Skip to main content

1-20 of 81 results for member:"Lord Hannay of Chiswick"

Subject X
Security

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Security (81)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I wish briefly to speak to Amendment 40 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Callanan. I am struck by the fact that, in all his interventions so far in these debates—at Second Reading, in Committee and, now, on Report—he has never referred at all to the...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 cc959-964
House
House of Lords

The Minister is right when he says that the threat from the Arctic to the NATO area is increasing, with the melting of the ice and many other factors. When the Secretary of State for Defence has a first contact with his new US opposite number, who has just been...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2025
Reference
843 c139
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the second time in recent years that this House has reported on and debated Britain’s overall Arctic policy, this second debate having been excellently introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Ashton of Hyde. That is to this House’s credit, because that dimension of our external policies,...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2025
Reference
842 cc879-881
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a triple congratulations is surely in order for this debate: first, to the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, who has obtained a topical and substantive issue for us to cover; secondly, to the Government, for having set out so clearly in the gracious Speech the twin objectives of their...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 October 2024
Reference
839 cc2198-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the report we are debating, so admirably introduced by the noble Earl, Lord Kinnoull, who contributed to great effect to its production, is quite simply the first overall analysis of the future development of the UK’s

post-Brexit relationship with the EU by either House of Parliament since we...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 September 2023
Reference
832 cc1470-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister recognise that yesterday’s Ostend meeting showed how much overlap there is between EU and NATO responsibilities, particularly in the North Sea? Does she not feel that the NATO strategy adopted last summer—that non-EU members of NATO and EU members should be working together—applies precisely to...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2023
Reference
829 c1106
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the report we are debating, so well introduced by my noble friend Lord Ricketts—I was his predecessor but three as chair of that sub-committee—may be a bit dated, unfortunately like most of the reports we debate these days, but it brings home one very salient point: our country’s...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2022
Reference
819 cc1673-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I personally very much welcome the work the Government have done in putting together a really strong sanctions package and persuading other countries to come in the direction we wish to go. But I asked two questions in the debate on Friday that were not replied to. I...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2022
Reference
819 cc900-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this debate. I regret having to begin my contribution to it with a procedural issue, which is the lengthening gap between the publication of Select Committee reports and the holding of debates on them. In the case of this report, it is well over a year....

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 cc293-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the parliamentary proceedings in which we are participating are a travesty. How else can you describe a Bill set to go through all its processes in one day; a Bill endorsing an agreement of more than 1,200 pages; a Bill accompanied by a distinctly partisan summary circulated by...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1859-1860
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister perhaps address the part of the Question related to the Persian Gulf, which she managed to pass over in total silence in her original reply? Would she not agree that probably the best way to strengthen maritime security in the Persian Gulf is to work with our other European allies to get a dialogue going about how to preserve the nuclear agreement with Iran and how to avoid tensions, which risk spiralling out of control?

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
799 c1143
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the report we are debating today is complex and often a bit on the technical side. All the more credit, therefore, goes to the committee’s chair, the noble Lord, Lord Howell of Guildford, for guiding us towards a range of clear recommendations and for having introduced the report...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc182-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the answer to the question we are debating today—whether the recent EU-west Balkans summit in Sofia has

strengthened support for EU enlargement—can be provided quickly, clearly and shamefully. It is no. Support for EU enlargement since the Sofia summit has not been strengthened. If anything, it has been...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2019
Reference
798 cc56-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister be so kind as to say what the extradition arrangements will be for each of the 27 member states on 30 March in the event of no deal? If she does not have those details at her fingertips, could she write to me and ensure that the letter gets here before 30 March?

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c987
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to follow the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, and I agree with much of what he said. This is obviously a crucial moment for the outcome of this negotiation. It matters a lot to this country, and it matters a lot to this House. The delay...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2019
Reference
795 cc16-8
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Baroness think again about her answer to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace of Tankerness? This is the third time that we have been round this course. Surely it is clear in the documents negotiated by the Prime Minister that, if there is a matter of...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 November 2018
Reference
794 c512
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for the Statement. I agree with those who say that this is a highly aspirational document. I lighted upon a sentence which says that,

“a fair and appropriate financial contribution”,

will be made. Perhaps the noble Baroness could say something about how long she thinks it would...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2018
Reference
794 cc401-2
House
House of Lords

As the noble and learned Lord seems to be drawing to the end of his remarks and has not yet answered my question, I wondered whether he would have a shot at it now. I asked how he would construe the provision that the arbitration panel may not rule on...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c229
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the three principal documents that we are looking at today are very different in nature. A sketchy seven-page document on the all-important new relationship between the UK and the EU is so skimpy as to be almost laughable, and there I agree very much with the noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 cc216-7
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister explain how this exclusion of the European Court of Justice will apply to the operation of the European arrest warrant, which involves individuals and not Governments?

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 July 2018
Reference
792 c1464
House
House of Lords