Skip to main content

1-20 of 497 results for subject:Separation

Subject X
Contact orders

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Contact orders (497)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Member
Charlie Elphicke (Conservative)
Type
Ten minute rule bills
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
Bill 174 2010-12
House
House of Commons

I rise to oppose the Bill and declare that I practised in family law as both a solicitor and a barrister for about 35 years. I therefore draw on a number of years' experience in the courts. I believe that the motion has been made with the best possible intentions,...

Member
Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c186-8
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That leave be given to bring in a Bill to require courts, local authorities and other bodies, when determining or enforcing issues of residence and contact, to operate under the presumption that the rights of a child include the right to grow up knowing and having access...

Member
Charlie Elphicke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c184-6
House
House of Commons

Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 174). To be read a second time on 13 May.

Lead member
Charlie Elphicke
Type
Debates on bills
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c184-8
House
House of Commons

I have two points. The noble Lord presses me, but it genuinely is for the commission to develop the business model. That is why we are going down this route. If it planned to do something that the Government thought was outrageous, the protections are in the directions and guidance...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c425GC
House
House of Lords

I find this discussion quite extraordinary. In what he has just said, the Minister relied on Clause 7(4)(a). My noble friend and I understand quite readily what, "““any Minister of the Crown or department of the Government of the United Kingdom””" means, but we do not know what ““other public...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c424GC
House
House of Lords

The debate has been valuable. I want to reflect on what has been said. I have two queries. First, the commission will have such a difficult birth and early period before it gets into a stable state, if it ever does. I am prepared to believe that the work done...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c425GC
House
House of Lords

I am extremely grateful to the noble Lord for proving what I said in my opening sentences on Tuesday—I do not have Tuesday’s Hansard with me—about the Minister’s way of operating. I am extremely pleased that he will take this away and will hopefully bring back an amendment that is...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c436GC
House
House of Lords

This may be a convenient moment for the Committee to adjourn until Tuesday at 3.30 pm.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c436GC
House
House of Lords

The annual report is an important document. The amendments in this group tabled in my name and that of my noble friend require that nothing in any future annual report will interfere with the flow of the quarterly statistics, which are currently published through the Office for National Statistics. I...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c432-3GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 58: 58: Clause 9, page 4, line 22, leave out ““for each financial year”” and insert ““at the end of the first complete year and thereof annually”” The noble Lord said: The amendments are intended to improve the provisions in the Bill that relate to the commission's...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c431-2GC
House
House of Lords

I find this a rather curious amendment from Gingerbread. I am not sure that it is appropriate to put words such as this in a Bill such as this. We all know why child maintenance is important; it is to ensure that a child who lives with one parent has...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c397GC
House
House of Lords

I am sure that everyone, not only in the Moses Room but throughout the country, wants to support the reduction of poverty among children—children with both parents and those who are separated from one parent. On this occasion, I support the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, and the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c399GC
House
House of Lords

My understanding—perhaps I misunderstood—was that under the EDS contract, it owned not only the system but the information on it, so that had one sought to transfer contracts, none of the data would have gone with it, so one would have had to have started from scratch. Obviously, that was...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c394GC
House
House of Lords

On that happy note, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 30 not moved.]

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c396GC
House
House of Lords

Obviously, I will withdraw the amendments. I will study carefully what the Minister has said. I think that Parliament needs more reassurance than he is prepared to give us collectively. There are issues with commercial confidentiality and so forth. If the Office of Government Commerce is involved, is there not...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c396GC
House
House of Lords

That is an extremely useful adjunct to what I was saying. As usual, the noble Baroness, being rather more fluent than I normally am, has put flesh on the bones of my argument. I do not think that we will get further with this proposal today. All sorts of inhibitions...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c389GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, referred to the Minister being lonely. My spies tell me that he has been moved from having responsibility for this subject and actually has nothing to do with this amendment. That is annoying. His 15 months are obviously up; he is just beginning to get...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c385-6GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 26: 26: Clause 2, page 1, line 15, after ““to”” insert ““encourage when appropriate and to”” The noble Lord said: Here we are again. It is somewhat distressing to find the Minister on his own. He has an enormous set of advisers behind him, but he is...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c379-80GC
House
House of Lords

I do not have the letter in front of me, but it is not my understanding that Ventura will run the contact centre. We are looking to see initially how staff internally can be involved in providing that face-to-face service. Certainly at the starting point, we know that the voluntary...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
698 c418GC
House
House of Lords