Skip to main content

1-20 of 283 results for subject:Euthanasia

Subject X
War crimes

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
War crimes (283)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Croatia is expected to join the EU in July 2013. This Bill would allow the UK to ratify Croatia’s accession treaty and would also cover the Protocol to the Lisbon Treaty put forward by the Irish Government.

Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
1 November 2012
Reference
RP12-64

Coroners and Justice Bill. Lords report stage second day.

Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c981-1043; 713 c1059-94
House
House of Lords

66: After Clause 55, insert the following new Clause— "Exceptions to offence of assisting suicide Notwithstanding sections 53, 54 and 55, no offence shall have been committed if assistance is given to a person to commit suicide who is suffering from a confirmed, incurable and disabling illness which prevents them...

Member
Lord Alderdice (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1076
House
House of Lords

66A: Before Clause 64, insert the following new Clause— "Genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes (1) The International Criminal Court Act 2001 is amended as follows. (2) In sections 53 and 60 (trial and punishment of main offences), after subsection (6) add— "(7) Subsections (5) and (6) are subject...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1089-94
House
House of Lords

My Lords, looking at the amendment, I am struck by its dismal wording. It states, ""if assistance is given to a person to commit suicide who is suffering from a confirmed, incurable and disabling illness which prevents them from carrying through their own wish to bring their life to a...

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1083-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 57, 58 and 59 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral, deal with the important question of developmental immaturity in the context of the diminished responsibility partial defence to murder. We remain unpersuaded of the need for the amendments, and I will do...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1033-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have my name attached to the amendments, and I strongly support them. It is hard to follow the eloquent and pithy contribution from my noble friend, with all her experience in psychiatric matters. As vice-chair of the All-Party Group for Children and Young People in Care and...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1031-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we all feel horror at gangland killings by young people, but one has to put them to one side when discussing this amendment; one also has to remember that children of 10 are convicted of murder. Perhaps some children of that age should be convicted of...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1032-3
House
House of Lords

I am afraid I do not. I have a great deal of sympathy with the argument that is being adduced, but in my view the law has to be precise. The term "developmental immaturity" has no precedent, is not precise and ought to be rejected. The arguments that have been...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1033
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my name is attached to this amendment. I remind your Lordships of what I said on the previous amendment: nothing could be more imprecise than the words that are used in the proposed Clause 48 on provocation, or indeed more imprecise than the concept of provocation in the...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1033
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think the noble Earl has misunderstood.

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1030
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have misunderstood; I apologise and withdraw what I said.

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1030
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Earl: it is quite difficult to get one’s head around exactly what this amendment seeks to do. I suppose I am trying to emphasise that there should still be a high bar to overcome before the defence could be successfully deployed. Even if...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1031
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this amendment. The problem is to do with so-called normal children. The noble Lord has already talked about the partial defence that is available to the mentally handicapped adult who is intellectually functioning, or who may have a developmental delay in other emotional areas as a...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1031
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg the noble Lord’s pardon, but are the Government themselves not introducing in this clause the defence of developmental immaturity?

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1030
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord. I think that he will find that it is the jury that finds for diminished responsibility as well. The judge recommends, but it is for the jury to find. It is a different verdict.

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1021
House
House of Lords

I am sorry also to interrupt the noble Lord to make a brief point. Does he accept that, in the case of the defence of provocation, which is plainly an extenuating circumstance, it is the jury that now takes the decision as to whether there has been sufficient justification? The...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1021
House
House of Lords

Yes, I accept what the noble Lord says and, so far as the noble Baroness is concerned, we are about to come to a series of extended debates on developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, gross provocation, sexual infidelity, proximity of qualifying triggers et cetera. These are issues that we are going...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1021-2
House
House of Lords

Do I understand that the noble Lord is arguing that what I propose is fine? Would he support the proposal put forward by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd of Berwick?

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1022
House
House of Lords

All I am saying at this stage is that the noble Lord is right to point out the difficulty of understanding what "reasonable" means in these circumstances. How would the conflict that the noble Lord and I have identified be resolved? Would we see inconsistencies in verdicts emerge in different...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2009
Reference
713 c1022
House
House of Lords