Skip to main content

1-20 of 177 results for subject:"Ex gratia payments"

Subject X
Pensioners

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Pensioners (177)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Does the hon. Gentleman not feel, however, that the problem remains that the whole thing will be governed by the ultimate cap? That is the difficulty that faces all Equitable Life policyholders.

Member
Mike Weir (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c329
House
House of Commons

I have confidence in the Treasury trying to sort this out—I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will not be surprised to hear that. However, I am concerned about anything that pushes this matter into the long grass. We do not need any more delays caused by trying to set...

Member
Anne Main (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c329
House
House of Commons

I spoke about this last time we discussed the matter. Given that the message to savers from the previous Government was non-existent or at least negative, does my hon. Friend think the message that the present Government are sending to savers is adequate? Are we saying clearly, ““We understand that...

Member
Baroness Bray of Coln (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c331
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Our obligation is to compensate people for regulatory failure by the Government when they were the regulator of Equitable Life. The scheme is not an open-ended compensation scheme. It is very focused, and that was the ombudsman's recommendation. Her locus in this matter is...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c318
House
House of Commons

I have no reluctance in paying tribute to the hon. Gentleman for his independence of thought and the campaign that he has waged on this issue. He has been not a lone voice, but one of very few Labour voices addressing the matter. On pre-992 annuitants, how on earth could...

Member
Jonathan Evans (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c295
House
House of Commons

I tabled my amendment because, although I am well aware that the Bill is an enabling measure, I feel strongly that a group of Equitable Life policyholders has been unfairly excluded from the compensation scheme that the Government have put in place. You will be pleased to know, Mr Evans,...

Member
Fabian Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c293-4
House
House of Commons

I, too, pay tribute to the hon. Gentleman for his work. It has been a pleasure to work with him on this issue and I support his amendment. In a nutshell, on the moral case, the parliamentary ombudsman and Sir John Chadwick both said in writing in advance that all...

Member
Stephen Lloyd (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c296
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his kind words. I hope that in continuing my comments I shall answer his question. I have long believed that the Equitable saga is a moral issue for us in Parliament. We sought, through the Financial Services Authority, to regulate financial institutions such as...

Member
Fabian Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c295-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 1, page 1, line 7, at end insert—

Member
Fabian Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c293
House
House of Commons

I want to make some more progress. The fact that with-profits annuitants who bought their annuities before 1 September 1992 have seen a reduction in the level of payments that they currently receive from their annuities is a result of poor investment market performance and the fact that their earlier...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c321-3
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c321
House
House of Commons

I was trying to make two points. First, those policyholders were excluded from the calculation of relative loss as a consequence of the ombudsman's findings and her view on when maladministration had taken place. According to the example that I have given, they would not have suffered loss in any...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c321
House
House of Commons

I shall speak to amendments 3 and 4, which stand in my name and the names of my hon. Friends. Amendment 3 would enshrine in the Bill the fact that the design and administration of any payments scheme should be independent of Government. It is pretty straightforward and simple—in fact,...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c326-8
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 3, page 1, line 7, at end insert—

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c326
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for his clear explanation of his rationale for the compensation scheme. I am afraid, however, that I still do not accept the argument that the cut-off should be absolute and rigid and that those who took out annuities before 1 September 1992 should not...

Member
Fabian Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c323
House
House of Commons

Obviously we are waiting to hear what the Government will say about their amendment, but the other amendments—including the new clause proposed by the hon. Member for Harrow East (Bob Blackman)—are in essence an attempt to ensure that there is a sense of competent independence in how the scheme is...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c328-9
House
House of Commons

I shall speak to new clause 1, which I tabled, but I made a long speech on the earlier group of amendments and I do not want to repeat all the points I made then. We need to make the whole process clear, transparent and independent of Government so that...

Member
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c328
House
House of Commons

The amendment is intended to draw out more information specifically about the timing of the compensation payment scheme that the Financial Secretary envisages. In particular, we wish to ensure that the Treasury will lay before Parliament details of the timing and planned dates for payments no later than three months...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c336
House
House of Commons

Let me deal with amendments 5 and 8. We have stated that our ambition is to commence payments in the middle of next year. As the Committee is aware, we have made great progress on this issue. Within six months of coming to office, we have published Sir John's report...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c337-8
House
House of Commons

I rise to support amendment 8. I do not want to go over all the ground that we covered in debating the previous amendments, but the purpose of the amendment is precisely what we talked about earlier. Hon. Members intervened to say, ““Let's get this done. Let's get it over...

Member
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c336-7
House
House of Commons