Skip to main content

1-20 of 156 results for subject:Subscriptions

Subject X
Satellite communications

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Satellite communications (156)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I still contend that that is an extrapolation. We are talking about a graduated response, but there is an assumption that somehow no one will respond positively and that everyone will carry on being a serial transgressor. Of course I cannot predict this, but we are not embarking on a...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c468-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to come back to the question of figures, I really do not think the Government can get away with starting this great moral panic about the state of our creative industries and then, when relevant figures are quoted, say that there is no basis for them. There either...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c469
House
House of Lords

I have acknowledged the importance of this matter but we have not started a moral panic. We have not used what I once described in a previous Bill as a piece of Lucasian hyperbole. Neither do I accept the disparaging and unfortunate remark of the noble Earl, Lord Erroll, when...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c469
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand the important point that the noble Lord makes. The code is important because it introduces flexibility in way that the primary legislation cannot. That is why the primary legislation is bound to be somewhat starker and less sophisticated than the code can be, and addresses itself...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c461
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister hangs on to the principle that the subscriber must be the one with whom the buck stops. I can see the practicality of that; the question is then how to make that practically liveable-with. Coming back to what the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, has said, we...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c461-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister talked about darker purposes. No one quarrels with the concept of the real transgressors, but the whole discussion today has been about trying to protect those who are innocent or unknowing about what is happening and the use that is being made of their communal wi-fi...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c461
House
House of Lords

That is always a defence in terms of any ongoing sanction. However, they do not need a defence to the first letter because it merely indicates that the practice should cease. That process is reasonable enough, is it not?

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c458
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister admit that we should not attach a liability to someone who has done all that could be reasonably be expected of them to behave correctly?

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c458
House
House of Lords

Let me be clear about one aspect which has clouded this debate and ought not be introduced again because we have been round the course before. We are not talking about heavy sanctions at this stage but about letters which will be sent out where activity has gone on, perhaps...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c458
House
House of Lords

So I am not the subscriber on the parliamentary network, Parliament is; or I am the subscriber although the contract is not with me. Which is it?

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c458
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Lord enlighten me, and indeed I suspect everybody in the technical world, as to how it is possible to identify that your network has been hijacked?

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c459
House
House of Lords

That is right. It is a defence if the subscriber can identify that the connection has been hijacked in circumstances where they could in no conceivable way be held responsible.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c459
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is being a little disingenuous. We are not talking about simply who receives the letter; the question of the subscriber runs through all the gradations of action. The only person against whom action can be taken under these provisions is the subscriber. The question of the noble...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c459
House
House of Lords

At this stage, how has the Minister arrived at the assessment that we are not facing half a million disconnections? The noble Earl gave a figure of 7 million people doing this, and we might reasonably assume that, despite this legislation, a number will go on doing this. What assessment...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c468
House
House of Lords

I am dismissing the figures not lightly but seriously, because I do not think that they are based on any validated or credible evidence.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c468
House
House of Lords

There can be no evidence because we are going into unknown territory, but the British Phonographic Industry has told me that the figure is 6.5 million, and the Creative Coalition Campaign gave me the figure of 7 million that I just gave the Committee. Those are presumably well researched figures....

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c468
House
House of Lords

In response to the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, I agree with everything he said about what is necessary. Within this framework, of course I am identifying that the subscriber is responsible. If it reached the stage that the subscriber had got past the early stage and the issue was of...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c462
House
House of Lords

It may assist the noble Lord to know that if you download from home, you are going straight out on to the internet rather than the parliamentary system, even if you are also getting e-mails over the virtual private network, so what you are downloading at that point cannot be...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c462
House
House of Lords

52: Clause 4, page 6, line 19, at end insert— "( ) sets out the value of the infringement on the basis described in the initial obligations;"

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c463
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been an interesting debate. I thank all noble Lords who have drawn the Minister out to get at least the statement he made in the last 30 seconds. The clause is remarkably sloppily drafted; noble Lords are right that we do not know what is meant...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c462-3
House
House of Lords