Skip to main content

1-20 of 265 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Young offenders

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Young offenders (265)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether the Government has considered establishing periodic review procedures for High Court injunctions granting lifelong anonymity to offenders convicted of serious crimes committed as juveniles.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
118304
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 19/12/2018 from Baroness Manzoor to Lord Paddick regarding issues raised during the debate on the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (Amendment) Order 2018: the effectiveness of civil injunctions. 2p.

Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 December 2018
Reference
DEP2018-1289
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Shailesh Vara
Answering member
Andy Slaughter
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
8 December 2014
House
House of Commons

My Lords, the order before the Committee today amends Schedule 1 to the LASPO Act 2012 to maintain the status quo regarding the provision of legal aid for proceedings involving gang injunctions in respect of under-18s and to reflect the expansion of advocacy in special educational needs matters. It also...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2014
Reference
757 cc398-400GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for moving and explaining the order. It is always rather worrying when one reads in a background note that, as became apparent in the words the Minister used today, an order that had gone through Parliament was defective. It is hard to know whether...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2014
Reference
757 c400GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her comments on this. Clearly, I do not accept all that she says about the LASPO Act, which, in the Government’s view, was a necessary correction to

reflect the amount of money that was being spent on legal aid. Some difficult choices...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2014
Reference
757 cc400-1GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Faulks
Answering member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
1 December 2014
Reference
757 cc397-401GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Meacher

32: Before Clause 47, insert the following new Clause—

“Dissuasion Panels to prevent gang-related violence and drug-dealing activity

(1) A police officer may refer a person aged 14 or over to a Dissuasion Panel under this section if the following two conditions are met.

(2) The first condition is that the...

Member
Baroness Meacher (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2014
Reference
755 cc157-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Committee approves Clause 47, I suggest that we think very carefully about its construction and its drafting. Broadening out our consideration from the specific issues of drugs on which we were focused while examining the last group of amendments, we should look at some wider issues...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2014
Reference
755 cc169-172
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Section 47 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009—PACA, as my noble friend referred to it a few minutes ago—provides that the Secretary of State must issue guidance relating to gang-related violence injunctions. Under Section 47, the Secretary of State must, before issuing or revising guidance, consult the...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2014
Reference
755 c186
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider agreed to on question.

Lead member
Shailesh Vara
Answering member
Andy Slaughter
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Third Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
7 July 2014
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Faulks
Answering member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 July 2014
Reference
755 cc1-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the order before us today amends Schedule 1 to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act to allow for advocacy in a youth court to be funded by civil legal aid for under-18s in respect of injunctions to prevent gang-related violence. The purpose of this draft...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2014
Reference
755 cc1-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, has outlined, Schedule 1 to the LASPO Act sets out the scope of the civil legal aid scheme. It is well documented that the Labour Party, along with many other organisations, opposed what the Government did in respect of civil legal aid...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2014
Reference
755 c2GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for his comments. Although it is perfectly true that the party opposite has been opposed to legal aid changes, it does not oppose this order because it does not change the eligibility of legal aid but is concerned only with the venue of...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2014
Reference
755 cc2-3GC
House
House of Lords
Type
Public acts
Date
13 March 2014
Reference
CHAP 12 2014; 2014 c. 12

My Lords, in Committee, my noble friend Lady Hamwee questioned whether it was appropriate for under-18s to be excluded from their own homes on the grounds of anti-social behaviour. After further consideration, I am content to make a change that ensures that only adults can be excluded from their home...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 c1562
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak also to the other amendments in my name in this group. Amendments 12 and 13 to Schedule 2, and Amendments 34 and 35 to Clause 37, seek to remove imprisonment as a sanction for children breaching their IPNAs or failing to comply with police dispersal...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 cc1553-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to Amendment 21G. The first of these amendments takes us to Clause 12, which is the clause giving power to exclude a person from his home in the case of violence or the risk of harm. This power can be included in an IPNA—in...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
749 cc971-2
House
House of Lords

We acknowledge that there was broad support for the requirement that the youth offending team be consulted before an injunction under Clause 1 is sought against somebody under 18. However, there appears to be no timescale for the consultation with youth offending teams, and as a result there could be—not...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
749 cc978-9
House
House of Lords