Skip to main content

1-20 of 163 results for subject:Dissolution

Subject X
Speaker's certificates

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Speaker's certificates (163)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

How grateful I am for all that. I know that the Minister will have listened to it all. To go back to my point, the noble and learned Lord is making us choose between five and four years, but the arguments that his Government put forward are all on the...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c511-2
House
House of Lords

Am I given to understand that the reason for not giving this Bill any pre-legislative scrutiny is fear that it may not get through?

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c499
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think most would agree that there is merit in the arguments on both sides of the debate on whether the term of Parliament should be fixed. However, if there is merit in the argument for the term being fixed at five years, it is merit that passed...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c493-4
House
House of Lords

I choose my words carefully and refer solely to national legislatures. If we are to have two mechanisms for triggering an election, then we could usefully explore the alternatives to what it proposed. Do we need the subsection at all? In evidence to the Constitution Committee, David Howarth noted that...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c564
House
House of Lords

I am interested in the noble Lord’s arguments. He knows that his party’s policy for many years was, honourably, that there should be fixed terms for four years. Did he support that policy? If not, was he always a five-year man? If he did support that policy, when was it...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c489
House
House of Lords

I cannot speak for what is going on in the other place at the moment. However, if my memory serves me correctly, the Minister followed Jo Grimond into the House of Commons in 1983, so he will appreciate as a former Scottish Member that on a Thursday there were votes...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c509
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am tempted briefly to intervene, partly because of what the noble Lord, Lord Martin, said. I always remember that one of his predecessors—the late, great Jack Weatherill, who many of your Lordships will remember from his time in this House—once said to me, ““If you have any...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c485-6
House
House of Lords

I agree with the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Stirrup, about the length of the period between elections in normal times. If it is agreed that five years will be written into legislation, over a period of 20 years the electorate will be denied an opportunity to go to the...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c483-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure that I would be happy with the proposal that the noble Lord, Lord Cormack, made, although I can see merit in it. However, I was very interested in what he said about the Bill laying bare the criticism that has been made of the...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c486-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment goes to the heart of the Bill in that it seeks to reduce the period of a fixed-term Parliament from five years to four years. This important Bill may well bring about a significant change to our politics by changing the position from a situation in...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c475-9
House
House of Lords

11: Clause 1, page 1, line 7, leave out ““fifth”” and insert ““fourth””

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c475
House
House of Lords

I will make a brief speech since I have put my name to the amendment. In the course of his reply at Second Reading, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace of Tankerness, described the question now before the Committee as ““the key issue””. He went to on to say...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c479-80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am tempted to talk about the word ““consensus””. I said on day one of the Committee that New Zealand had a three-year term of Parliament. When the cut in the number of UK seats was devised as a consensus between the two parts of the coalition, I...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c481-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a key argument advanced by the Government in favour of five-year fixed terms as opposed to those of four years is that it will improve overall government effectiveness, because there will be fewer elections and therefore less distraction to the Government in having to fight them. In mulling...

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c481
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Lord comment on the point that all the experts who gave evidence, both in the House of Lords committee and in the House of Commons, came down in favour of four years? These were experts on our constitution, both in law and in practice.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c502
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I decided to intervene briefly in this debate because I felt that the arguments advanced by my noble friend Lord Armstrong at Second Reading had not been given voice and because he was not in his place. He now is in his place and I think that he...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c501-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if we are to have a fixed-term Parliament, and I believe that we should not, we will do less damage if we fix it at four years rather than at five. I rather agree with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, and with my noble...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c501
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord, Lord Rennard, care to comment on the fact that the first reason he gave for changing his mind applied before he espoused and promoted his manifesto for the election? Between his saying, ““Vote Liberal Democrat; we’re in favour of four years”” and reaching the conclusion that...

Member
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c500
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness, particularly for her latter point. In response to her first point, about how I should have known all this before 2005, I say very honestly that if all of us ignored all the evidence and all that we had learnt during the past six years,...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c500-1
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether my noble friend recalls that not only the noble Lord, Lord Wills, but all his political colleagues in another place promoted that legislation in terms precisely of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act and the control of the expenditure of political parties. Why have the noble...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c500
House
House of Lords