Skip to main content

1-20 of 6,017 results for subject:Protection

Subject X
Training

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (11) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (5) + Public bills (5)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (3)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (4)
-
Statutory instruments (4)
+ Members' contributions (5,581)
-
Maiden speeches (3)
-
Oral answers to questions (26)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
-
Oral questions (26)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (5,528)
+ Parliamentary committees (79) + Committee proceedings (49)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (14)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (20)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
-
Select Committee reports (16)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (10)
-
Select Committee written evidence (6)
+ Parliamentary papers (124)
-
Command papers (19)
-
Consultation papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (4)
-
Deposited papers (69)
-
House of Commons papers (30)
-
House of Lords papers (2)
-
Unprinted papers (4)
-
White papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (206) + Debates (134)
-
Adjournment debates (9)
-
Backbench debates (5)
+ Committee proceedings (49)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (14)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (20)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (93)
-
Debates on bills (90)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (3)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Questions for short debate (8)
+ Statements (68) + Oral statements (21)
-
Ministerial statements (21)
-
Written statements (47)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (117)
-
Oral questions (26)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (90)
+ Research briefings (7) + Commons Briefing papers (7)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Training (6,017)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage first day. Schedule 3 agreed to. Clauses 8 to 31 agreed to. Schedule 4 agreed to. Clauses 32 to 36 agreed to. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Answering member
Baroness Goldie
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc202-232
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Brinton

21: Schedule 3, page 98, line 40, at end insert—

“Part 1A

Service Stalking Protection Notices

1A In Part 3 of AFA 2006 (power of arrest, search and entry), after Chapter 1A (inserted by paragraph 1) insert—

“Chapter 1B

Service Stalking Protection Notices

74E Power to give a service stalking protection notice

(1) An authorised...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc203-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have all three amendments in this group. They aim to improve the arrangements for cases of service stalking. Amendment 21 wants to create a service stalking protection notice—SSPN—by mirroring the existing framework for the service domestic abuse protection notices, giving service police an equivalent power to provide...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc205-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I regret that I did not sign the amendments tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton. They have my full support. We have worked together for many years on the issue of stalking, together with the noble Lord who sits in the Chair. I believe that many of...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c207
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I simply endorse everything my noble friend Lady Brinton has said. I do not think there is anything I need to add.

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c207
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, has offered us a very thoughtful exposition of why further action is required to strengthen the service justice system, and the noble Baroness, Lady Royall, made an important contribution in support of that. I wholeheartedly concur with the rationale behind the amendments from...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc207-8
House
House of Lords

First, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for bringing forward these crucial and really important amendments, and my noble friend Lady Royall for what she said in support of them.

On the point about the whistleblower review raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie—I know the noble Baroness, Lady Smith,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc208-211
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister and the other speakers, in particular the noble Baroness, Lady Royall, with whom I have worked for many years on this; I am very grateful for her support. I am also grateful that the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, has shown some...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c211
House
House of Lords

Of course.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c211
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister. I am very grateful to him for that. On that basis, depending on the meeting, I may bring an amendment back on Report, but for now I withdraw Amendment 21.

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c211
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Brinton

24: After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause—

“Domestic abuse and summary hearings for assault and assault occasioning actual bodily harm

(1) A commanding officer may not hear summarily a charge of assault or occasioning actual bodily harm where the alleged conduct amounts to, or is alleged to amount...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c212
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have three amendments in this group and, while they are not related to stalking, the principles behind tabling them are not dissimilar. They specify more detail than I think the Minister is comfortable with, but each states very clearly where the boundaries are on a number of...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc212-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have been listening very carefully to the noble Baroness; it is obviously a matter of great importance. I have a question to which she might be able to give an answer when she winds up on this debate. Amendment 24 includes the phrase:

“or is alleged to amount...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c214
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to support, in particular, Amendments 24 and 25. That is not to say that we on these Benches are not giving our full support to my noble friend Lady Brinton for Amendment 26, but I think the point of Amendment 24, taking the chain of...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c214
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in a similar vein to the previous group, I think I am pretty well on a similar page to the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, particularly on Amendment 25, which seeks to ensure that the service victims’ code cannot be restricted to exclude victims of sexual offences or domestic...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc214-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for bringing forward these amendments, which are of significance to us all as we seek to improve the current situation. I also thank my noble friend Lord Stansgate for his contribution, and the noble Baronesses, Lady Smith and Lady Goldie....

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc215-7
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to all the speakers. To address the question asked by the noble Viscount, Lord Stansgate, I think he is looking at that clause the wrong way round. He asked about the definition of actual bodily harm, where the alleged conduct “amounts to” or “is alleged to...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c216
House
House of Lords

Moved by

The Lord Bishop of Norwich

27: Clause 16, page 36, line 22, leave out paragraph (b)

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, and others in the name of the Lord Bishop of Norwich, seek to remove the requirement that an offence must be a “serious offence” for a Provost Marshal to be the...

Member
Bishop of Norwich (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c218
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 27, I will speak also to Amendments 28 to 34 in my name; I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Smith of Newnham, for her support. I declare an interest, both for this series of amendments and for my contributions in Committee earlier today, as the...

Member
Bishop of Norwich (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc218-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to give my verbal support to the amendments in the name of the right reverend Prelate, which I have co-signed. I did so precisely because I think there are areas that need to be further explored. In particular, the points that he raised so eloquently need...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc219-220
House
House of Lords