Skip to main content

1-20 of 151 results for subject:Hacking

Subject X
Powers

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Powers (151)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My rt hon Friend the Minister of State for Security (Tom Tugendhat) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

The Government is reviewing the Computer Misuse Act 1990 (CMA / the Act) and this statement provides an update on the progress of the review.

It is essential that the UK...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
HLWS536
House
House of Lords

The Government is reviewing the Computer Misuse Act 1990 (CMA / the Act) and this statement provides an update on the progress of the review.

It is essential that the UK has the right legislative framework to allow us to tackle the harms posed to our citizens, businesses and government...

Member
Tom Tugendhat (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
HCWS546
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Consultation papers; Deposited papers
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
DEP2023-0108
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Lords, we discussed this issue in Committee when the noble Baroness tabled an amendment seeking to introduce a cause of action which would

allow victims of unlawful interception to bring a civil claim. As she is aware, the Investigatory Powers Bill already contains a criminal offence where a person...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2016
Reference
774 cc1808-1810
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 180 not moved.] [Amendment No. 181 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.] Clause 43 agreed to.

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622
House
House of Lords

Would my noble friend be kind enough to confirm that I have heard and interrupted her correctly: that this is about serious alleged offences having taken place in the United States and that the evidence, or the principal evidence, for those alleged offences is in the United States and would...

Member
Lord Christopher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c649
House
House of Lords

That is not right. Section 71 sets out clearly that the evidence would have to be sufficient to justify the issue of a warrant for the arrest of a person accused of that offence.

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c642
House
House of Lords

I—

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c643
House
House of Lords

I support Amendment No. 186, particularly in the context of the journey that the Minister is about to make to Washington— slightly humiliatingly, it seems to me—to plead for our rights. I do so more generally in real dismay atthe turn that events have taken concerning our arrangements for extradition...

Member
Lord Mayhew of Twysden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c634-5
House
House of Lords

My noble friend will understand when I say that I am a little disappointed by some of what he has said. In inspections of local government there is an element of peer review. Indeed, when the Audit Commission undertakes inspections, the peer review is invaluable. I do not understand why...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c600-1
House
House of Lords

I confess that to give the noble Lord a full explanation about the latter issue would take a little time, not least because of the complexities of the matters raised by the noble Earl, Lord Northesk, who is not in his place. I ask the noble Lord if he will...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c694
House
House of Lords

May I ask the noble Baroness a question that may be in the minds of many Members of the Committee, especially the non-lawyers? We have heard a very engaged debate, conducted on this side by two highly distinguished Queen’s Counsel—experienced lawyers—supported by no fewer than four other Queen’s Counsel, some...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c648
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for that sympathetic reply and I think that progress is being made here. I am also grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Hylton, for his support. He is absolutely right to point out that, when we talk about offences in these terms, we are...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622
House
House of Lords

My understanding is that our amendments cover the same ground, and as I advised the Committee we had a suspicion that the amendment proposed by the noble Earl, Lord Northesk, was technically deficient. We would prefer our amendment to his, and I thought that the noble Earl was going to...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c610
House
House of Lords

The amendment would remove the requirement for the Audit Commission and the Auditor General for Wales to work jointly with the new inspectorate to inspect police authorities. The involvement of the Audit Commission in this area is nothing new; it has a long history of playing a valuable role in...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c602
House
House of Lords

It is the reality of where we are. The United States has a system that is part federal and part state. Within that system there is an allowance for difference. We cannot recast the United States into a way that we would prefer. I turn to some of the very...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c647
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 194D to 194F: Page 158, line 18, leave out from first ““officers”” to ““registered”” in line 19 and insert ““in relation to parenting orders made on the application of local authorities in Wales or of”” Page 158, line 30, leave out from ““29),”” to end of line...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c695
House
House of Lords

had given notice of her intention to move Amendment No. 182: After Clause 43, insert the following new clause- ““Penal custody for children PENAL CUSTODY FOR CHILDREN (1) No child shall be detained in a young offender institution or a secure training centre. (2) ““Child”” means a person under the...

Member
Baroness Linklater of Butterstone (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622
House
House of Lords

I am sure that that can be arranged.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 185A: Page 36, line 12, at end insert- ““( ) Nothing in this section shall authorise the disclosure of documents or information subject to legal privilege.”” The noble Baroness said: I rise briefly to movethis amendment only because it was originally not grouped with Amendment No. 185...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622-3
House
House of Lords