Skip to main content

1-20 of 199 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Torts

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Torts (199)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords consideration of Commons amendment. Lords amendment 10E not insisted on and Commons amendment 10F in lieu agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Baroness Thornton
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1869-1879
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Howe

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 c1870
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we return to consider the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill for what I hope will be the final time. I thank noble Lords once again for the insightful debates that we have had on this important Bill, which is designed to ensure that the higher education sector...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1870-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I seek some clarification of the new subsection (3)(b) proposed in Amendment 10F, which provides:

“A person may bring proceedings under subsection (1) only if … a decision has been made under that scheme as to the extent to which the complaint was justified”.

I seek clarification that an institution...

Member
Baroness Lawlor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 c1871
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his introduction of the government amendment in lieu and Amendment 10F.

When the Bill left this House with the amendments, led by the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Willetts, which was supported from these Benches, it was the Government’s own amendment at...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1871-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when this Bill left your Lordships’ House, it seemed that through the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Willetts, we had achieved a reasonable and workable compromise. Sensibly, the Government had accepted as axiomatic the principle that the person complaining that their freedom of speech had been...

Member
Lord Grabiner (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1872-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very glad to be here, to hopefully see the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill fly through at last and become law. I am also pleased to see that some attempt has been made to restore some teeth to this important legislation. It is true that...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1873-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a long process for a Bill that started two years ago. There have been five changes of Secretary of State for Education since then, more changes of junior Minister, and a certain sense that many of us have had that some of the Ministers guiding...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1875-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are now reaching the conclusion of what has been a long, time-consuming, complex process, and I think the process of revising and scrutinising this legislation has meant that we have ended up with a Bill that is better designed and stronger and more effective than when we...

Member
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1876-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords for their questions and comments, which I shall do my best to respond to. I begin with the noble Lord, Lord Wallace, who made, if I may say so, a very gracious speech—I know that he has severe doubts about the Bill....

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2023
Reference
829 cc1877-9
House
House of Lords

It is a red letter day for me, Madam Deputy Speaker, because I have just found out that you were listening to my speech.

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1246
House
House of Commons

On 21 June 2010, the BBC carried a report headlined ““Government shuns call to change strike laws””. The report said the Government had indicated that there were ““no plans”” for alterations in the law on industrial action. That might help my hon. Friend. It will be interesting to see whether...

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1248
House
House of Commons

I will indeed. I was just dealing with the intervention.

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1234
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a good, reasonable point. The law would not be clarified in any way by the Bill, but there is a real danger, as I have pointed out, that it would take us back to the situation we faced in the 1970s and 1980s. Much of the...

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1234
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. One of the things that I have learned in my short time in Parliament is that those on the Labour Benches tend to be very intolerant of anybody who holds a different opinion to them. I do not think that is particularly sensible in a...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1243-4
House
House of Commons

Picking up on that point, I would not want the House to think that I intended any personal disrespect to the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington, who has brought the Bill to the House with the noblest of intentions. My frustration, as a new Member, is that we might...

Member
Charlie Elphicke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1244
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his intervention. Anyone who knows him will know that he would never intend any discourtesy to anyone, and I had certainly taken that as read, but I am sure that the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington will be grateful to him...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1244-5
House
House of Commons

Let me explain why my hon. Friend's point is a good one. When asked to grant an interlocutory injunction, the courts will by definition have to act very quickly, as he says. They do not have the time to consider all the evidence in detail, so if there is a...

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1245
House
House of Commons

One oddity about injunctions is their application to Members of Parliament. They are very hard to enforce, given the freedom from civil arrest that we enjoy. Does my hon. Friend agree?

Member
Charlie Elphicke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1245
House
House of Commons

I am sure that my hon. Friend is right. He got rather technical during the course of that intervention, at which point it went beyond my capabilities. The bit that I understood, however, I certainly agreed with. Knowing my hon. Friend as I do, I am sure that I would...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2010
Reference
516 c1245
House
House of Commons