Skip to main content

1-100 of 4,041 results for subject:"Data processing"

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (17) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (6)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (7)
-
Statutory instruments (7)
+ Members' contributions (3,512)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (4)
+ Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,503)
+ Parliamentary committees (102) + Committee proceedings (66)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (37)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (8)
-
Select Committee reports (11)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (8)
-
Select Committee written evidence (19)
+ Parliamentary papers (168)
-
Annual reports (2)
-
Command papers (11)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (107)
-
House of Commons papers (30)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
-
Impact assessments (8)
-
Treaties (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (9)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (127) + Debates (117)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (66)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (37)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (8)
-
Debates on select committee reports (3)
+ Legislative debates (104)
-
Debates on bills (91)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (13)
+ Statements (10)
-
Written statements (10)
+ Parliamentary questions (205) + Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Written questions (200)
+ Research briefings (15) + Commons Briefing papers (8)
-
Briefing papers on bills (6)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTnotes (3)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 47 of his department's Strategic Defence Review, published 2 June 2025, whether the Chief Information Officer has adequate authority to establish and supervise common technical standards, including those related to cyber security and data management.

Asked by
Stuart Anderson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
21519
House
House of Commons

I. Digital verification services. 2026 annual report on the operation of Part 2 of Data (Use and Access) Act 2025. 28p. II. Letter dates 14/07/2026 from Ian Murray MP to Chi Onwurah MP and Baroness Keeley regarding publication of the annual report. 1p.

Deposited by
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Annual reports; Deposited papers
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0479
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Peter Kyle
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Consultation papers; Command papers
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
CP 1608
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Amendment 70 to clause 47 negatived on division (6 to 7). Amendment 48 to clause 47 negatived on division (6 to 7). Amendment 49 to clause 47 negatived on division (6 to 7). Clause 47, discussed with new clauses 7 and 8, agreed to. Clauses 48 to 50 agreed to....

Lead member
Karin Smyth
Answering member
Caroline Johnson
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Health Bill Committee
Date
2 July 2026
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Member share my concern that because of the speed at which big tech moves, we in this House as legislators always seem to be five steps behind where the technology is? How are we going to be able to regulate for a world that is faster...

Member
Rosie Wrighting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c114WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady raises a very interesting point. That is a challenge for all Governments and all Ministers, however able they are. We have a very good tech Minister here today, but it is a real challenge. The starting point is better co-operation, transparency and openness from big tech itself,...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c114WH
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c114WH
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Sir Jeremy. I congratulate the right hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) on securing this debate. Given the number of people present, it will be a successful debate, and it is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Sir Jeremy.

Technology plays a huge role in...

Member
Navendu Mishra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c115WH
House
House of Commons

On cyber-security, in recent weeks the US Government have decided to block Claude’s new AI software, Fable 5. What are my hon. Friend’s thoughts on new AI software and cyber-security?

Member
Rosie Wrighting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c115WH
House
House of Commons

I have a lot to say about the Trump Administration, but I will not bore the House with those remarks. The threats we are seeing to modern society from artificial intelligence are quite serious and there is an unpredictable Government in Washington DC.

The Government should do a big piece of...

Member
Navendu Mishra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc115-6WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) for securing the debate. It goes without saying that big tech companies, like everyone else, should pay their fair share. They should not be allowed to harvest a child’s data or feature harmful content on their platforms. That is...

Member
Adam Dance (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc116-7WH
House
House of Commons

In my constituency, scammers have managed to impersonate the council to demand bogus penalty charges from vulnerable residents. Meanwhile, the world’s leading deepfake expert, Hany Farid, says in The New York Times that he can no longer trust his own eyes. If he cannot, what chance do the rest of...

Member
John Milne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c117WH
House
House of Commons

I totally agree with my hon. Friend. Will the Minister set out the steps that the Government are taking with big tech and the Financial Conduct Authority to crack down on fraudsters? It is important that the Minister clearly sets out what new protections and awareness campaigns the Government are...

Member
Adam Dance (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c117WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) for bringing forward this important debate. It comes at a pertinent time, as we discuss the impact of social media on our children, the way we use AI, and the influence of big tech companies, including on our lives.

As...

Member
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c117WH
House
House of Commons

It is unusual for me to intervene, but I am glad the hon. Lady mentioned that number. I had no idea it was that many contracts for that particular company, and that underscores some of the points I was making. I can think of certain service companies, which I will...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c118WH
House
House of Commons

That is why I was so pleased the right hon. Member called the debate. I hope he agrees that once a contractor has failed for one Department, it should not be given a contract for another Department. I hope the Minister will speak to that.

I hugely support my constituents’ call...

Member
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c118WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy. In my lifetime, technology has found its way into every corner of society. It has changed our workplaces, our classrooms and my farm, to be honest. It has brought real benefits, but also huge harms.

One positive, of course, is...

Member
Ann Davies (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c119WH
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Sir Jeremy. I thank the right hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) for bringing this debate to Westminster Hall.

Apatura has submitted a planning application to Falkirk council for a 300-MW AI data centre just 500 metres from Forth Valley Royal...

Member
Brian Leishman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc119-120WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy. I thank the right hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) for securing the debate and for his thoughtful contribution. He not only highlighted the dangers of content and addiction but made a power analysis when he talked about...

Member
Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc120-1WH
House
House of Commons

I did not have time to raise this issue in my speech. The National Security and Investment Act 2021 established the National Security Investment Unit, which was the right move. If a particularly sensitive company with strategic assets or a technology that affects UK interests is to be sold or...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c121WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes an excellent point. That is another item on the list of things that we have ignored for far too long. Ultimately, we need to shift the balance of power. As he said in his speech, the power has been shifted too far in favour of...

Member
Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c121WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy.

We live in an age in which a handful of technology companies shape how we communicate, shop, work and receive news, and increasingly how the Government deliver public services. There is no question but that technology has brought enormous benefits...

Member
Steve Yemm (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc121-2WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Sir Jeremy. I congratulate the right hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) on securing this timely debate and on his interesting and balanced speech.

In today’s digital age, a small group of technology giants wield extraordinary influence over the...

Member
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc122-3WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy. I thank the right hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) for securing this important debate and for raising the very real issues of the impact of big tech on democracy.

Big tech has in many cases become synonymous with...

Member
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc123-5WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. Internal conflicts and leadership challenges cannot be allowed to cost Britain its technological future or the safety of our children. The Liberal Democrats will continue to push the Government on the positive role that British big tech can have, while holding the Government to account. Getting that right is...

Member
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c125WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy, and a privilege to respond to this debate on behalf of His Majesty’s Opposition. I also congratulate my right hon. Friend the Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) on securing this important debate. I know that we share a...

Member
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc125-7WH
House
House of Commons

It is always a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Sir Jeremy, but it is a particular pleasure when we are discussing questions of digital markets and regulation, because I know that you bring expertise in and experience of these issues.

I thank the right hon. Member for The...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc127-130WH
House
House of Commons

I am conscious of time, so I want to give the Minister the opportunity to answer the questions I asked: who owns the data, who controls the data, and what does that mean for democracy and the balance of power?

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c130WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman raises an important point, and I am personally interested in how we rest more agency and control in the hands of the British public and the British state when it comes to data. There are clear rules and regulations about both privacy and individual data consents...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c130WH
House
House of Commons

Just a minute: no deviation, repetition or hesitation—never from the Minister, who was completely direct, cogent and excellent as ever. But the question remains for all of us: who owns and controls the data and what does that mean for democracy? That is not a party political point. Is that...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c130WH
House
House of Commons

Motion, That this House has considered the role of Big Tech in society. Motion lapsed. Sitting adjourned without Question put.

Lead member
Mark Pritchard
Answering member
Kanishka Narayan
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc111-130WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the role of Big Tech in society.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy. It is good to see the Minister in his place, and indeed the shadow Minister, my hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c111WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the right hon. Gentleman on securing this very important debate. He is making an interesting speech. When we talk about big tech, we are primarily talking about companies based outside the UK—particularly in the United States. Does he agree that this argument is really about sovereignty and about...

Member
Gordon McKee (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c112WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an excellent point, and will touch on sovereignty later. The European Union—it is a positive in many ways—is looking at that. That is partly why I am making this speech today; it is about sovereignty too.

Who knows the most—who owns or hosts the most data—and how...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c112WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the right hon. Gentleman on securing this very important debate. Many big tech companies are a cause of concern, but a particular one is Palantir, which holds Government contracts worth more than £900 million, spanning 10 Departments. Does he agree that more concerning than its dominance is the...

Member
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c112WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes an important point. I will not name individual companies today—she has clearly put her views on the record—but no monopoly, be it a public or private sector monopoly, is good for our constituents, consumers and small and medium-sized businesses. She makes her case well.

Will this universal...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c112WH
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Caroline Voaden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c112WH
House
House of Commons

Let me make a bit of progress, and then I will try to come back to the hon. Lady. I have applied for this debate a few times—I have been lucky today, but we have only an hour, rather than 90 minutes.

Is big tech politically neutral? Sometimes it does not...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc112-3WH
House
House of Commons

Ten years ago today, the Brexit campaign became one of the first very successful disinformation campaigns. Ranging from Turkish immigrants to Spanish bullfighting, the targeted Facebook ads played on people’s fears and deceived millions. But today, disinformation is more pervasive, insidious and vindictive than ever before, so does the right...

Member
Caroline Voaden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c113WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Lady for raising that point. As I said, I am not going to reference particular tech companies or particular information or misinformation campaigns. I am trying to get Members across the House to raise their eyes a little and look at the big picture...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc113-4WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether the Section 254 direction under the Health and Social Care Act 2012 will be published and laid before Parliament for full scrutiny.

Asked by
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2026
Reference
7967
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Ian Murray
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Consultation papers; Command papers
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
CP 1592
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
8 June 2026
House
House of Commons

This briefing provides an overview of data centres, including their economic impact, energy consumption, and water consumption. It describes UK Government policy in these areas, as well as cyber resilience and planning policy.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
27 May 2026
Reference
CBP-10315
Laid by
Josh MacAlister
Department
Department for Education
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
30 April 2026
Reference
SI 2026/470
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
HC 1780 2024-26
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Matthew Pennycook
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
SI 2026/420
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
14 April 2026
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
HC 888 2024-26
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Peter Kyle
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Command papers
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
CP 1551
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Q5

.

Martin Wrigley (Newton Abbot) (LD):

Yesterday, the Chancellor announced £2 billion of funding for UK sovereign artificial intelligence and quantum capabilities. The Science, Innovation and Technology Committee was told that Government procurement will adapt to encourage UK companies to develop sovereign AI systems for Government use. In the light of those positive events, will the Prime Minister ensure that key digital systems in health, defence and policing are made sovereign and retendered to UK companies, not to politically motivated US companies such as Palantir?

Asked by
Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
782 c856
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Gentleman says, the Chancellor set out yesterday the huge economic opportunities of innovation and AI. We have put £5 billion behind British start-ups, and we will launch our sovereign AI unit with £500 million to help AI businesses start and grow. We are investing the £2 billion that he refers to in our quantum capabilities so that we can be the first country in the world to roll-out quantum computers at scale. Procurement must be the launchpad for start-ups, and we are determined to deliver that.

Answered by
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
782 c856
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Darren Jones
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Consultation papers (Government responses); Command papers
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
CP 1529
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Motion that this House has considered technology sovereignty. Motion lapsed and sitting adjourned without Question put (Standing Order No. 10(14)).

Lead member
Chi Onwurah
Answering member
Kanishka Narayan
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc88-96WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered technology sovereignty.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. We are four years into the Ukraine war and 10 days into the latest Iran-Israel-US conflict. At the start of this year, the US seized the President of Venezuela. A...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c88WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has advanced a very powerful vision of the global events affecting the country right now. When I talk to defence tech companies, I see that they reach the point of scaling up, but they are unable to access finance. Does my hon. Friend agree that this Government...

Member
Will Stone (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c89WH
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with my hon. Friend. He is absolutely right, and that support should take the form of access to investment, but also procurement and procurement decisions, which I will discuss in more detail.

The Digital Minister also told the Committee:

“There is no single internationally recognised definition of digital...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c89WH
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c89WH
House
House of Commons

I cannot help but give way to the hon. Member.

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c76WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is terribly kind and it is always a pleasure to come to a debate that she has secured. Recent studies indicate that AI-powered tools have already been used in phishing, ransomware, and social engineering attacks, making breaches faster, more targeted and harder to detect. The National Cyber...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c76WH
House
House of Commons

I certainly agree that we need to be able to defend ourselves against AI attacks.

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c76WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady and Chair of my Select Committee for giving way. Does she agree that a definition of sovereign tech is something that a foreign power could not switch off, so that the systems on which we rely could not be pulled out from under our feet,...

Member
Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c77WH
House
House of Commons

My fellow member of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee makes a very important point about the definition of sovereignty. I do not want to get too bogged down in the actual definition, but I agree that control matters, and I will say a little more about that.

I will raise...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc77-90WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady mentions Britain’s extraordinary human capital. In my role as my party’s Europe spokesperson, of late I have been speaking to very large international defence firms, which thrive in the UK intellectual environment. They have great links with universities, but they say to me that they are increasingly...

Member
Al Pinkerton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c90WH
House
House of Commons

The level of interest shows just what an important issue this is. I will come on to discuss some aspects of collaboration as it relates to sovereignty, but I observe that the last time our sovereignty as a mid-sized power was seriously debated was during Brexit, and the slogan “Take...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc90-1WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making an important point. When it comes to AI, an enormous amount of investment is needed. There are many discussions at the moment about the impact of that huge investment in AI. It is very difficult for a smaller country such as the UK to compete...

Member
Anneliese Dodds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c91WH
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend that we certainly need to work with like-minded countries.

The third area is cyber-security and data governance. Some argue that we are already at war in the cyber-sphere. Last year’s strategic defence review emphasised cyber and electromagnetic domains, and established a new UK cyber...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc91-3WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making an important speech on an important topic. She is right to talk about how the US and China dominate on technological sovereignty, and part of the reason it is very difficult for the UK to compete with them is, of course, the scale of those...

Member
Gordon McKee (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c80WH
House
House of Commons

It is an important question. I am not in a position to choose our allies, but I agree in principle that we should be working with the European Union. I do not think it should be a choice between the European Union and the US, though they may make that...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c80WH
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c81WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Ms Vaz. I congratulate the Chair of the Select Committee, my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West (Dame Chi Onwurah).

I have three quick anecdotal points and then a question for the Minister. Data sovereignty...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc82-94WH
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Ms Vaz. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West (Dame Chi Onwurah) on securing the debate.

Ensuring that we have a strong and secure technological landscape in the UK is vital not only to our...

Member
Allison Gardner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc94-5WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West (Dame Chi Onwurah) for securing this timely and vital debate.

In a world that is increasingly reliant on secure and stable access to digital technology, whether...

Member
Bayo Alaba (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc95-84WH
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Ms Vaz. I am grateful to be able to contribute to this important debate on tech sovereignty in the UK. There is something rather poignant about having this debate on the very day the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister has...

Member
Samantha Niblett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc96-85WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. I want to speak about technological sovereignty from an east midlands perspective. Too often, Westminster debates are focused on venture capital or high-level digital strategy and so forth while the real foundations of our tech capability lie in specific...

Member
Steve Yemm (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc85-97WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my kind colleagues. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Ms Vaz. This is such a big debate. It is because we are all passionate about UK AI and the growth of the sector in the UK that it is so important, because the growing monopolies...

Member
Emily Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc97-8WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to take part in a debate with you in the Chair, Ms Vaz. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West (Dame Chi Onwurah) for securing this debate. In my best Geordie, I will say that she’s done a geet...

Member
Dave Robertson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c98WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Ms Vaz. I massively thank the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West (Dame Chi Onwurah), the Chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, not only for securing this debate on one of the biggest issues of our...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc89-100WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. I warmly congratulate the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West (Dame Chi Onwurah) on securing such an important debate. It is so well attended, and it is a shame that it is not longer; I commend...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc100-2WH
House
House of Commons

It is such a pleasure to serve under you in the Chair, Ms Vaz. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West (Dame Chi Onwurah), the Chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, for securing this debate and bringing to it her deep...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc102-3WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for setting out his sovereignty stack. Just as an example, is an LLM a critical input or another level in the stack—and does it need to be British?

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c103WH
House
House of Commons

I valued my hon. Friend’s earlier point that sovereignty has to be seen in the round. We cannot make everything here; we have to look at the entire bundle that we have to offer. In the context of LLMs, there is some uncertainty as to whether all the capability will...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc91-104WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister knows that the Computer Misuse Act 1990 criminalises a lot of legitimate cyber-resilience and vulnerability research. I think that the Government are minded to introduce a statutory defence for such research, but can he share whether that defence will be introduced as part of the cyber Bill?

Member
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c105WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member is absolutely right to raise that point about a defence for cyber-security purposes. The Computer Misuse Act is being reviewed at the moment—the Home Office is looking at it—but, as I mentioned in Committee on the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill, that is...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc105-6WH
House
House of Commons

In one sentence, will the Minister say something about another geographical issue: collaboration with like-minded countries, especially in the EU?

Member
Anneliese Dodds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c106WH
House
House of Commons

I will simply give a note of total affirmation on the importance of that. Having met a series of Ministers from Europe, I know that we have a huge amount in common and a huge amount to do in the future.

I am being tested pretty intensively on time, so I...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc94-5WH
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 29/01/2026 from Baroness Levitt to Lord Gove regarding addressing delays in rape and serious sexual offence cases: responding to questions raised following a statement on restriction of jury trials: work between police forces and the Crown Prosecution Service to bring cases to court more quickly, and publication of...

Deposited by
Ministry of Justice
Type
Deposited papers
Date
29 January 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0063
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 11/12/2025 from Lord Katz to Baroness Doocey regarding the Crime and Policing Bill committee stage debate (fourth day): update on the Government's progress in responding to the recommendations set by the Independent Office for Police Conduct regarding the strip searching of children by police. 2p.

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0818
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 10/12/2025 from Baroness Lloyd of Effra to Lord Howell of Guidlford regarding a question on errors, delays and de-accreditation of official statistics, raised during a question on data adequacy status: EU data protection standards. 1p.

Deposited by
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Deposited papers
Date
10 December 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0845
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 19 September 2024 (HL968), why the Privacy Enhancing Technology data protection impact assessment has not been published, and when they plan to publish it.

Asked by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2025
Reference
HL11860
House
House of Lords

I. Government response to the Independent Review of Carer’s Allowance Overpayments. Incl. Annex. 37p. II. Independent Review of Carer’s Allowance Overpayments. 146p

Deposited by
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Deposited papers
Date
25 November 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0771
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that companies implementing (a) age-verification and (b) safety requirements use (i) secure and (ii) adequately regulated third-party vendors for data processing.

Asked by
Scott Arthur (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2025
Reference
86934
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what subset of border movements are affected by the Data Futures Project.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 2025
Reference
79666
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, which legacy systems will be (a) decommissioned and (b) replaced following the completion of the Data Futures Project.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 2025
Reference
79665
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department has taken recent steps to expand the Data Futures Project.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 2025
Reference
79664
House
House of Commons

I. Infected Blood Compensation Authority independent review. Incl. Annex. 21p. II. Letter dated 30/10/2025 from Nick Thomas-Symonds MP to the Deposited Papers Clerk regarding the above document for deposit in the House libraries. 1p.

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
30 October 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0720
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans she has to improve data processing at the Marine Management Organisation.

Asked by
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
80892
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint
Answering member
Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
17 September 2025
Reference
848 cc145-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this instrument was laid before the House on 7 July. The then Home Secretary and the current Home Secretary have exercised powers under Section 82(2A) of the Data Protection Act 2018 to specify in this instrument the qualifying competent authorities that will be able to apply for a...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 September 2025
Reference
848 cc145-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this instrument is a welcome step in increasing the efficacy of our data sharing and protecting our national security interests. Until the enactment of this instrument, authorities processing information under the Data Protection Act 2018 have been subject to two separate legislative data-processing regimes for law enforcement and...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 September 2025
Reference
848 cc146-7GC
House
House of Lords