Skip to main content

1-20 of 155 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Offences against children

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Offences against children (155)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
23 January 2014
Reference
DEP2014-0101
House
House of Lords

Bearing in mind that this debate is about the programme motion, we would all like to be as brief as possible, while not prejudging the outcome of the vote, so that we do not have even less time to discuss these important issues. I share the concerns of the hon....

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1351-2
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1430
House
House of Commons

This is an important Bill, and it is worth putting on the record the fact that in Committee my hon. Friends and I had a fruitful set of debates with Ministers. There was important agreement on the means of increasing and improving police efficiency through, among other things, collaboration, and...

Member
David Ruffley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1351
House
House of Commons

In the 30 seconds left, may I sound a positive note? I welcome new clause 22, which supersedes what I have been trying to do for many years, namely increase the penalty for encryption of child abuse pornography that is tucked away in data, and failure to give the key....

Member
Paul Beresford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1442-3
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for his clarification, but do his proposals introduce any kind of grandfather rights for lap-dancing clubs that were opened, in good faith, under previous Government legislation?

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1410
House
House of Commons

Does not my hon. Friend think that the system as he has just outlined it could create anomalies? In neighbouring local authority areas, particularly within a conurbation, there could be one regime in place on one side of a borough border, and another on the other side. That is no...

Member
David Lepper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1412
House
House of Commons

The problem with the right hon. Gentleman's contention is that the process is likely to bring the law into disrepute. Injunctions against those under 18 are unenforceable. According to the response that we received from the Government today,""Injunctions must be enforceable and it is unlikely in practice that these injunctions...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1388-9
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1397
House
House of Commons

I think that we have to take one step back from those circumstances. We heard in Committee, and in the evidence sessions, about men who had come forward to say that they believed that women had been trafficked, or were being controlled for gain. They had alerted the women about...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1409-10
House
House of Commons

To clarify, when the Minister says that he wants strict liability in order to force men, if we can generalise, to consider the consequences of their actions, is he not saying that they should make inquiries as to whether the person is controlled for gain, or whatever the definition is?...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1409
House
House of Commons

Is it the intention of the Government, under the Bill, to close down lap-dancing clubs that were opened, in good faith, under previous legislation?

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1410
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for his remarks, because they go to the nub of why this is such an important part of the debate on an important part of the Bill. I have listened carefully to what he has said, and we must avoid in any...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1407
House
House of Commons

The Safety First coalition, which developed following the Ipswich murders, is very much against many of the measures in the Bill, simply because it believes that they will make women more vulnerable to attack. That is the strong view of other interested organisations, such as Royal College of Nursing, and...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1407
House
House of Commons

As I have tried to point out throughout my remarks, we believe that this debate will continue—it will do so this evening, and it will certainly do so in another place—but I reassure my right hon. Friend that I am not deaf to the remarks that I hope will be...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1407
House
House of Commons

I very much hope that the Minister will listen carefully, as I am the Member of Parliament in whose constituency two of those sad girls were found. I do not think that I can overstate the feeling locally that the proposals do not go far enough; nor can I overstate...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1407
House
House of Commons

Of course, Madam Deputy Speaker, it is a matter for your discretion, but I hope that my hon. Friend catches your eye, because I want to listen carefully to her remarks, as I do to those of other Members. She has a great deal to say about the psychological pressure...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1408-9
House
House of Commons

That illustrates the problem that I have in trying to get the Bill into the right form to satisfy as many Members as I can, if not all of them, while remaining true to the intention that we set out in the Bill. Very strong views have been expressed from...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1407-8
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will know that I have tabled amendments designed to address that problem, which relates to the point about enforceability made by my right hon. Friend the Member for Leicester, East (Keith Vaz). I hope that my right hon. Friend will be reassured by a meeting that I...

Member
Fiona Mactaggart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1408
House
House of Commons

The Minister's proposed definition, which severely waters down the Bill's original intention, will not cover any of the poor women who were killed in Ipswich. They were not forced, deceived or threatened. They were killed, because they were prostitutes, by a man who would face absolutely no pressure from any...

Member
Denis MacShane (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1406-7
House
House of Commons