Skip to main content

1-20 of 228 results for member:"Lord Coaker"

Subject X
Special educational needs

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Special educational needs (228)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage first day. Clause 1 agreed to. Schedule 1 agreed to. Clauses 2 and 3 agreed to. Clause 4 under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Answering member
Earl of Minto
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 cc327-1244GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Earl, Lord Minto, for his remarks and the points that he made. I also thank other noble Lords.

Again, let me say something about the general point around the reason for the Armed Forces commissioner; this was alluded to by the noble Baroness, Lady Newlove, and referred...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 cc362-4GC
House
House of Lords

We are trying to say that we certainly wish to see the investigative work of the commissioner funded. Therefore, “must” is appropriate in that particular instance, so we have included it there.

Should the commissioner feel that their funding was insufficient to carry out their functions effectively, they will have the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c364GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may start by welcoming everybody to the Committee, and I look forward to the consideration of the Bill. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, for the way in which she introduced the amendment, and in particular the points she made about the general approval that everyone has...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 cc329-330GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Smith. Although I do not agree with her on Amendment 2, let me just say that I think the fact that she spoke to both that amendment and Amendment 10 has provoked a very interesting and important debate. I will deal with...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c336GC
House
House of Lords

I know it will change in September, but engagement is covered. Trying to overly constrain this definition may risk suggesting that family is more of a traditional nuclear family, and it may not reflect

differing circumstances, such as the bereaved or non-traditional family set ups. We have tried to reflect...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c336GC
House
House of Lords

I am advised that Regulation 2(3)(a),

“a person whose relationship with A is akin to a relationship between spouses or civil partners”

includes engaged people. If that is wrong, I will come back to it, but that is the whole point of having the draft regulations before us. As I said, these...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c337GC
House
House of Lords

That is a really helpful comment from my noble friend. These are draft regulations; we are not going to legislate them now. The Bill will give us the power to create secondary legislation, and those draft regulations can be changed when people make various comments, including the ones my noble...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c337GC
House
House of Lords

One would expect the complexity of modern family life to be reflected in the regulations. In the end, one would hope that the commissioner would exercise some professionalism and care with

respect to that. I take the noble and gallant Lord’s point and my noble friend’s point, but it is...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 cc337-8GC
House
House of Lords

The noble and gallant Lord makes a good point. Let us reflect on that and see where we get to. But I could not agree more with him about the nervousness that you would expect from a recruit who has just joined and done the attestation and is part of...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c339GC
House
House of Lords

I agree with that. Let us be clear that the service complaints system remains in place; it is the Service Complaints Ombudsman’s responsibilities that are being transferred into the Armed Forces commissioner role. So I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lancaster, for allowing me to reiterate that point. He is...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 cc339-342GC
House
House of Lords

Let me correct something before we move on. I said that the Armed Forces Bill will come into force in early 2026. That is not correct; I misspoke, of course. The Armed Forces commissioner will be set up in early 2026. I apologise profusely for that error and hope that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c341GC
House
House of Lords

An individual can become commissioner if they have been a member of the Armed Forces, but not if they are a serving member.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c347GC
House
House of Lords

As that was a direct question, I put it on the record that I do not know the answer. We will find it out, and if I do not write before the end of Committee, I will make sure that I say something on Report in answer to that.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c351GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I again thank my noble friend Lord Beamish for bringing his experience and knowledge of many years. As he says, we have known each other for a long time, and I appreciate the contributions that he has made in the past and will make in the future—on not...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 cc352-4GC
House
House of Lords

It is absolutely correct that the Defence Committee can make a recommendation but the Secretary of State does not have to follow it. I suggest to the Committee that, if the Defence Committee of the House of Commons said that the person who had been recommended or offered the post...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c353GC
House
House of Lords

I think my noble friend knows the answer to his own question, which is: no, it is not in the Bill—that is what he wants me to say. From his own experience, he knows that the Secretary of State said in the other place, and read into the record, the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c353GC
House
House of Lords

Without saying whether that is a good or a bad idea, what I have said is that—although this is not actually in the Bill, as my noble friend said—clearly, our view is that going through the Defence Committee is the appropriate parliamentary involvement.

We have said that we can consider...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c353GC
House
House of Lords

All I can say in response to the concerns raised by the noble Lord is that we believe that the appropriate way for Parliament to be involved is through the Defence Select Committee. I have heard the points that noble Lords have made with respect to that. The appointment of...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c355GC
House
House of Lords

All I can say is that our belief, understanding and intention is for it to be an open and transparent process, subject to the scrutiny of the House of Commons Select Committee, which we would see as having a role. Of course, in the end, the Secretary of State ultimately...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c355GC
House
House of Lords