Skip to main content

1-50 of 499 results for subject:Forgery

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the number of people who have entered the UK illegally using forged (a) passports and (b) visas in the last five years.

Asked by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2025
Reference
75928
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people have been arrested for using forged passports at airports in the last 12 months.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2025
Reference
24171
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
9 February 2023
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the letters from the Chair of the House of Commons Treasury Committee to the Financial Conduct Authority and the National Economic Crime Centre on 15 October 2020, how many banks have been (1) investigated, and (2) prosecuted, for forging customer signatures.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2022
Reference
HL2851
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she expects the National Economic Crime Centre to conclude its investigation into alleged signatory fraud by banks; what steps she is taking to help ensure that the investigation is concluded in a timely way; and if she will make...

Asked by
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 2022
Reference
31749
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the letters from the Chair of the House of Commons Treasury Committee to the Financial Conduct Authority and the National Economic Crime Centre on 15 October 2020, how many banks have been (1) investigated, and (2) prosecuted, for forging customer signatures.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 cc755-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the National Economic Crime Centre continues to assess the material submitted to it in relation to alleged signatory fraud by banks, as well as information obtained following preliminary inquiries to clarify matters with certain members of the public who raised the issue. The National Economic Crime Centre is making a thorough assessment to determine whether there are grounds for a criminal investigation.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c755
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not really satisfied with the Minister’s reply. Banks have forged customers’ signatures and fabricated evidence on an industrial scale in order to repossess people’s homes and businesses. More than 700 crime reports and 26 lever-arch files of evidence have been submitted to the NECC over the last three years and there has still been no action, as the Minister said. I ask him if he will, first, appoint an independent inquiry into this obfuscation and, secondly, meet me and a delegation of the victims to hear their concerns.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c755
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that characterisation of the situation is not entirely fair. The NECC is reviewing the evidence submitted to it by the campaign groups. We cannot comment further at this stage, recognising the NECC’s operational independence.

Once it has finished its review, it will communicate its findings. The noble Lord referred to the 26 lever-arch files; these actually contain 10,000 pages of evidence in seven staggered submissions, the last set of which was delivered in March 2021. This was subsequently referred to the various subject-matter experts at the SFO and the FCA. These are complex matters and they take time.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c755
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the case of Lynch v Cadwallader & Anor in February 2021, the High Court ruled that Aldermore, a bank, cannot enforce a personal guarantee to cover £1.2 million against a businessman because the signature on the document was not his. The court said that it was signed by a “person at the Bank”. Could the Minister explain why this did not trigger any investigation or prosecutions?

Asked by
Baroness Blower (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I cannot; I am not familiar with the case. As I said, we maintain that the NECC should have operational independence, so I am afraid that I cannot enlighten the noble Baroness any further. I neglected to answer the noble Lord’s request for a meeting; there have been a number of meetings with Home Office officials, but I would of course be happy to meet him.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it the case that the Government are on the side of fat-cat bankers rather than customers? Would it not be a good idea to give more resources to the police so that they can actually investigate, prosecute and bring to justice these people?

Asked by
Lord Watts (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad that the noble Lord has raised the subject of resources, because we are giving them: the spending review last year allocated a further £400 million to tackle economic crime over the next three years. This includes £100 million earmarked specifically to target fraud, including by establishing a national fraud policing network, including greater fraud investigative capacity in the NCA, meeting a manifesto commitment to create a new national cybercrime force focused on fraud. In addition, new fraud investigation teams have been piloted in four regional organised crime units, which will be expanded and rolled out across all ROCUs. These new capabilities are driven by a new tasking and co-ordination process run by the NECC. Finally, as part of the police uplift, we are prioritising more investigators for the City of London Police, which leads on this.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister was quite rightly concerned about operational independence in an earlier answer. In that light, is it really appropriate that Lloyds Bank, one of the suspect banks, has directly funded the City of London Police to the tune of £1.5 million since 2019?

Asked by
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness is referring to Action Fraud, which is receiving some funding—but the money is ring-fenced from another source. I cannot find the precise reference to it

now, but I will write to her with the details. However, it is not from Lloyds Bank directly.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c756
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what additional action have the Government taken since the noble Lord, Lord Agnew, resigned, saying that he could no longer defend the Government’s action on fraud?

Asked by
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that was a completely different case, of course. But we are doing a number of things, as the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, will be aware. Some of this is legislative and some of it is to do with the various taskforces and strategies that I highlighted to some extent earlier. A Joint Fraud Taskforce was set up in October 2021.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, lack of prosecution is a theme today. So much crime has moved online; what we have heard about in this Question is an example of how that has happened. Can we increase the resources for the police and prosecution in respect of digital fraud? My own experience of Action Fraud—admittedly some time ago—was that it was absolutely pathetic.

Asked by
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend is right to raise the changing nature of some of these crimes. I am sure that she is partly referring to the UKFI report on fraud, published earlier this week, which showed that some types of fraud are in fact diminishing while others are increasing. A number of actions are being taken: for example, I am sure that noble Lords were surprised to note that the text messages that we used to receive seem to have diminished somewhat, which is partly a response to work done by the telecoms companies. The National Cyber Security Centre has also launched its suspicious email reporting service to remove harmful scams from online. Since April 2020, it has taken down 81,000 scams across 147,000 URLs.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is active concern about not just fraud but money laundering and large-scale bribery—money laundering not only from former socialist states such as Russia but from the Middle East, and bribery also in terms of a number of the Middle East autocracies. This does not seem to be a priority for the Government yet. Is this also where we need a considerable reinforcement of officials who deal with these subjects?

Asked by
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not think it is just about officials; it is also about legislation. Obviously, we passed one Act earlier this year at speed. The noble Lord will be aware that there is another economic crime and corporate transparency Bill on its way which deals with many of the unresolved issues from those debates and that Act.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, yesterday’s Times newspaper reported that money lost to scams had risen by more than £160 million in a year, from £420 million to £583 million, which is a

huge increase. Can the Minister say when we might expect the financial services and markets Bill to come before Parliament and whether that Bill will be directed to tackling fraud?

Asked by
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c757
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I cannot answer that question; I will try to find out and write to the noble Lord.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as one of those who drafted, or helped to draft, the anti-money laundering directives in Brussels—I emphasise that they were directives—I nevertheless have certain concerns about the way in which the Financial Conduct Authority has interpreted them, in particular the parts that offered proportionality in the application of regulation. A lot of small investors have suffered as a result of an overzealousness of the banking institutions sometimes to do things they do not need to do and to inquire in ways they do not need to inquire. Does my noble friend agree that proportionality should be deployed properly by the Financial Conduct Authority?

Asked by
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

I agree with my noble friend. We are straying away from the Home Office brief on this subject. Obviously, the Financial Services Act 2012 established the FCA as the conduct of business regulator for financial services. It has a focused set of objectives to promote effective competition in the interests of consumers, to secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers and to protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system, but I absolutely agree that proportionality has to be a part of that.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I am sure the Minister will know, in May 2019 Dame Elizabeth Gloster was appointed to investigate the collapse of London Capital & Finance and published a damning report in November 2021. Blackmore Bond is also about mini-bonds and poor regulation, yet no investigator has been appointed. Can the Minister explain why this is the case?

Asked by
Lord Woodley (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I have to refer the noble Lord back to my earlier answer about the operational independence of the NECC. I do not know what the evidential situation is. How can I possibly answer the question?

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2022
Reference
823 c758
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
28 February 2022
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress they have made in (1) investigating, and (2) prosecuting, allegations of banks forging customers’ signatures.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2021
Reference
HL4311
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department has made representations to the National Crime Agency on forged bank signatures cases in the last 12 months.

Asked by
Anneliese Dodds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 September 2021
Reference
37571
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many meetings his Department has had with the Bank Signature Forgery Campaign on bank signature forgeries in the last three years.

Asked by
Anneliese Dodds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 September 2021
Reference
38412
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they will take to stop fake positive COVID-19 test results being used to require school pupils to self-isolate.

Asked by
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 2021
Reference
HL2032
House
House of Lords

Madam Deputy Speaker, I notice a slightly raised eyebrow or slightly furrowed brow, because by convention we would not talk about individual peers in a disobliging way. There is an ancient practice for removing peerages, which is by Bill of attainder, but looking at the Clerk at the Table, I...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2021
Reference
696 c575
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the Leader of the House agrees that Lord Hall has very serious questions to answer regarding the re-employment of Mr Martin Bashir at the BBC. Will the Leader of the House let me know whether there is any mechanism that can be deployed, or that has...

Member
Ian Jnr Paisley (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Business questions
Date
27 May 2021
Reference
696 c575
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Government’s review of the BBC’s governance. However, contrary to the noble Lord, Lord Hamilton, I was concerned this morning that the director-general of the BBC said he had no intention of airing the Princess Diana interview ever again. I understand, given the shocking circumstances under which Martin...

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the findings of Lord Dyson’s report into the BBC.

Lead member
Baroness Barran
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 cc901-5
House
House of Lords

It is obviously up to the board of the BBC to determine the scope of the review. I am sure the noble Baroness has seen the letter today from the chief executive

of Ofcom about its work in this area. It is all part of an effort to rebuild trust...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c902
House
House of Lords

We absolutely agree—we want a strong and successful public broadcasting system, and that needs the BBC to be a central part of it. As my right honourable friend the Secretary of State made clear in his recent article in the Times, there will be no knee-jerk reaction.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is absolutely right that the BBC needs urgently to demonstrate that the failings to which he refers have been addressed, that they can never happen again, and that trust is restored in a culture of transparency and accountability within the BBC.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

I do not completely agree with the noble Baroness: I think part of the role of good governance is to check that inbreeding is not happening within an organisation, and that the governance structure reinforces the culture necessary to deliver on the mission of the organisation. In relation to internal

notus-xml...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

I absolutely agree: it is essential that the BBC can operate with editorial independence and integrity, and nothing we are doing will compromise that.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

My noble friend’s first question falls into the area of editorial independence, although I share the very real concerns he raises. On the forgery of the bank statements, as my right honourable friend the Minister for Media and Data set out, my understanding is that a request has gone to...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

I can only repeat what I said earlier, which is that that appears to me to sit as an editorial decision for the BBC.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c904
House
House of Lords

The mid-term review is really a health check point that was built in to the charter review process to look at the effectiveness of governance and regulation, rather than the more widespread suggestions the noble Lord makes.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord raises another troubling example. All of these will be important to address if the BBC is to rebuild the trust we all wish it to have.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is right to question the culture of the BBC. We welcome the fact that the new chair and director-general are doing the same, as my noble friend says, in relation not just to some of the serious failings we have heard about in the Chamber today and...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c905
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the blunt findings of the report by Lord Dyson make for deeply troubling reading, and I welcome the unequivocal apology by the director-general of the BBC and the review into editorial practices and culture. Is the Minister satisfied that the scope of the review will ensure that such...

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c902
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome the fact that the Government agree that, in an era of fake news, public service broadcasting has never been more important. The Bashir story is truly shocking, but I worked as a journalist at the BBC for many years and know that the vast majority abide...

Member
Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the comments made by the ministerial teams in both this House and the other place over the last day or so. I also welcome the announcement by the DCMS Select Committee that it will look at this matter. I therefore call on the BBC to clear...

Member
Lord Hayward (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords

I declare an interest as a former BBC governor. The problem of trust in the BBC today is not, at core, one of governance; it is one of inbreeding. Ofcom is not the solution, for it too has many former BBC employees on its committees. The chances of a complaint...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2021
Reference
812 c903
House
House of Lords