what the noble and learned Lord said about the drafting of this clause and agree that it should not be treated as a precedent in the future for other ouster clauses. The drafting is unprecedented, because the decision of the Supreme Court...

Member
Lord Trevethin and Oaksey (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1611-2
House
House of Lords

I am listening to the noble Lord with care and I think that there is a fundamental flaw in his argument. On that basis, does he not accept that a simple majority is used for every piece of legislation in the House of Commons? Why should calling a general election...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1590
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the third time in your Lordships’ House that we have had a debate focused on this issue. At Second Reading, it was a key issue, as it was in Committee. It comes down to a fundamental point.

In the other place and, indeed, in your Lordships’ House,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1597-9
House
House of Lords

I find the noble Lord’s comments quite offensive. He is suggesting that it is inappropriate for your Lordships’ House, having debated this issue for significantly longer than the other place, to suggest an alternative. That is perfectly reasonable and normal. The arrangements that he says should be in place are...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1602
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will start where I started in the previous debate, with the parliamentary TARDIS: the Government say that we can set things back to where they were before. Ministers in the other House and in your Lordships House said that this Bill brings clarity, but it is clear...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1621
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I remind the Minister that there was a Constitution Committee report on the Cabinet Manual and I think the Government have yet to respond. Could he give an update on when a response is likely to be? As it would cover these issues, it would be helpful when...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1629
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Judge

1: Clause 2, page 1, line 9, at end insert—

“(1A) The powers referred to in subsection (1) shall not be exercised unless the House of Commons passes a motion in the form set out in subsection (1B).

(1B) The form of motion for the purposes of subsection (1A) is...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1584
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the recent Committee debate I undertook to reread Hansard because I particularly wanted to address the views expressed by those who disagreed with this amendment. I have done so. I continue to respect those views but I do not share them. I am going to urge the...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1584-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have signed once more on Report this amendment, along with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, and I entirely agree with what he just said to the House. That is partly in the light of the debate in Committee, which compellingly reinforced the need to send...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1587-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I mentioned in Committee and I mention again to the House now that I have always been a strong critic of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act and I was pleased when the Government decided to do away with it. But I find myself in a strange position now of...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1588-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise that I was not present during the Committee stage. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, knows that I have great respect for him. We enjoyed working together in opposition to the Government’s Internal Market Bill. He was courteous enough to ask me my opinion of...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1589
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord acknowledge, as my noble friend has proved, that, in the circumstances about which he is talking,

the Government had a majority for an election? Therefore, this amendment would not have created the difficulties that he is suggesting.

Member
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1589
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness and her friends cannot possibly give an assurance that a circumstance will not arise not precisely the same as that which occurred between 2017 and 2019 but in which a simple majority could not be obtained for an election, because a majority of the House of Commons...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1590
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord seems to be missing the fundamental fact that the problems to which he referred took place under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, which required a two-thirds majority. This Bill gets rid of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. The circumstances that occurred in 2017-19, as the noble Lord, Lord Lansley,...

Member
Lord Reid of Cardowan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1590
House
House of Lords

With respect to the noble Lord—he knows I have great respect for him—I do not think that he was listening to what I have just said in answer to his noble friend. All this Bill does is to replace the bar of the two-thirds majority which the Fixed-term Parliaments Act...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1590
House
House of Lords

The answer to the noble Baroness is this: if legislation is put before the House of Commons and it fails because there is no simple majority for it, there is a simple answer—the legislation fails. You do not have a situation that could go on for years in which a...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1590
House
House of Lords

But why should a Prime Minister who cannot get a majority of the House of Commons for an election be entitled to a Dissolution?

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1590
House
House of Lords

Because our Government need decision. If you have a situation in which you have paralysis in the House of Commons, it is in the national interest that this should be resolved. The way in which it has traditionally been resolved and would now be resolved again if this Bill were...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1590-1
House
House of Lords

We are talking about a resolution of the House of Commons. Can he give any circumstance —we are not talking about legislation; we are talking about resolution—where a resolution of the Commons was overturned by the courts or was even regarded as being justiciable by the courts?

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1591
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord talks about a resolution, but what he previously said was that the courts could not be imagined challenging any decision that obtained a majority in the House of Commons. It was to that observation that I replied. There are many examples and I refer him to the...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1591
House
House of Lords