Skip to main content

1-100 of 499 results for subject:Forgery

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the number of people who have entered the UK illegally using forged (a) passports and (b) visas in the last five years.

Asked by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2025
Reference
75928
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people have been arrested for using forged passports at airports in the last 12 months.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2025
Reference
24171
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
9 February 2023
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the letters from the Chair of the House of Commons Treasury Committee to the Financial Conduct Authority and the National Economic Crime Centre on 15 October 2020, how many banks have been (1) investigated, and (2) prosecuted, for forging customer signatures.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2022
Reference
HL2851
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she expects the National Economic Crime Centre to conclude its investigation into alleged signatory fraud by banks; what steps she is taking to help ensure that the investigation is concluded in a timely way; and if she will make...

Asked by
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 2022
Reference
31749
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the letters from the Chair of the House of Commons Treasury Committee to the Financial Conduct Authority and the National Economic Crime Centre on 15 October 2020, how many banks have been (1) investigated, and (2) prosecuted, for forging customer signatures.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 cc755-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the National Economic Crime Centre continues to assess the material submitted to it in relation to alleged signatory fraud by banks, as well as information obtained following preliminary inquiries to clarify matters with certain members of the public who raised the issue. The National Economic Crime Centre is making a thorough assessment to determine whether there are grounds for a criminal investigation.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c755
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not really satisfied with the Minister’s reply. Banks have forged customers’ signatures and fabricated evidence on an industrial scale in order to repossess people’s homes and businesses. More than 700 crime reports and 26 lever-arch files of evidence have been submitted to the NECC over the last three years and there has still been no action, as the Minister said. I ask him if he will, first, appoint an independent inquiry into this obfuscation and, secondly, meet me and a delegation of the victims to hear their concerns.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c755
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that characterisation of the situation is not entirely fair. The NECC is reviewing the evidence submitted to it by the campaign groups. We cannot comment further at this stage, recognising the NECC’s operational independence.

Once it has finished its review, it will communicate its findings. The noble Lord referred to the 26 lever-arch files; these actually contain 10,000 pages of evidence in seven staggered submissions, the last set of which was delivered in March 2021. This was subsequently referred to the various subject-matter experts at the SFO and the FCA. These are complex matters and they take time.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c755
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the case of Lynch v Cadwallader & Anor in February 2021, the High Court ruled that Aldermore, a bank, cannot enforce a personal guarantee to cover £1.2 million against a businessman because the signature on the document was not his. The court said that it was signed by a “person at the Bank”. Could the Minister explain why this did not trigger any investigation or prosecutions?

Asked by
Baroness Blower (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I cannot; I am not familiar with the case. As I said, we maintain that the NECC should have operational independence, so I am afraid that I cannot enlighten the noble Baroness any further. I neglected to answer the noble Lord’s request for a meeting; there have been a number of meetings with Home Office officials, but I would of course be happy to meet him.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it the case that the Government are on the side of fat-cat bankers rather than customers? Would it not be a good idea to give more resources to the police so that they can actually investigate, prosecute and bring to justice these people?

Asked by
Lord Watts (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad that the noble Lord has raised the subject of resources, because we are giving them: the spending review last year allocated a further £400 million to tackle economic crime over the next three years. This includes £100 million earmarked specifically to target fraud, including by establishing a national fraud policing network, including greater fraud investigative capacity in the NCA, meeting a manifesto commitment to create a new national cybercrime force focused on fraud. In addition, new fraud investigation teams have been piloted in four regional organised crime units, which will be expanded and rolled out across all ROCUs. These new capabilities are driven by a new tasking and co-ordination process run by the NECC. Finally, as part of the police uplift, we are prioritising more investigators for the City of London Police, which leads on this.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister was quite rightly concerned about operational independence in an earlier answer. In that light, is it really appropriate that Lloyds Bank, one of the suspect banks, has directly funded the City of London Police to the tune of £1.5 million since 2019?

Asked by
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness is referring to Action Fraud, which is receiving some funding—but the money is ring-fenced from another source. I cannot find the precise reference to it

now, but I will write to her with the details. However, it is not from Lloyds Bank directly.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what additional action have the Government taken since the noble Lord, Lord Agnew, resigned, saying that he could no longer defend the Government’s action on fraud?

Asked by
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that was a completely different case, of course. But we are doing a number of things, as the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, will be aware. Some of this is legislative and some of it is to do with the various taskforces and strategies that I highlighted to some extent earlier. A Joint Fraud Taskforce was set up in October 2021.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, lack of prosecution is a theme today. So much crime has moved online; what we have heard about in this Question is an example of how that has happened. Can we increase the resources for the police and prosecution in respect of digital fraud? My own experience of Action Fraud—admittedly some time ago—was that it was absolutely pathetic.

Asked by
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend is right to raise the changing nature of some of these crimes. I am sure that she is partly referring to the UKFI report on fraud, published earlier this week, which showed that some types of fraud are in fact diminishing while others are increasing. A number of actions are being taken: for example, I am sure that noble Lords were surprised to note that the text messages that we used to receive seem to have diminished somewhat, which is partly a response to work done by the telecoms companies. The National Cyber Security Centre has also launched its suspicious email reporting service to remove harmful scams from online. Since April 2020, it has taken down 81,000 scams across 147,000 URLs.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is active concern about not just fraud but money laundering and large-scale bribery—money laundering not only from former socialist states such as Russia but from the Middle East, and bribery also in terms of a number of the Middle East autocracies. This does not seem to be a priority for the Government yet. Is this also where we need a considerable reinforcement of officials who deal with these subjects?

Asked by
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not think it is just about officials; it is also about legislation. Obviously, we passed one Act earlier this year at speed. The noble Lord will be aware that there is another economic crime and corporate transparency Bill on its way which deals with many of the unresolved issues from those debates and that Act.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, yesterday’s Times newspaper reported that money lost to scams had risen by more than £160 million in a year, from £420 million to £583 million, which is a

huge increase. Can the Minister say when we might expect the financial services and markets Bill to come before Parliament and whether that Bill will be directed to tackling fraud?

Asked by
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I cannot answer that question; I will try to find out and write to the noble Lord.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as one of those who drafted, or helped to draft, the anti-money laundering directives in Brussels—I emphasise that they were directives—I nevertheless have certain concerns about the way in which the Financial Conduct Authority has interpreted them, in particular the parts that offered proportionality in the application of regulation. A lot of small investors have suffered as a result of an overzealousness of the banking institutions sometimes to do things they do not need to do and to inquire in ways they do not need to inquire. Does my noble friend agree that proportionality should be deployed properly by the Financial Conduct Authority?

Asked by
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

I agree with my noble friend. We are straying away from the Home Office brief on this subject. Obviously, the Financial Services Act 2012 established the FCA as the conduct of business regulator for financial services. It has a focused set of objectives to promote effective competition in the interests of consumers, to secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers and to protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system, but I absolutely agree that proportionality has to be a part of that.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I am sure the Minister will know, in May 2019 Dame Elizabeth Gloster was appointed to investigate the collapse of London Capital & Finance and published a damning report in November 2021. Blackmore Bond is also about mini-bonds and poor regulation, yet no investigator has been appointed. Can the Minister explain why this is the case?

Asked by
Lord Woodley (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I have to refer the noble Lord back to my earlier answer about the operational independence of the NECC. I do not know what the evidential situation is. How can I possibly answer the question?

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
28 February 2022
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress they have made in (1) investigating, and (2) prosecuting, allegations of banks forging customers’ signatures.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2021
Reference
HL4311
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department has made representations to the National Crime Agency on forged bank signatures cases in the last 12 months.

Asked by
Anneliese Dodds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 September 2021
Reference
37571
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many meetings his Department has had with the Bank Signature Forgery Campaign on bank signature forgeries in the last three years.

Asked by
Anneliese Dodds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 September 2021
Reference
38412
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they will take to stop fake positive COVID-19 test results being used to require school pupils to self-isolate.

Asked by
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 2021
Reference
HL2032
House
House of Lords

Madam Deputy Speaker, I notice a slightly raised eyebrow or slightly furrowed brow, because by convention we would not talk about individual peers in a disobliging way. There is an ancient practice for removing peerages, which is by Bill of attainder, but looking at the Clerk at the Table, I...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2021
Reference
696 c575
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the Leader of the House agrees that Lord Hall has very serious questions to answer regarding the re-employment of Mr Martin Bashir at the BBC. Will the Leader of the House let me know whether there is any mechanism that can be deployed, or that has...

Member
Ian Jnr Paisley (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Business questions
Date
27 May 2021
Reference
696 c575
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Government’s review of the BBC’s governance. However, contrary to the noble Lord, Lord Hamilton, I was concerned this morning that the director-general of the BBC said he had no intention of airing the Princess Diana interview ever again. I understand, given the shocking circumstances under which Martin...

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the findings of Lord Dyson’s report into the BBC.

Lead member
Baroness Barran
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 cc901-5
House
House of Lords

It is obviously up to the board of the BBC to determine the scope of the review. I am sure the noble Baroness has seen the letter today from the chief executive

of Ofcom about its work in this area. It is all part of an effort to rebuild trust...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c902
House
House of Lords

We absolutely agree—we want a strong and successful public broadcasting system, and that needs the BBC to be a central part of it. As my right honourable friend the Secretary of State made clear in his recent article in the Times, there will be no knee-jerk reaction.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is absolutely right that the BBC needs urgently to demonstrate that the failings to which he refers have been addressed, that they can never happen again, and that trust is restored in a culture of transparency and accountability within the BBC.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

I do not completely agree with the noble Baroness: I think part of the role of good governance is to check that inbreeding is not happening within an organisation, and that the governance structure reinforces the culture necessary to deliver on the mission of the organisation. In relation to internal

notus-xml...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

I absolutely agree: it is essential that the BBC can operate with editorial independence and integrity, and nothing we are doing will compromise that.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

My noble friend’s first question falls into the area of editorial independence, although I share the very real concerns he raises. On the forgery of the bank statements, as my right honourable friend the Minister for Media and Data set out, my understanding is that a request has gone to...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

I can only repeat what I said earlier, which is that that appears to me to sit as an editorial decision for the BBC.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

The mid-term review is really a health check point that was built in to the charter review process to look at the effectiveness of governance and regulation, rather than the more widespread suggestions the noble Lord makes.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord raises another troubling example. All of these will be important to address if the BBC is to rebuild the trust we all wish it to have.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is right to question the culture of the BBC. We welcome the fact that the new chair and director-general are doing the same, as my noble friend says, in relation not just to some of the serious failings we have heard about in the Chamber today and...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the blunt findings of the report by Lord Dyson make for deeply troubling reading, and I welcome the unequivocal apology by the director-general of the BBC and the review into editorial practices and culture. Is the Minister satisfied that the scope of the review will ensure that such...

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c902
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome the fact that the Government agree that, in an era of fake news, public service broadcasting has never been more important. The Bashir story is truly shocking, but I worked as a journalist at the BBC for many years and know that the vast majority abide...

Member
Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the comments made by the ministerial teams in both this House and the other place over the last day or so. I also welcome the announcement by the DCMS Select Committee that it will look at this matter. I therefore call on the BBC to clear...

Member
Lord Hayward (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

I declare an interest as a former BBC governor. The problem of trust in the BBC today is not, at core, one of governance; it is one of inbreeding. Ofcom is not the solution, for it too has many former BBC employees on its committees. The chances of a complaint...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I condemn Bashir’s deceitfulness and the subsequent cover-up, can the Minister reassure the House that the BBC board and director-general will be allowed to get on with the review they have announced without interference by the Government? Moreover, does she agree that any further steps to alter...

Member
Baroness Blackstone (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

The BBC operates under a royal charter; does it not therefore have an obligation not to broadcast interviews with Diana, Princess of Wales, that can only undermine our monarchy? Secondly, Martin Bashir was found by the Dyson report to have actually been implicit in forging bank statements. Is this not...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that now is an opportune time for the BBC to acknowledge the serious flaws within the system and to learn the lessons from the failures of the past, not only in the Bashir saga but in other unbalanced reporting of events? Is the mid-term

review not...

Member
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I agree with Mr Whittingdale’s comments in the other place, will the review reconsider my complaints about a fairly recent programme commemorating the Caernarvon investiture, with unsubstantiated allegations of the use of agents provocateur and fixing of the date of court hearings being defended by the noble...

Member
Lord Morris of Aberavon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I dealt with BBC News for many years and I regret to say that, despite being known—I hope—for straight dealing, I found it almost impossible to get an error corrected or the semblance of an apology from it. I encountered, I fear, a well-entrenched and regrettable defensiveness. Does...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

Urgent question on the findings of Lord Dyson’s report into the BBC.

Lead member
Julian Knight
Answering member
John Whittingdale
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Urgent questions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 cc37-51
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport if he will make a statement on the findings of Lord Dyson’s report into the BBC.

Member
Julian Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c38
House
House of Commons

Lord Dyson’s report makes shocking reading. It details not just an appalling failure to uphold basic journalistic standards but an unwillingness to investigate complaints and to discover the truth. That these failures occurred at our national broadcaster is an even greater source of shame. The new leadership at the BBC...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c38
House
House of Commons

Lord Dyson’s report was utterly damning. Put simply, Mr Bashir has obtained fame and fortune by instituting document forgery and callously scaring a mentally vulnerable woman—not a mistake, as he claims in The Sunday Times, but something with more than a whiff of criminality about it. The BBC then covered...

Member
Julian Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 cc38-9
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on his urgent question. He maintains the fine tradition of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee asking probing and incisive questions. The questions he raises are valid. The process by which Martin Bashir was recruited to return to the BBC, and his subsequent resignation...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c39
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Solihull (Julian Knight) for securing this urgent question, and the Minister for his response. I also echo the many expressions of deep concern about the actions of Martin Bashir 25 years ago, and the deception he used to secure the interview with Diana, Princess...

Member
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 cc39-40
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady, and I agree with very much—indeed, almost everything—she said. On the governance of the BBC, as I said earlier, fundamental changes were made a few years ago, which we believe would have meant that somebody who wished to blow the whistle in the way that...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c40
House
House of Commons

May I say to my right hon. Friend that he acted properly, in 2015, when he appointed Sir David Clementi to review the BBC? The Government were right to accept Sir David Clementi’s recommendations, which came only a few months later, putting right the absurd arrangements made in 2007 that...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c40
House
House of Commons

I must thank my hon. Friend for his words. He is absolutely right that the previous governance arrangements were deeply flawed, and Sir David Clementi, who conducted the review and then went on to become chair of the BBC, put in place a much stronger governance system, with both a...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c40
House
House of Commons

The BBC has questions to answer about its cover-up culture. Why did Director-General Tony Hall bring back Martin Bashir only five years ago as religion correspondent, given that he knew he had lied over the process used to secure the Princess Diana documentary? Who else was involved in the recruitment?...

Member
John Nicolson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c41
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman speaks with experience, as a former employee of the BBC, and he raises extremely valid questions. As I say, the BBC is conducting an urgent investigation into the circumstances of the employment of Martin Bashir, but if questions remain following that, I have no doubt that the...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c41
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend make it clear that both the BBC and Ofcom must understand that, following next year’s mid-term review, the Government propose to vary the charter and to make the guidelines, impartiality rules and complaints procedures subject to parliamentary approval, without any so-called independent editorial standards board,...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c41
House
House of Commons

I do not want to pre-empt either the BBC’s review of editorial oversight or the mid-term review, which we are only just beginning to work on, but my hon. Friend makes some extremely valid points. We placed impartiality in the first line of the BBC’s public purposes at the time...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c41
House
House of Commons

All over the world, people are appalled by the dishonesty and cruelty of the way Martin Bashir secured his interview with a very vulnerable Princess Diana 25 years ago. It is right that the BBC itself reviews again its editorial practices and how Martin Bashir came to be employed, but...

Member
Diane Abbott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c41
House
House of Commons

I absolutely assure the right hon. Lady that there is no question of dismantling or defunding the BBC. It is a priceless national asset, and one of the most serious consequences of the revelations of the past week is that its reputation and trust in it have been badly damaged....

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c42
House
House of Commons

The BBC has seen a string of public scandals, from Jimmy Savile to the treatment of Lord McAlpine, Sir Cliff Richard and many others. All have stemmed from a drive to secure sensationalist media headlines, along with groupthink and a “we know best” approach. The BBC’s capacity to scrutinise, investigate...

Member
Alun Cairns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c42
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend. He is entirely right that this is not a one-off incident. There have been dreadful failings by the BBC in its journalism in recent years, and he mentioned three of them. I would say that all of those happened before the new charter...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c42
House
House of Commons

David Plowright, the chair and managing director of Granada Television in its great days, used to say regularly that he needed the BBC to keep the commercial sector honest. If the BBC cannot keep itself honest, we are in real trouble. Does the Minister agree that the changes at the...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c42
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with the hon. Gentleman. Indeed, my right hon. Friend the Member for Vale of Glamorgan (Alun Cairns) made the same point immediately before him. It is right that the BBC investigates the precise circumstances that led to Martin Bashir’s interview and the subsequent failure to investigate...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c42
House
House of Commons

When are we going to have the guts to stop the BBC criminalising people for non-payment of the licence fee, which is no better than the poll tax?

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c42
House
House of Commons

I understand my right hon. Friend’s strength of feeling. As he will know, we have now twice examined whether non-payment of the licence fee should be decriminalised, but this has revealed that if we decriminalise, there is a risk that the alternative enforcement mechanisms would lead to more distress for...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c43
House
House of Commons

As the House is aware, I am a Scottish politician. During the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, the BBC came under strong and sustained attack from the then First Minister, Mr Alex Salmond, a gentleman who now broadcasts on Russian television and refuses to acknowledge the enormity of the crime that...

Member
Jamie Stone (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c43
House
House of Commons

I do agree with the hon. Gentleman. The independence of the BBC is absolutely central to its reputation for objectivity and reliability, and indeed it contrasts strongly with the channel that he also mentioned, RT, which has none of those things. We are absolutely committed to maintaining and indeed strengthening...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c43
House
House of Commons

My constituents in Stourbridge value the importance of public service broadcasting and a free press, as do I. Does my right hon. Friend agree that the BBC needs to improve its culture with a new emphasis on accuracy, impartiality and diversity of opinion, to ensure that the failures highlighted by...

Member
Suzanne Webb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c43
House
House of Commons

I do agree with my hon. Friend. She is absolutely right to say that it is those qualities of accuracy, impartiality and fairness that are admired around the world as being as being represented by the BBC. That is why the revelations in the Dyson report are so damaging, because...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c43
House
House of Commons

I welcome, in general, the tone that the Minister has adopted today in response to this. He said in his statement that

“the need for public service broadcasting and trusted journalism has never been stronger.”

He is absolutely right about that. That was also the conclusion of our Select Committee, the Digital,...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c43
House
House of Commons

I am, Madam Deputy Speaker.

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c44
House
House of Commons

With your indulgence, Madam Deputy Speaker, and I apologise.

“It’s important for us to also reiterate that the BBC is not its management, past or present. The BBC and the values and principles of public service broadcasting it personifies is in fact our members, and all its staff, who do the...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c44
House
House of Commons

I do agree with that statement. There is no question but that the challenge posed by fake news and disinformation, which are circulating at a level we have never previously seen, makes it all the more important that there are trustworthy, reliable places where one can go without questioning the...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c44
House
House of Commons

I was very struck by Matty Syed’s comment in The Sunday Times yesterday about “institutional narcissism” in the BBC. Although that might be slightly provocative, does my right hon. Friend believe that the current leadership of the BBC has a real sense of the cultural change that many believe is...

Member
Julie Marson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c44
House
House of Commons

There is no question but that even before Lord Dyson’s report was published there was a widespread feeling that the culture in the BBC needed to change—that it was made up too much of people of the same mindset and the same background and from the same part of the...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c44
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful for this urgent question. In its response to Lord Dyson’s report, the BBC board has said that it will review and assess

“the robustness and independence of whistleblowing processes”.

How important does the Secretary of State consider independence on whistleblowing, including the protection of whistleblowers, to be?

Member
Janet Daby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c44
House
House of Commons

I regard it as absolutely essential in not just the BBC but all public bodies. We need to make sure that, in future, if somebody blows the whistle and exposes malpractice in the BBC, the consequence is that somebody else gets fired, not that they do.

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c44
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend agree that part of the problem in the culture of the BBC is that people often confuse the need to be accountable with a threat to the independence of their editorial judgment and that they therefore avoid that accountability? Does the board now accept that...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c45
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that we need to see much stronger oversight of the editorial decision-making process in the BBC. The BBC board covers a vast range of different aspects of the BBC’s activities—its strategy, its budget and so on—and there is a case for greater oversight, particularly of...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c45
House
House of Commons

Thank you for calling me, Madam Deputy Speaker:

“Trust is the foundation of the BBC.”

So says its values—except if you are trying to cover up a serial sex offender scandal such as that involving Jimmy Savile, do over a respected journalist such as Carrie Gracie or lie and cheat to get...

Member
Hannah Bardell (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c45
House
House of Commons

The BBC is the British Broadcasting Corporation. It reports on activities across the United Kingdom. It is paid for by every person resident in the United Kingdom who has a television. Impartiality and fairness apply as much in its reporting of domestic politics as they do internationally. There are questions...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c45
House
House of Commons

May I take my right hon. Friend back to the one bit of the Dyson report that has left us with a serious question? It relates to the behaviour of the then chairman and of Mr Bashir. Fraud is defined as a deception intended to result in financial or personal...

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c45
House
House of Commons

The questions surrounding the employment of Martin Bashir are being urgently investigated by the corporation, as I said, and I expect a statement to be made very shortly. On whether any criminal offences have been committed, I understand that a request has gone to the Metropolitan police to examine the...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c46
House
House of Commons

It is clear that shameful journalistic practices took place and that the investigations into them were, at best, profoundly inadequate. Does my right hon. Friend agree not only that the BBC needs to clean up its act in quite a considerable way, but that this lamentable episode should not be...

Member
Damian Green (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c46
House
House of Commons

I entirely share my right hon. Friend’s admiration for the BBC, which at its best is the finest broadcaster in the world. That is what makes these revelations so painful: that an institution that we all admire should be found capable of such appalling failings. I absolutely agree with my...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c46
House
House of Commons

I am sure that many people will have been disgusted by the behaviour of Martin Bashir and those senior figures who failed to address his actions, but does the Secretary of State agree that demands for the present Government to act against today’s BBC over events that occurred more than...

Member
Lord McCabe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c46
House
House of Commons

I am sure that I speak for the Secretary of State in saying that it is not a question of punishing the BBC—particularly for events that happened a long time ago, as the hon. Gentleman says—but it is essential that we learn the lessons from what happened then. As I...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c46
House
House of Commons

Now then: the findings of the Dyson report come as no surprise to many residents in Ashfield who have lost all confidence in the BBC. I personally have ripped up my TV licence, and it will not get another penny from me ever, because in my opinion the once great...

Member
Lee Anderson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c46
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right that one of the great challenges that the BBC faces is to reconnect with the people he represents. There is a widespread feeling that the BBC is too metropolitan-centred and has lost touch with the views of a large part of the

British population;...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
696 c46
House
House of Commons