Skip to main content

1-20 of 729 results for subject:"Data processing"

Subject X
NHS

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
NHS (729)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Amendment 70 to clause 47 negatived on division (6 to 7). Amendment 48 to clause 47 negatived on division (6 to 7). Amendment 49 to clause 47 negatived on division (6 to 7). Clause 47, discussed with new clauses 7 and 8, agreed to. Clauses 48 to 50 agreed to....

Lead member
Karin Smyth
Answering member
Caroline Johnson
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Health Bill Committee
Date
2 July 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether the Section 254 direction under the Health and Social Care Act 2012 will be published and laid before Parliament for full scrutiny.

Asked by
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2026
Reference
7967
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 22/07/2025 from Baroness Blake of Leeds to Peers regarding the 10-Year Health Plan and points raised during the statement repeat announcing the plan: single-patient record, wearables and data security, fracture liaison services, neighbourhood health plans, delivery road map for the Plan, palliative care, mental health investment standard, and...

Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
22 July 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0533
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Date
8 July 2025
Reference
HC 790 2024-26
House
House of Commons

I know, but she is wonderful, so we will let her—or you will let her, Madam Deputy Speaker.

This is a really important point. Surely it cannot be impossible for us to find a technical solution. People who can develop AI—and they are now developing AI on their laptops, especially following...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 cc728-9
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Alice Macdonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c729
House
House of Commons

I thought that that might engender something.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c729
House
House of Commons

It was a pleasure to serve on the Bill Committee. May I take up the point about timelines in the new clause? The Minister has said that the reports must be made before the end of a period of 12 months, but, as other Members have said, there is a...

Member
Alice Macdonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c729
House
House of Commons

Obviously, a series of different things will happen. We will have to respond to the consultation at some point, and I guess that the Culture, Media and Sport Committee will want to respond as well. In the meantime, we will be running a working group. I am very happy to...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c730
House
House of Commons

I apologise if I have missed this, but has the Minister outlined when the Government will respond to the consultation?

Member
Marsha De Cordova (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c730
House
House of Commons

No, I have not—my hon. Friend has not missed anything. Obviously, we want to respond as soon as possible, but we have 11,500 consultation responses to consider.

Some issues have hardly been referred to in the public debate on this matter. One issue that Equity is understandably pursuing, and that we...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c730
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister envisage that any model of enforcement around transparency will be compulsory and not a voluntary system?

Member
Jonathan Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c730
House
House of Commons

By its nature, enforcement would have to be compulsory, but we are running ahead of ourselves, because nobody has actually come up with a system that has an enforcement mechanism. Who would do it? What body would do it? How would that body be resourced? That is one of the...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 cc730-1
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege to respond to this debate on behalf of His Majesty’s official Opposition, and to speak to the new clauses and amendments. This is an ambitious piece of legislation, which will enable us to harness data—the currency of our digital age—and use it in a way that...

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c732
House
House of Commons

Yes.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c732
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for making that statement at the Dispatch Box. As he knows, we need to have that formally, in writing, as a statement from the Government to make it absolutely clear, given that the consultation has muddied the waters.

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c732
House
House of Commons

I am sorry, but I said that in my speech, and I have said it several times in several debates previously.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c732
House
House of Commons

I would therefore be grateful if the Minister said why there remains uncertainty among creatives about the application of copyright in this area. Is that not why we need to move this forward?

I now turn to Government amendment 34 and others. I congratulate my noble Friend Baroness Owen on the...

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 cc732-3
House
House of Commons

I should have said earlier that, as the shadow Minister knows, in Committee we changed the clause on “soliciting” to one on “requesting” such an image, because in certain circumstances soliciting may require the exchange of money. That is why we now have the requesting offence.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c733
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his clarification and reiteration of that point, and again for his work with colleagues to take forward the issue, on which I think we are in unison across the House.

New clause 21 is on directions to public authorities on recording of sex data. One does...

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
766 c733
House
House of Commons