Skip to main content

1-20 of 771 results for subject:Publicity

Subject X
Public participation

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Public participation (771)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Amendment 5 to schedule 24 negatived on division (4 to 9). Schedule 24, discussed with new clause 24, agreed to. Clause 56 agreed to. Clause 57 agreed to on division (9 to 3). Amendment 250 to schedule 25, discussed with new clause 55, negatived on division (4 to 8). Schedule...

Lead member
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Answering member
Paul Holmes
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Committee
Date
23 October 2025
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps his Department is taking to (a) publicise the Period Products Scheme and (b) increase school participation in that scheme.

Asked by
Tulip Siddiq (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 December 2020
Reference
124813
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 10/06/2019 from Lord Young of Cookham to Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town regarding points raised in the Census (Return Particulars and Removal of Penalties) Bill debate: promotion of the 2021 Census and the veterans question in the Census. 2p.

Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
10 June 2019
Reference
DEP2019-0631
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Andrea Leadsom
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
SI 2017/585
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL). Lords Report stage first day. New clause (Amendment 27) debated and withdrawn. Adjourned.

Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c139-222
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we debated this a little in Grand Committee and I am happy to try to reassure noble Lords that their concerns are misplaced. In fact, I suggest that Amendment 37 might have the opposite effect to the one intended. The petitions regime, which this chapter introduces, does not...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c189-91
House
House of Lords

Amendment 59 59: Clause 13, leave out Clause 13

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c203
House
House of Lords

Amendment 71 71: Clause 16, page 10, line 23, after "authority" insert "or relevant person from any of the organisations set out in section 2(2)(a) and (c) to (f)"

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c212
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I absolutely appreciate that the noble Lord is trying to be helpful by tabling Amendment 63. We debated this in Committee, and I am afraid that we disagree about what is to be achieved by this indicative list. I cannot add a huge amount to what I said...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c208-9
House
House of Lords

No, my Lords, I am dealing with the business that has been called—Amendment 82. That is what I am going to speak to. I am very grateful to the Conservative Chief Whip for putting on record that there are still Conservatives in the House, even though they remain silent except...

Member
Lord Tope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c216
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Baroness for the way in which she opened the debate on her amendments. I am pleased to know that we share so many of the assumptions about the values of local authorities and democratic arrangements. What divides us is not principle...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c149-52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Tope, for the gracious way in which he introduced this first debate on Report. We went over this Bill in great detail in Committee and I am very glad to share our understanding with him. Clearly we are all very much in...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c143-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that. If that information could be given before the deadline for tabling amendments for Third Reading, it would be extremely helpful to all of us. Amendment 21 agreed.

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c175
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I associate myself with these amendments and support them. I should declare an interest as it is the first time that I have spoken in this debate. I follow the footsteps of my noble friend Lord Greaves, and I have clocked up 13, perhaps 14, years in local...

Member
Baroness Maddock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c154
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I supported the noble Lord, Lord Low, when he moved similar amendments in Grand Committee, and I still support the sentiment which lies behind them. In response to the noble Lord at Committee, the noble Lord, Lord Patel, rightly pointed out that there is an existing duty in...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c154-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords will recall that I moved the amendments in this group in Committee. I bring them back again today because I support the duties contained in Chapter 1 but I want to see disabled people receive the full benefit of them. The amendments would require authorities to...

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c152-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for the fact that I have not spoken previously on this Bill, but, with the leave of the House, I support the amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Low. We were debating the Disabled Persons (Independent Living) Bill in this House last Friday...

Member
Baroness Wilkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c153-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I address this group of amendments, I put on record the recognition for the amount of work that the noble Lord, Lord Low, and the noble Baroness, Lady Wilkins, have done over the years in support of fighting—rightly—for the rights of people with a range of disabilities....

Member
Lord Patel of Bradford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c155-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her detailed response. I continue to have some concerns about the detail but, at this stage, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 3 withdrawn.

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c152
House
House of Lords

Amendment 4 4: Clause 1, page 2, line 7, at end insert— "( ) The duty under subsection (1) includes in particular a duty to provide relevant information in formats accessible to people with disabilities."

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
709 c152
House
House of Lords