Skip to main content

1-20 of 64 results for subject:"River Thames"

Subject X
Water treatment

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Water treatment (64)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the efficacy of an indirect potable reuse scheme which would take treated sewage from Mogden Sewage Treatment Works, process it using an advanced water recycling plant using reverse osmosis to remove PFAS,...

Asked by
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
16968
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they assess that Thames Water is making the necessary investments in sewage treatment facilities to clean up the River Thames.

Asked by
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 October 2024
Reference
HL1445
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,

That this House has considered water resources plan proposals for Teddington.

It is a pleasure, Sir Christopher, to serve under your chairmanship and to lead this important debate on Thames Water’s hugely controversial plans for a water recycling scheme at Teddington in my constituency.

I am very glad to...

Member
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c181WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member, who is my constituency neighbour, for securing this debate. Does she agree that instead of yet another hugely expensive capital scheme—we still have Tideway, as well—it might be better if Thames Water focused on significantly reducing the leakage of fresh water from its pipes?

Member
Ruth Cadbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c181WH
House
House of Commons

I could not agree more with the hon. Lady, my constituency neighbour, and I will make that very point in my speech.

However, I will just briefly set out what the proposal is. It is to abstract millions of litres of fresh water from the Thames in my constituency and transfer...

Member
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 cc181-2WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend and constituency neighbour for securing this extremely important debate. She mentioned Ham Lands, which is in my constituency of Richmond Park. It is a local nature reserve that the local community has spent decades trying to protect. It has a unique ecology; it is home...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c182WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend and constituency neighbour for that important intervention; I could not agree with her more. Thames Water has conducted a consultation, but its response to its own consultation, published just a few days ago, makes it abundantly clear that it has not listened to public opinion...

Member
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c182WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on not only securing this debate but how she has conducted her campaign on behalf of her constituents, working with our hon. Friend the Member for Richmond Park (Sarah Olney).

Many of my constituents in Kingston are worried about the scheme. They treasure ecology and water...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c182WH
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend demonstrates, once again, the strength of opinion locally. Not only has Thames Water not listened to residents’ representations but its interaction and communication since the start of the process have been, frankly, woeful.

Just days ago, Thames Water published its revised water resources management plan—supposedly, as I...

Member
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 cc182-6WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure, Sir Christopher, to have you in the Chair.

I thank the hon. Member for Twickenham (Munira Wilson) for securing the debate and giving us the opportunity to discuss the subject and the whole issue of water supply that faces the country. I put on record an apology...

Member
Rebecca Pow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 cc186-8WH
House
House of Commons

I have a final point. Although it is meant to be a drought measure, for technical reasons, to keep the system working, what is known as a sweetener flow would have to be operational every single day, so we are talking about millions of litres of treated effluent going into...

Member
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c188WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for that. This is long term and strategic—that is what we have to talk about now in terms of water supply. I am concerned that it keeps being described as treated effluent. She will know that, once water has gone through a treatment plant and...

Member
Rebecca Pow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 cc188-9WH
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered water resources plan proposals for Teddington. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Munira Wilson
Answering member
Rebecca Pow
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 cc179-189WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the implication for his polices of Thames Water’s proposal to convey millions of litres of treated wastewater into the River Thames at Teddington Weir, including (a) potential health implications, (b) impact...

Asked by
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2023
Reference
122505
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 07/09/2017 from Lord Prior of Brampton to Baroness Young of Old Scone regarding the Thames Tideway Tunnel project, correcting information given during a debate on deregulation: public services and health and safety. 1p.

Deposited by
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Deposited papers
Date
7 September 2017
Reference
DEP2017-0539
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to have the opportunity to debate this important project. It is not the most popular time in the House of Lords weekly calendar, but it is still good to have the opportunity. We have had a number of Questions in short debates over the months...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2013
Reference
748 cc476-481GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, who has been one of the parliamentary leaders against this particular tideway scheme, and indeed the sole leader of the campaign in the House of Lords. He needs to be thanked for his efforts, so I have come along, not as...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2013
Reference
748 cc481-2GC
House
House of Lords

I am so glad that my noble friend Lord Berkeley has secured this debate today on the proposals for the Thames tideway tunnel. Coming as it does after our previous debate, it allows our discussion to transcend from the sublime to the slime. I pay tribute to my noble friend’s...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2013
Reference
748 cc482-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a most interesting and informative debate, with a good exchange of views on many aspects of the Thames tunnel project. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, for his assiduousness in pressing the Government on this subject. I will try to address as many of...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2013
Reference
748 cc484-8GC
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister explain what these exceptional risks are?

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2013
Reference
748 c488GC
House
House of Lords