Skip to main content

1-20 of 118 results for subject:Forestry

Subject X
Public finance

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Public finance (118)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I rise very briefly just to say that it is a very unusual experience to find that one of my co-signatories to an amendment is a government Minister and that I look forward to it happening more and more in the future. I say that in the spirit in which...

Member
Lord Clark of Windermere (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c833-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is not the case. I am not sure that the advice which the noble Lord has received was necessarily—dare I put it this way—as accurate as it might have been. Anyway, the simple fact is that the Forestry Commission, along with others, will have to take its...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c833
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not wish to detain your Lordships with other matters, but I should like to ask the Minister about my noble friend Lord Clark’s question on the cumulative 15 per cent, which was followed up by my noble friend Lord Judd. My understanding of the Minister’s reply...

Member
Lord Williams of Elvel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c826
House
House of Lords

Clearly, CRB checks will be relevant. I cannot immediately answer whether they have to be done by the individuals themselves or by their businesses to ensure that they are employing fit and proper people. I would have to write to the noble Lord. The registering of these individuals is another...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c914
House
House of Lords

Would that be a new regulatory body for England or for the United Kingdom? If only for England, what will the situation be in other parts of United Kingdom?

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c913
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment is on the abolition of the Security Industry Authority. I pay tribute to my noble friend Lady Henig, who has been its chair. My Government established the SIA in 2004 to reduce criminality in the security profession and to raise standards in the industry. This is...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c902
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether the noble Lord—as he says, both of us know the Pennines well—will agree that when a region such as the north-west finally gets a complete set of local enterprise partnerships, or LEPs, whatever pattern it is, what will happen—and it is already being discussed—is that at regional...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c892
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord, but he has twice mentioned Sir John Banham, and his last reference was in terms of a scandal. Will he make it clear to the Committee that if scandal there be, it is not to be laid at the door of Sir...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c864
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my thanks to my noble friend Lord Taylor for the dedicated way in which he has applied himself to considering the criticisms of the Bill that were made during the earlier stages of debate. I congratulate him on the generous way in which he has involved...

Member
Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c801
House
House of Lords

I could not agree more with the noble Lord. Of course that is what is going to happen. Something is being tossed away needlessly by the Government in a very hasty decision, without due thought being given to either region. I certainly agree with him that these things will need...

Member
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c892
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, am a supporter of what NESTA has done and of its very innovative work and enormously important initiatives. I looked with some puzzlement at the Government’s proposals and join my noble friend in asking some further questions to see whether we can be clear about what...

Member
Lord Dubs (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c803
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak briefly as a great admirer of NESTA, an organisation that works in an exciting and important area of our society to create a viable commercial future for science, technology and the arts. NESTA’s core objective is to combine capital investment with non-financial support to...

Member
Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c803-4
House
House of Lords

44: Schedule 1, page 17, line 8, leave out ““National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.””

Member
Lord Warner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c801
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this new mood of enthusiasm for constructive scrutiny, I rise to speak to the amendment standing in my name and in the names of my noble friends which would remove NESTA from Schedule 1. My purpose in tabling this amendment is to find out why the Government...

Member
Lord Warner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c802
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my name is attached to the amendment and I fully support what my noble friend has said about the concerns and needs of the railway heritage sector. I congratulate him on the work that he has put in over many years to look after and preserve the heritage...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c809
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in a single sentence I hope that my noble friend the Minister will be able to point actively to a secure and active home for railway heritage preservation.

Member
Earl of Mar and Kellie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c809
House
House of Lords

46: Schedule 1, page 17, line 10, leave out ““Railway Heritage Committee.””

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c806
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very pleased to continue the mood of co-operation and friendliness between the various parts of the House in relation to my Amendment 46, which is supported by two of my noble friends and by the noble Lord, Lord Inglewood, on the Benches opposite. I start by...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c806-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Warner, for introducing this amendment, and the noble Lords, Lord Dubs and Lord Evans of Temple Guiting, for their contributions, which give me an opportunity to explain how the Government see the role of NESTA. It is government policy to reduce the...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c804-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his full explanation. I am still just a shade puzzled as to what will happen if the Charity Commission does not accept that the purposes defined by Parliament meet its requirements as to a charitable purpose. Many of those purposes defined...

Member
Lord Warner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2011
Reference
725 c805-6
House
House of Lords