Skip to main content

1-20 of 67 results for member:"Lord Hannay of Chiswick"

Subject X
Negotiations

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Negotiations (67)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, when I saw the title of the report that we are debating, which has been so excellently introduced by my noble friend Lord Boswell, I wondered whether our esteemed EU Select Committee was pulling our collective leg. Then I saw the date of the report—March last year—and realised...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2020
Reference
803 cc627-8
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Baroness explain why it is that she believes that the European Union is not behaving in a manner consistent with the political declaration when my noble friend’s report says quite explicitly that it is?

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2020
Reference
802 c1293
House
House of Lords

Well, my Lords, that really was back to 1958.

Were the coronavirus pandemic not dominating the public debate almost to the exclusion of everything else, the admirable and forensic report of your Lordships’

EU Select Committee, which was so excellently introduced by my noble friend Lord Kinnoull and which we are discussing...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2020
Reference
802 cc1293-5
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I can give the noble Viscount an answer to his question. The answer is no, it does not mean that. It could only mean that if the French agreed to make it mean that, and they will not.

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2020
Reference
802 c1304
House
House of Lords

Obviously the noble Lord did not listen very carefully to the quotation that I read from the joint declaration. It makes it quite clear that we recognise that geographical proximity, and the extent of our independence, require a level playing field. Perhaps he could answer that question.

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2020
Reference
802 c1312
House
House of Lords
Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2020
Reference
801 cc997-9
House
House of Lords
Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2020
Reference
801 c1002
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are here on a Saturday morning, holding an emergency debate on Brexit, for the first time since the Falklands War—which really was an emergency—and we are

doing so under false pretences. There is no such time-sensitive national emergency over Brexit, only an attempt by the Prime Minister...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2019
Reference
800 cc305-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in following the noble Lord, Lord Lilley, I suggest that he was far too modest when he recanted on his good work in agreeing the ending of the Uruguay Round and setting up both the World Trade Organization and the single market. I congratulate him. His success in...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2019
Reference
800 c108
House
House of Lords

I do not want to continue the battle of figures for too long but, of course, a large part of our trade with countries outside the European Union benefits enormously from the relationships which we, as a member of the European Union, have with those countries.

I was tempted to devote...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2019
Reference
800 cc109-111
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that that is very far from the truth. The reason it was not opposed here was because of the Salisbury convention, which says that, if a party wins an overall majority in an election with such an issue in its manifesto, this House will not...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2019
Reference
800 c111
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord speaks extraordinarily dismissively of having two referendums. Is that not a little insulting to the Government of Ireland and the Government of Denmark, who have done precisely that in various years? Might he not be a little more polite about that?

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2019
Reference
800 c150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister is repeating some figures that have been used again and again in this House and are completely worthless because the rise in the number of Indian students follows a drop of more than 50% in the previous years. If he does the arithmetic, he will discover...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2019
Reference
800 c155
House
House of Lords

Given that any delay would have to be decided collectively by the 28, I ask the Minister to answer a straightforward question: will the Government send a letter asking for a delay if 19 October arrives without a deal?

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
799 c2015
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister address this issue about standards? He seems not to have properly understood, if I may say so, what actually happens. We have higher standards now in many cases than the EU, but we are in the EU. Being

in the EU has not stopped us...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1946
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wonder if the Minister could answer a couple of questions, after one observation, which is that in order to reach a landing zone you have to take off first. The two questions I would like to ask are as follows.

On this vexed issue of consent, I do...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
799 c1863
House
House of Lords

I do not intend to prolong this historical debate, other than to say to the noble Lord that he is falling into the trap that an earlier speaker warned us about—he is being too Manichean. He is juxtaposing the Soviet Union threat, the NATO response and the European Union. It...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
799 c1159
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness asked some questions about the European attitude. The European attitude towards Iran is clear: it wishes to sustain the joint agreement, which stops Iran developing nuclear weapons, and to ease sanctions on Iran. Its position on Russia is clear: it intends to maintain sanctions against Russia, because...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
799 c1169
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the Bill, which is extremely necessary, timely and rather skilfully drafted. I shall not dwell long on the rather dispiriting debates we had yesterday. I note that when you are making sweet white wine, it is usual to leave the grapes on the vine until they...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
799 cc1182-3
House
House of Lords

The figure of £1 billion net that the Minister refers to is frequently contested because it appears to be gross and not to take account of the expenditure that the European Union would make in this country if we were still a member. Can he perhaps clarify that?

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
799 c1228
House
House of Lords