Skip to main content

1-20 of 979 results for subject:Vetting

Subject X
Parliamentary scrutiny

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Parliamentary scrutiny (979)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Foreign Affairs Committee
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
HC 504 2026-27
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the answer of 28 April 2026 to Question 128726 on Lord Mandelson, whether Sir Adrian Fulford’s review into national security vetting will be laid before Parliament.

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 June 2026
Reference
3296
House
House of Commons

Speaker's statement on Parliamentary rules and courtesies. Ministerial statement on the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States. Zarah Sultana, Member for Coventry South, was named by the Speaker for disregarding the authority of the Chair (Standing Order No. 44). Motion that Zarah Sultana be suspended from...

Lead member
Keir Starmer
Department
Prime Minister
Type
Ministerial statements; Speaker's statements
Notes
Speaker's statement at c23
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 cc23-63
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister has chosen to blame his officials for this debacle, so can he confirm that he knows the names of the FCDO civil servants who made the decision to override UKSV on 29 January 2025—yes or no? Has he made the decision to suspend them all from duty,...

Member
David Reed (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c62
House
House of Commons

I have set out the facts to the House this afternoon. I have ordered a review of security vetting by Sir Adrian Fulford, so that if any further changes are needed, we can put them in place.

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c62
House
House of Commons

I understand that Peter Mandelson’s vetting clearance was conditional on his being accompanied to meetings with former clients, such as Palantir. Will the Prime Minister clarify why there is no record of his and Peter Mandelson’s meeting with Palantir in Washington, and will he tell the House what it was...

Member
Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c62
House
House of Commons

That was a routine meeting in the course of a visit I was on in the US.

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c62
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister is repeatedly telling us that either he was not told, or he was not allowed to be told, but what culture has he created around him and across the civil service that meant that no one felt that they could or should tell him this sensitive information?

Member
Sarah Bool (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c62
House
House of Commons

I remind the hon. Lady that, in the last two weeks, my senior officials have brought this to my attention, which is—[Interruption.] No, before the Guardian. They brought it to my attention on Tuesday evening. That is what led me to ask further questions and make this statement to the...

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c63
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister once promised to end the chaos, and to restore honesty and integrity to Government. Does he think that appointing a man who called a convicted child sex offender his “best pal”, and whose connections with Epstein were already well known, is consistent with that promise? If it...

Member
Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c63
House
House of Commons

I have accepted that I made an error in the appointment, and apologised to the victims, as I must.

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c63
House
House of Commons

On 4 February, my right hon. Friend the Leader of the Opposition asked the Prime Minister whether the vetting process had disclosed information about Epstein. The Prime Minister answered, “Yes, it did.” In his response to my right hon. Friend the Member for New Forest West (Sir Desmond Swayne), he...

Member
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c63
House
House of Commons

I was asked about the vetting process, and the due diligence is part of the vetting process. Rather than rest on a technicality, I gave the House the information that I had about what I knew from the due diligence. It was clear what the Leader of the Opposition was...

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c63
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister promised that, unlike the Tories, his Government would govern well and restore public trust, yet this whole sorry Mandelson saga has reinforced the belief, in Yeovil and beyond, that no Government or politician can change. Can the Prime Minister explain to my constituents why he ignored the...

Member
Adam Dance (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c63
House
House of Commons

I have dealt with that issue on a number of occasions.

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c63
House
House of Commons

With permission, Mr Speaker, I would like to provide the House with information that I now have about the appointment of Peter Mandelson as our ambassador to the United States.

Before I go into the details, I want to be very clear with this House that while this statement will focus...

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 cc23-6
House
House of Commons

I thank the Prime Minister for advance sight of his statement. His reputation is at stake, and everyone is watching, so it is finally time for the truth.

Earlier today, Downing Street admitted that the Prime Minister inadvertently misled the House. The Prime Minister has chosen not to repeat that from...

Member
Kemi Badenoch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 cc26-8
House
House of Commons

Let me respond to those points. First, when I found out what had happened on Tuesday evening last, I wanted to have answers to the questions of who had made the decision to give clearance on developed vetting contrary to the advice, why that was done, and who knew about...

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 cc28-9
House
House of Commons

The truth is that my Committee did ask. We asked on the record, and we got a partial truth that could hardly be the whole truth. We are on record as asking the very questions that hecklers on the Opposition Benches say should have been asked. The answers are there,...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c30
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for her question. Her Committee did ask relevant questions, and that is why I have indicated that it was unforgivable that the Foreign Secretary was asked to sign a statement in response to those very questions without being told about the recommendation. The questions...

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c30
House
House of Commons