Skip to main content

1-20 of 366 results for subject:Location

Subject X
Monuments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Monuments (366)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I added my name to these two amendments. I will add very briefly to the remarks that have already been made by the noble Lord, Lord Lisvane, in moving his amendment.

I referred earlier to the unsatisfactory nature of Committee, when all sorts of issues which could usefully have been dug...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1492
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also added my name to this amendment. I will be extremely brief: I support it.

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1492
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Lisvane and Lord Inglewood, for bringing forward Amendments 6 and 7. While we respect the spirit in which these amendments have been brought, we on the Official Opposition Benches cannot support the amendments. We are very concerned that both Amendments 6 and...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1492
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Lisvane and Lord Hodgson, and the noble Baronesses, Lady Fookes and Lady Walmsley, for Amendment 6, and the noble Lords, Lord Inglewood, Lord Hodgson, Lord Lisvane and Lord Strathcarron,

for Amendment 7. Both amendments seek to insert additional steps into the approvals...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 cc1492-3
House
House of Lords

I apologise for interrupting the Minister, but he has come to a point where he has just said “if” another planning inquiry is held. In Committee, he was asked on a number of occasions whether a planning inquiry would be held, and we were told that there might not be...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1493
House
House of Lords

My Lords, let me clarify my comments, because that was a slight misinterpretation of what I said in Committee. I said then that the designated Minister would decide how we would take the planning process forward. As part of a number of options, there could be written representations, there could...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1493
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister’s answer is extremely ambiguous.

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1493
House
House of Lords

With respect, I strongly disagree with the noble Baroness. The application is live. Subject to the passing of this Bill, there will be a new planning process, when the designated Minister will decide what he will take forward.

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1493
House
House of Lords

I am now getting more and more confused. The Minister has just said that there will be a new planning inquiry, or a new planning process, but before he said that there might be only a round table or written representations. He just used the word “new”—I heard it very...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1494
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly disagree with the characterisation of what I said. What I said was that the planning application was live, as it is, but that there will be a new planning process. The actual planning application has been quashed because of the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900....

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1494
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that the intent that the noble Lord, Lord Inglewood, and I had has been slightly misinterpreted. When the planning process—I use that general term, because, as we heard in answer to the question from the noble Lord, Lord Sassoon, it could have a number of different...

Member
Lord Lisvane (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 cc1494-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Inglewood

8: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause—

“Matters to be taken into account in determining planning application

Any determination involving consideration of any application to grant planning permission for any Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre in Victoria Tower Gardens must take into account all relevant matters at the...

Member
Lord Inglewood (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1495
House
House of Lords

I think this will be a very short debate, because the right thing for me to do—bearing in mind that the last round in the planning process led to the application being quashed, and therefore it no longer exists in law at all, which means that it has to be...

Member
Lord Inglewood (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1495
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I did not add my name to this amendment, but the point of it is that the entire circumstances in which planning permission was first granted, and the project was first mooted, have entirely changed. I will make one small point about that. My research shows that the...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 cc1495-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be very brief, but on this side of the Chamber, we feel that these amendments are unnecessary because, as I have said so many times today, the planning process that will follow the passage of the Bill is the correct place to raise those matters. We...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1496
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Inglewood, seeks to ensure that a decision on any planning application must take into account all relevant matters. This amendment is unnecessary. Planning decisions must be taken within a framework of statute and regulation, which Parliament has put into place...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1496
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I assume that the Minister, when he said, “seek to take that decision in accordance with the law”, will actually undertake to take the decisions in accordance with the law. I beg leave to withdraw.

Member
Lord Inglewood (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1497
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Deech

9: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause—

“Restoration and Renewal of Parliament not to be impeded

The activities described in section 1(1) may not be commenced on the land referred to in section 2 unless the authorities of both Houses of Parliament have certified that they are satisfied...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1497
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I now come to the elephant in the room. I wish to bring up the question of the impact of building a Holocaust memorial and underground learning centre in Victoria Tower Gardens. It will either render impossible restoration and renewal or make it more difficult and expensive. I...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 cc1497-8
House
House of Lords

I support the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, and her Amendment 9. With the then Clerk of the Parliaments, I commissioned the first ever condition and survey of the Palace in October 2011. That reported in March 2012; its principal conclusion was that doing nothing was not an option, and that...

Member
Lord Lisvane (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2025
Reference
846 c1499
House
House of Lords