Skip to main content

1-20 of 93 results for subject:Playgrounds

Subject X
Trees

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Trees (93)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage third day. Clause 2 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Khan of Burnley
Answering member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc379-439GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was not planning to speak on this group, but I want to respond to some of the points that have been made. I agree completely with what the noble Baroness said about antisemitism and the marches in London—I think she knows that. She, the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc386-7GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for giving way. As I understand it—and I am prepared to be corrected—neither of these amendments amend the plan. They just say that the plan must be stuck to, so all they are concerned about is what I describe as mission creep. Secondly,...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c387GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are having a civilised discussion about this matter, but it is quite clear how controversial it is. It is also quite clear that, once the building begins, and as it proceeds, the traffic is disrupted and the Victoria Tower Gardens become a building site, there will be...

Member
Lord Tugendhat (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c390GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to, in the nicest possible way, challenge the noble Lord, Lord Austin, again. I am not sure whether he was here when we had our discussion on how the project would be managed. He quotes the advice of historians. The historians are advisory only. They are...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc390-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, since we have absolutely no guarantee that there will be a proper planning application, we have to set those remarks to one side.

I just want to add that this is not about nimbyism or selfishness. For those of us who have a real, deep family interest in this...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc390-1GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Strathcarron

8: Clause 2, page 1, line 18, at end insert “, subject to the total area used for such activities not exceeding either 1429 square metres or the area shown in the plan in appendix 4 of the letter sent by the Promoter to the House of Commons...

Member
Lord Strathcarron (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c379GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 8 simply seeks to ensure that the area taken up by the Holocaust memorial and learning centre in Victoria Tower Gardens will not occupy an area any greater than is required, should it go ahead as currently proposed. One thousand four hundred and twenty-nine square metres...

Member
Lord Strathcarron (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc379-380GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 14 says that the proposed monument must not be extended or altered in any “replacement scheme”. On this occasion, I shall be relatively brief.

It was my experience as a constituency MP that developers would get planning permission for, say, 20 houses, and then a few months...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc380-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to say a word or two in support of the amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Blencathra, and the amendments on size. I will then move on to my Clause 2 stand part notice.

On size, the noble Lord, Lord Blencathra, has said pretty...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc382-4GC
House
House of Lords

They are advisory only.

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c385GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just say a few words in support of my noble friend Lord Strathcarron’s Amendments 8 and 17. Projects such as this are always liable to mission creep. This has already had quite a lot of mission creep attached to it, and I can see many reasons why...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c385GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief. I am pleased that the Government have allocated additional days to discuss the Bill, but I am slightly concerned that we are becoming repetitious and are in danger of spending more time on it than we are spending in Committee on reform of the...

Member
Lord Pickles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc385-6GC
House
House of Lords

People have argued against this proposal from day one. They have argued against not just the location but the idea of having a memorial and it being in Victoria Tower Gardens. I accept and understand that the tactics now are to

say, “Well, look, we are not against the memorial...

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc387-8GC
House
House of Lords

I cannot speak for my noble friends, but I deeply resent the suggestion that our suggestions for a proper memorial are somehow a tactic to delay and destroy the Bill. All of us on this side of the argument are deeply committed to a proper memorial, the memorial the Holocaust...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1438GC
House
House of Lords

Let me respond to that point; it is a valid question, and I want to answer it. Every single Member of this House and the other place had the opportunity to sit down with the historian responsible for the content. As far as I am aware, the only three people...

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1438GC
House
House of Lords

In his argumentum ad historian, is the noble Lord suggesting that the rest of us do not know our history of the Holocaust? If so, that is extremely insulting.

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c389GC
House
House of Lords

Of course I am not suggesting that; I would never do so.

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c389GC
House
House of Lords

That is what the noble Lord just suggested.

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c389GC
House
House of Lords

Hold on. Let me be really clear about this. Of course I am not suggesting that—not for one moment. What I said, very specifically—the noble Lord should concede this—was about the historian responsible for the content of the memorial. I was speaking about that specifically and not about anybody else’s...

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c389GC
House
House of Lords