Skip to main content

1-20 of 314 results for subject:Modernisation

Subject X
Public participation

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Public participation (314)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Debate on a motion to approve proposals in the Modernisation of the House Select Committee first report of session 2005/06 (HC 1097) regarding the committal of bills to committees with powers to take evidence and related matters. Motion on new Standing Orders for legislative process agreed on division (223 to...

Lead member
Jack Straw
Answering member
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Debates
Notes
Daily part printing error - division (223 to 172) should be (323 to 172).
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c304-422, (corrigendum) 459
House
House of Commons

There are nine other motions covering the legislative process, the communications allowance, September sittings and other matters and I will deal with them in that order. As the House has just agreed, it is for the convenience of the House that they should be debated in one block. Let me...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c304-6
House
House of Commons

I very much welcome the development of a wider use of the Special Standing Committee procedure, which will help to focus minds on the purposes of Bills rather than just on their wording. Will the Leader of the House consider an aspect of Government practice that might help that process...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c306
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That this House welcomes the First Report from the Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons on the Legislative Process (HC 1097); approves in particular the proposals for the committal of bills to committees with powers to take evidence to become the normal practice for...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c304
House
House of Commons

Surely, in the context of programming, which I regard as necessary but requiring flexibility, the issue should be who determines the flexibility. The otherwise innovative and welcome Modernisation Committee report does not tackle the management of programming. Would not it be better if it were undertaken under the auspices of...

Member
John Bercow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c320-1
House
House of Commons

I aim to cover the subjects in the order in which they are set out in the various motions, as the Leader of the House did so comprehensively in his speech and in his generous responses to requests to intervene. On the right hon. Gentleman’s last comment, the point of...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c320
House
House of Commons

Indeed. The power will allow a relatively large number of Members to speak briefly towards the end of a debate. The hon. Member for Buckingham cannot have it both ways. If I give way to hon. Members, I am bound to speak for longer than I anticipated. The power was...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c319
House
House of Commons

Except for the Leader of the House.

Member
John Bercow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c319
House
House of Commons

He should chair it.

Member
John Bercow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c321
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has moved on to the subject of programming, which I was about to address. He has raised it in reference to the possibility of a business management committee, an issue that my hon. Friend the Member for Macclesfield (Sir Nicholas Winterton) has long supported—

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c321
House
House of Commons

I strongly agree with the right hon. Lady’s last point. The world outside thinks that it is nonsense that we debate legislation after it has come into effect. Does she agree that both Houses ought to be able to amend secondary legislation, rather than just being presented with it on...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c322
House
House of Commons

That suggestion has not been received with complete approval in all parts of the House, although my hon. Friend the Member for Macclesfield does have a fine record as a member of the Chairmen’s Panel. I shall be entirely honest with my hon. Friend the Member for Buckingham (John Bercow):...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c321-2
House
House of Commons

Since all the modernisation—not enough in my view—has occurred, the House sits for longer. There is no question of hon. Members not doing their primary duty of scrutinising and passing legislation. I voted in favour of September sittings, but today I intend to vote against them, because they do not...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c318
House
House of Commons

I shall give way briefly, but I am conscious that I have already spoken for 47 minutes and that others wish to contribute.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c318
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend give way?

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c318
House
House of Commons

I hope that my hon. Friend will be able to put that point to the House. I supported that argument in 2002, but we must take account of our experience since then, which is that the business of the House in September has not been especially substantial. However, it is...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c318
House
House of Commons

If I can catch the Speaker’s eye, I hope later to speak to my proposed amendment to the effect that September sittings should continue. When we talk about allowances and all the rest—I do not necessarily object to them—should we not also bear in mind that the overriding responsibility of...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c317-8
House
House of Commons

Now is not the moment to debate why the European Scrutiny Committee has a discretion to sit in private. As the right hon. Gentleman knows, I have given evidence before it in public. The wider issue is complicated and we are still examining the Modernisation Committee’s important recommendations. My right...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c319
House
House of Commons

The Leader of the House started his speech by saying that the public should understand our procedures better. He knows that the European Scrutiny Committee meets in private by Standing Order. Although it resolved in the previous Parliament to sit in public, the Government ignored that. Even hon. Members, let...

Member
David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c319
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I must make progress on the remaining motions, beginning with that on sub judice. The reports from the Procedure Committee, for which we thank the previous Chairman, the hon. Member for Macclesfield (Sir Nicholas Winterton) and the current Chairman, the right hon. Member...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
451 c318-9
House
House of Commons