Skip to main content

1-100 of 274 results for subject:Extortion

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Examination of witnesses. Committee adjourned till 5 February. Written evidence reported to the House.

Lead member
Kanishka Narayan
Answering member
Ben Spencer
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Committee
Date
3 February 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to protect (a) children and (b) young people from online sextortion.

Asked by
Liz Jarvis (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
75152
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many times NHS trusts have been victims of ransomware attacks in the last 12 months; and whether (a) data has been (i) lost and (ii) made public and (b) a ransom has been paid in each case.

Asked by
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2024
Reference
23406
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
HC 601 2023-24; HL 74 2023-24
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
4 December 2023
Reference
HC 194 2023-24; HL 23 2023-24
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to help prevent criminal organisations committing sextortion offences.

Asked by
Matt Vickers (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 September 2023
Reference
199234
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
13 September 2023
Reference
HC 850 2022-23
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
19 June 2023
Reference
HC 850 2022-23
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
HC 850 2022-23
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, on how many occasions individuals contacted Action Fraud to report that third parties had unsuccessfully tried to defraud them using denial of service extortion or other hacking scams n (a) 2019-20, (b) 2020-21 and (c) 2021-22; and how many of...

Asked by
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2023
Reference
129743
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
HC 850 2022-23
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
12 December 2022
Reference
HC 850 2022-23
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
28 November 2022
Reference
HC 850 2022-23
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what is her policy on the payment of ransoms both for (a) individuals and (b) in response to cyberattacks.

Asked by
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2020
Reference
100285
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the respective Nationality Acts of (1) China, and (2) Iran, on British dual nationals, in particular their impact on general safety, vulnerability to blackmail and security risks; what advice they give those dual nationals when travelling to those countries; and what...

Asked by
Viscount Waverley (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
HL16630
House
House of Lords
Member
Toby Perkins (Labour)
Type
Ten minute rule bills
Date
22 May 2019
Reference
Bill 393 2017-19
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make it a criminal offence to demand money to vacate an unauthorised encampment; and for connected purposes.

The relationship between the Traveller community and the resident community is one of the most tense of any in our society....

Member
Toby Perkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2019
Reference
660 cc771-3
House
House of Commons

Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 393). To be read a second time.

Lead member
Toby Perkins
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 May 2019
Reference
660 cc770-3
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many successful prosecutions have been brought for the offence of blackmail against people that demanded money to leave sites which they are occupying illegally in each year since 2010.

Asked by
Toby Perkins (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 May 2019
Reference
255320
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of reports of senior officials of the National Congress Party in Sudan, including President al-Bashir, discussing blackmail and other tactics to achieve a settlement in South Kordofan and the Blue Nile; and whether such reports will influence their engagement with...

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2018
Reference
HL11947
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Kennedy for supporting me and to the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for adding his name to this amendment, which is one in

search of an easy resolution—and I hope it can be done very quickly. The Minister and his colleagues...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2017
Reference
787 cc1656-7
House
House of Lords

Her Majesty's Government what support they have offered to the French authorities in their action against Teodorin Obiang, Vice-President of Equatorial Guinea, in relation to allegations of embezzlement, corruption and extortion in that state.

Asked by
Lord Chidgey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 July 2017
Reference
HL334
House
House of Lords

Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to make early and extensive use of the new Unexplained Wealth Orders, in the light of the Obiang case in France in which the Vice-President of Equatorial Guineas is alleged to have committed embezzlement, corruption and extortion in that state.

Asked by
Lord Chidgey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 July 2017
Reference
HL335
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to prevent extortion cases.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2016
Reference
23050
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what information his Department holds on how many Facebook profile pages based in the UK were closed down in 2014 following reports of online abuse and blackmail.

Asked by
David Simpson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2015
Reference
8480
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of legislation against online blackmail of children.

Asked by
David Simpson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2015
Reference
8475
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions he has had with Ministerial colleagues in other departments on steps to reduce online bullying and blackmail of children.

Asked by
David Simpson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Culture Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2015
Reference
1987
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 28/07/2014 from Theresa May MP to Elfyn Llwyd MP regarding Lady Justice Macur's review of the Waterhouse Inquiry and other points raised in response to the statement regarding the sexual abuse of children and the Government's intended response. 4 p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
28 July 2014
Reference
DEP2014-1161
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people convicted of the offence of blackmail since 1990 were sentenced to a period of imprisonment of seven years or more.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
507 c473W; 321277
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations she has received from Tesco supermarket on threatening letters received from animal rights activists; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2007
Reference
154379; 464 c649W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which asylum seekers resident in Birmingham, Selly Oak constituency have had cases heard by judges (a) Illyas Khan and (b) J, involved in the Roselane Driza case.

Asked by
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
156386; 464 c176W
House
House of Commons

Following the questions raised about the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission, I can tell the House that I have just received some ex cathedra information in order to, as it were, revise my memory. The commission supported the principle of retaining access to some form of non-jury trial. It did,...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c906
House
House of Commons

I think that the whole House welcomes the improvements in the security situation in Northern Ireland, which have made it possible for the Government to present the Bill today. The most recent summary was in the Independent Monitoring Commission’s 12th report in October this year. It stated that the commission...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c905-6
House
House of Commons

The Bill departs from the emergency powers legislation and the powers now embodied in part VII of the Terrorism Act 2000. I welcome the fact that such a move is now possible. I accept, too, the Government’s argument that although we all want a presumption in favour of trial by...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c906-7
House
House of Commons

I am glad that my hon. Friend is pleased that we are doing something that he advocated a long time ago. The commission is broadly pleased with what we are doing because it asked us to do those things. He should be charitable about that and support us.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c905
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State said that the Human Rights Commission has welcomed the extra powers. Does he recognise that many of us advocated those extra powers from day one? Indeed, that was reflected in the powers given to the Irish Human Rights Commission, which was also set up because of...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c905
House
House of Commons

I have no recollection of any formal representations on the matter. I am not saying that that they were or were not made; it is simply that I have no recollection of them. The commission’s main concerns were about its own role, and about provision being made for it to...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c905
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for giving way, but had he answered my question I would not have had to intervene again. Will he give a direct response? What was the response of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission to the extension of non-jury trials, as set out in...

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c905
House
House of Commons

I am aware of the position of the hon. Gentleman’s party on that, because the right hon. Member for North Antrim (Rev. Ian Paisley) and his colleagues have made that point to me repeatedly. On the other hand, I have talked to Unionist members of the commission, or those who...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c904
House
House of Commons

As I said, it is my responsibility to introduce the Bill, but the commission has welcomed the additional powers that it provides. It asked for them and I am providing them, so of course it is pleased. Giving the commission the power to rely on the European convention on human...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c904-5
House
House of Commons

As the Secretary of State has praised in the warmest of terms the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and said that it plays a major role, what major role did it play in responding to the extension of non-jury trials? What was its response to the Bill?

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c904
House
House of Commons

Is there not a problem with the Human Rights Commission in so far as there is still a concern within the Unionist community that its membership is not broadly reflective of the wider community? If the Secretary of State is going to give it additional powers, does he not need...

Member
Jeffrey M Donaldson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c904
House
House of Commons

Yes, it would be a wholly different matter, as I said. I considered that carefully and discussed it with those who would be involved in it, including the Chief Constable and his senior officers, and I am sure that we are taking the right approach in the circumstances in Northern...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c903-4
House
House of Commons

Not for ever. The Secretary of State implied that the trial judge could reject the certificate if it was unreasonable, which would be a sensible compromise, but that is not what the Bill does. Clause 2 simply says that the DPP will lodge the certificate with the court. There is...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c903
House
House of Commons

Will we get rid of you after this?

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c903
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State give way?

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c903
House
House of Commons

We have had pregnancies and three-point turns; I do not know what we will have next. I have a lot of respect for my hon. Friend on this and other issues, but that is not what I was saying. My point was that if the DPP judges that there is...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c903
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State’s point adds to our concerns rather than takes away from them. He suggested that the DPP would use the powers not just because of a risk to the administration of justice, but because of a risk to national security. Has the Secretary of State let the...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c903
House
House of Commons

There is balance. Otherwise, as I explained, there would be a risk to national security with the possibility of intelligence getting into the wrong hands. I repeat: the Bill is designed to ensure that juryless trials are the exception and hardly ever occur. We have looked at the process extremely...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c902-3
House
House of Commons

There is no balance.

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c902
House
House of Commons

I do not quite follow my hon. Friend’s point on the devolution arguments, so I would be grateful if he clarified it. I was making the point that when we get devolution of policing and justice and when there is a policing and justice Minister—whether it be from the SDLP,...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c919-20
House
House of Commons

I will return to that point later, but it is clear that the Secretary of State presumes that the powers being exercised by the Secretary of State would not be devolved. That is making quite an assumption. The parties in Northern Ireland that will be discussing questions of the devolution...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c920-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is putting up an entirely false proposition. As Secretary of State, I cannot challenge the DPP now; nor can my security Minister, the Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, my hon. Friend the Member for Wythenshawe and Sale, East (Paul Goggins). We do not challenge the DPP....

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c922
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for that attempt to clarify. To be very clear to him, I am not making a meal of this. I do not introduce Bills and clauses into the House only to reverse them, pull them, change them and turn them upside down in subsequent...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c922-3
House
House of Commons

With the Bill, it is important to be very specific about the powers that we are introducing, rather than running away with wider rhetoric. Yes, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State mentioned national security, but what he means—this is important in these deliberations—is that if a defendant has...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c923
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for that attempt to clarify. I hope that he can point us, either now or in future, to exactly where the Bill makes that very precise clarification. I see it nowhere in the Bill. The hon. Member for Montgomeryshire touched on just how sweeping the conditions...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c923
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman not concentrating an awful lot of his time in the debate on, and getting excited about, the subject of a Ministry of Policing and Justice, when the reality of the devolution of policing and justice and that ministry is not on the horizon?

Member
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c923
House
House of Commons

If the DPP for Northern Ireland had to put an application before a judge, would the hon. Gentleman and his party accept the clause? That condition was included in the similar provision for non-jury trials in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, at a time when jury tampering was a real...

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c916
House
House of Commons

The Bill is presented in the name of normalisation, but the reality is that some of its provisions are about normalising the abnormal emergency provisions that were resorted to in the context of the troubles. During the darkest days of the troubles the rule of law often appeared to be...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c917-9
House
House of Commons

I shall write to the hon. Lady with the detailed answer that her question deserves. I assure her that I shall talk to her about the matter at greater length once I and my hon. Friend the Member for Argyll and Bute (Mr. Reid), who is listening to the debate,...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c916-7
House
House of Commons

I give way.

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c925
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman take some solace and encouragement from the comments of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland? In response to an intervention about what the judge could do if the judge was not happy with the DPP’s decision to have a non-jury court, he said ““The judge...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c925
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman knows that our point is that all parties should explicitly give that support, which is why we had no issue with, for example, extending the terms of the ministerial pledge of office to include that very statement. What we are saying to Sinn Fein is that the...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c924-5
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that point. He draws attention to the fact that the Secretary of State offered an assurance that completely contradicts the Bill that he is presenting. The Bill is at pains to ensure that there can be no challenge by a judge or anyone else...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c925
House
House of Commons

Surely, the vast majority of the people of Northern Ireland already have confidence in the police and in the service and protection that they give to the people of Northern Ireland. They deserve our wholehearted support.

Member
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c924
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman knows that when that Bill was being considered in the House we had tabled amendments that would have unpicked the triple lock. Indeed, during consideration of the Northern Ireland (St Andrews Agreement) Bill, which was before the House only a couple of weeks ago, there was...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c924
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman now telling the House that his policy is to reject the miscellaneous law and that we should change the 2006 Act to give a freeway for Sinn Fein to get into power?

Member
Lord Bannside (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c924
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a point coming from his political angle. I will not be drawn into that debate in relation to the question of the timing of the devolution of justice and policing or anything else. We want it to happen sooner rather than later. We did not agree...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c923-4
House
House of Commons

I note what the hon. Gentleman says about the work of the Human Rights Commission. Since prisons are already heavily regulated and inspected by inspectors of prisons, prison visitors and so on, what added value will it bring to the prison regime in Northern Ireland?

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c931
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman reaffirms his point. I hope that that message will go to Sinn Fein because it is the one vital step that must be taken before devolution can be restored in Northern Ireland. I do not agree with everything that the Democratic Unionist party or any other party...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c927-8
House
House of Commons

It is exceedingly generous of the hon. Gentleman to allow me to intervene. Before he completes his contribution and proceeds to support the Bill without any hesitation, may I ask him, as the Member representing South Staffordshire—a constituency in England, obviously—whether he is content for the Northern Ireland Human Rights...

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c928
House
House of Commons

We will have to wait to see whether they will affect my constituency or not. I did not say that I supported the Bill unreservedly; the hon. Lady takes my words a step too far. I said that I was content to support it. I am particularly concerned about the...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c929
House
House of Commons

I approach the debate as someone who is interested—too interested, some would say—in Northern Ireland. Even so, I am an outside observer. We are talking about ““normalisation””—a horrible word—and how far we have gone down the road to achieve it. Yesterday, some of us were in Northern Ireland for the...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c929-31
House
House of Commons

I thought that I was ending my speech, rather than giving way to the hon. Gentleman. I am not sure that he accurately represents the Human Rights Commission’s position. Indeed, I do not think that the Secretary of State fully and accurately represented its position. However, we will allow the...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c926
House
House of Commons

Given the earlier reservations that Members had about much of the legislation, does it surprise the hon. Gentleman that the Human Rights Commission has no such fears about the impact that the legislation might have on the human rights of people who would be subjected to these regulations?

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c926
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c927
House
House of Commons

I will be rather briefer, I hope, than the hon. Member for Foyle (Mark Durkan), although of course he took several lengthy interventions. I give my broad support to the Bill, but as the Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, the hon. Member for Wythenshawe and Sale, East (Paul Goggins),...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c926-7
House
House of Commons

The Bill makes some provisions in respect of jurors that we do not take issue with. We see the need to protect jurors. However, when the Government presented the Terrorism Act 2006, they were clear that the circumstances were going to allow Diplock courts to be abolished after, at the...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c925-6
House
House of Commons

I hear what the hon. Gentleman says about tribunals and judicial review, but should not the decisions to which he refers at least be subject to independent assessment by a senior judge? His agreement or disagreement could then be made known within the system.

Member
Eddie McGrady (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c939
House
House of Commons

Such checks already exist. The DPP for Northern Ireland must make his decisions about whether a case should go to a non-jury court according to a set of criteria. The Secretary of State has pointed out that, although a judge cannot challenge such decisions, he can speak to the DPP...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c939
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her intervention, which gives me the opportunity to respond—although not as blastingly as she did—that the UN principles state that where there is no national organisation, as there is not in the situation we are discussing, the rights and privileges of such a commission...

Member
Eddie McGrady (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c936-8
House
House of Commons

I wish to make it clear, as my right hon. Friend the Member for North Antrim (Rev. Ian Paisley) has done already, that the Bill is unnecessary and could be dangerous to the pursuit of security in Northern Ireland. The situation does not warrant such changes. As the Secretary of...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c938-9
House
House of Commons

I am most grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving way. There are many Members in this Chamber whom I would sometimes wish to blast at—they are sitting to my right on the Democratic Unionist party Benches—but the hon. Gentleman is not one of them. I have a simple inquiry....

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c936
House
House of Commons

I shall do so shortly, after I have pursued my point a little further. Also, let me say that the hon. Lady has a most melodious voice and I would like to hear her question, but as I have difficulty hearing because of my personal disability, when she asks her...

Member
Eddie McGrady (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c936
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c936
House
House of Commons

I am glad to follow the right hon. Member for North Antrim (Rev. Ian Paisley). I welcomed what I took to be his total, unqualified commitment to the pursuit of partnership in the administration of Northern Ireland. I hope that that, in conjunction with the commitment of the associated parties,...

Member
Eddie McGrady (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c935-6
House
House of Commons

When Governments bring in legislation, they often face the criticism that it is too little, too late. On the contrary, I fear that the centrepiece of this legislation represents a move too far and too soon. The record will show that I am no supporter of the Diplock courts. In...

Member
Lord Bannside (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c932-5
House
House of Commons

This debate is about what is and what is not normal. The hon. Gentleman knows better than I do that this is a matter of trust. People from certain areas of Northern Ireland give the commission the trust that they do not give to other bodies. We may not like...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c931-2
House
House of Commons

The point is that, although Departments have that responsibility, they cannot be relied on to discharge it fairly and competently. That is why they rely on consultants. Even when they rely on consultants, as we saw with the electronic human resources contract, the Department of Finance and Personnel said that...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c942-3
House
House of Commons

This is the amazing point. Let me just take the last point that the hon. Gentleman made: the commission will have the job of proofing Government policies. I thought that Departments already had to do the job of providing equality-proofing and so on for legislation and other proposals. Are we...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c942
House
House of Commons

I have another difficulty with the hon. Gentleman. I understood that all this equality-proofing stuff came from the Belfast agreement, of which he and the SDLP were partly the authors. If he did not trust Departments to do the job, why on earth was it ever written into the arrangements...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c943
House
House of Commons

May I draw the hon. Gentleman’s attention to the fact that clause 7 provides that no court can review a decision by the DPP unless there has been dishonesty or bad faith? The DPP’s decision cannot even be nullified"““by reason of lack of jurisdiction or error of law””." Surely to...

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c939
House
House of Commons

That might be a difficulty for the hon. Lady and the SDLP, but my party believes that there should be a presumption in favour of non-jury trials anyway, so that is not a big issue for us. The assumption behind many of the complaints aired today is that non-jury trials...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c940-1
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman implying that there should be the same investigatory powers for the Army as for the police at present?

Member
Alasdair McDonnell (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c941
House
House of Commons

I am saying that where the police and Army are operating together on the ground, the Army personnel need the same powers—to stop, search and arrest people and perhaps to search premises—as the police. The investigatory powers of the Army are governed by the Army’s own strictures and that is...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c941
House
House of Commons

I am genuinely grateful to the hon. Gentleman for taking so many interventions. I may be absolutely wrong on this, but I had understood that when the Secretary of State set up the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission, he wanted to make it more representative of the community, as there...

Member
Lady Hermon (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c941
House
House of Commons

It would be most bizarre and we might well come in for some condemnation if we were seen to be pulling the strings of someone who is supposed to be an independent member of the commission, albeit coming from a particular persuasion. We do not seek to do that, as...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c941-2
House
House of Commons

As well as refuting the hon. Gentleman’s gross allegations against the police ombudsman’s office, I ask him whether he agrees that the fact that he is saying that he cannot think of something that the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission has done shows that it is not doing the damage...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c942
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I will not detain the House for long, but you will recall that I raised my objection to the scheduling of Northern Ireland business at the same time as the Welsh Grand Committee. You advised me to pursue the matter through the usual...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c893
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time. Three weeks ago, Royal Assent was given to legislation that cleared the way for the restoration of locally accountable, democratic, power-sharing government in Northern Ireland. As the House knows, the Government are firmly committed to the aim...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c893-4
House
House of Commons