Skip to main content

1-100 of 741 results for subject:Space

Type

-
Early day motions (3)
+ Legislation (2) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (457)
-
Oral answers to questions (19)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (418)
+ Parliamentary committees (86) + Committee proceedings (47)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (43)
-
Select Committee reports (10)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (5)
-
Select Committee written evidence (34)
+ Parliamentary papers (80)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (1)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (19)
-
House of Commons papers (57)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (133) + Debates (55)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (47)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (43)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
+ Legislative debates (4)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (4)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (76) + Oral statements (8)
-
Ministerial statements (8)
-
Written statements (68)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (95) + Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Written questions (76)
+ Research briefings (11)
-
Commons Briefing papers (5)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Topical (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (4)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what recent assessment he has made of the adequacy of the budget allocations made by the Science and Technology Facilities Council in the area of astronomy and space science, and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2026
Reference
26526
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 169 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Foreign Affairs Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 109 2026-27
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to take note of the report of the UK Engagement with Space Committee on The Space Economy: Act Now or Lose Out (HL 190 2024-26). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland
Answering member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Department
UK Engagement with Space Committee; Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc295-318
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is with great pride that I introduce this debate on the report The Space Economy: Act Now or Lose Out. The title was chosen to capture the urgency with which the committee believes government and others should act. I am sure this overarching message will be reinforced...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc295-300
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the committee on an excellent report, which is a magisterial review of the issues in space policy that also brings out the opportunities for us. I declare an interest as chair of SaxaVord spaceport, which has already been referred to. Before that, as chair of the...

Member
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc299-301
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it was a privilege to be a member of the UK Engagement with Space Committee, served so well by its two clerks, Sabrina Asghar and Steph Coulter, and expertly chaired by the noble Baroness, Lady of Ashton of Upholland. I realised that she was going to be a...

Member
Lord Tarassenko (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc301-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton of Upholland, and the whole committee for this extremely enthusiastic report. I suspect I will be taking a different perspective from every other speaker in this debate because I am going to start from down here on solid earth—a planet that...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc303-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Baroness and to participate in this debate, as indeed it was a pleasure to be part of the committee under the superb chairmanship of the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton. We are able to say that, for a sessional committee,...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc304-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to contribute to this debate on the report of the UK Engagement with Space Committee. Before turning to the substance of the report, I pay tribute to our chair, the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton of Upholland, my fellow committee members and our wonderful clerks,...

Member
Baroness Mobarik (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc306-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness and to take part in this debate. I thank my noble friend Lady Ashton for the masterful way she introduced the report; she made every single point that I had jotted down to say myself.

I want to thank all my...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc308-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, by the time you get to your feet and nine people have already spoken, an awful lot of things that you would want to say have already been covered. I repeat again that it was a delight and fun to be on the committee, which was charmingly chaired,...

Member
Lord Shamash (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc309-311
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it was a great pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Shamash, and to serve alongside him and all the other very enthusiastic members of the space committee—and, indeed, to serve under the excellent chairmanship of the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton of Upholland. I congratulate her not just...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc310-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a former member of the committee—all of us, I suppose, could be described as space cadets—I warmly thank the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton of Upholland, for her superb chairing of the committee and for her inspiring introduction today. I join her and other members of the committee...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc312-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too begin by thanking the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton of Upholland, and every member of the committee for this powerful and timely report, although I must say that my principal reaction is one of envy—I rather wish I had been on the committee. The report makes the...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc315-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to respond for the Government. I thank my noble friend Lady Ashton of Upholland for securing this debate and for her committee’s important report on this matter. I also thank the chair for her expert leadership on the very thorough and seemingly enjoyable work that...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 cc317-321
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, at several points in the Government’s response to the Select Committee’s report, they say that more detail will come forward in the “spring space publication”—not my language, the Government’s. The Minister has not said when we might expect to see that important spring space publication.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 c318
House
House of Lords

I set out earlier this year, in a speech to the Space-Comm Expo, a number of elements that are important for taking forward the measures envisaged in the space strategy, which include the £500 million of funding. We have taken action in many other areas set out in that report,...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 c318
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who participated in this debate and my noble friend the Minister for her response. It is clear from everything that has been said that we have real opportunities in economic growth, world leadership and resolving problems, both in space and on earth. It...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 c318
House
House of Lords

On 30 June 2026, the government published its long-awaited Defence Investment Plan. What are the key decisions for MOD spending over the next four years?

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
2 July 2026
Reference
CBP-10935

Lords statement on the defence investment plan.

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1069-1083
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for both the briefing and prior sight of the defence investment plan, which he provided to me and my colleague, the noble Earl, Lord Minto, yesterday. I doubt any plan was so dogged by delay and preceded by such drama as this one, but...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1073-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is clearly a very delayed and extremely underfunded plan. As we have heard, at £15 billion it falls well short of the £28 billion requested by the defence chief to keep our country secure. But we know that it actually falls even shorter than that, as nearly...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1074-6
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Fox, and the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, for their contributions and important questions.

I will start by dealing with the question of spending, which goes to the heart of what both noble Lords were saying. Let me put on record some of the things that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1076-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all European countries are struggling with coming to terms with new realities and what that requires for their defence and equipment to be appropriate to modern warfare. However, irrespective of the money and the percentages spent, if we do not start the national conversation—which we have been talking...

Member
Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1078
House
House of Lords

Indeed, we will come forward with proposals and plans with respect to a national conversation. The noble Baroness is right in her suggestion. We can see—many Members of this House will know this—that some of the ways in which the Government have asked different departments to contribute to this uplift...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1078
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome part of this plan—it obviously has some holes in it, as we have already heard. I also welcome, as I do every time I hear the Minister speak, a great deal of his comments and his profound thinking. However, I wonder today whether the brief he...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1078-9
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his question and his comments, which come from a great knowledge and experience, and I thank him for his remarks about me. Just to reiterate, the GCAP programme is extremely important, and as he just said, that is outlined in the money allocated within...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

First, I welcome this Statement, which this House has been waiting on for some time, and share my concerns about the funding, which I hope will be sorted out under new leadership. However, I welcome the fact that there is an emphasis on innovation and supporting small businesses, and I...

Member
Baroness Foster of Aghadrumsee (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

I cannot give the noble Baroness an assurance about what the Republic will pay for, but let me just say that there has been improved and increasing co-operation between the Republic and ourselves where it is in both our interests to do so. She will know that underwater cables and...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the publication of the defence investment plan and the recognition in it that science, technology and innovation are going to play a very big part in the future. Does my noble friend agree that it is not just a financial challenge that faces the defence investment...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

Indeed, as I said to the noble Baroness, of course we need a conversation to more fully and carefully explain to the public why we need to increase our expenditure on defence and security and, alongside that, to help them to understand why that might mean changed priorities for budgets...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the unfortunate realities is that the United States is moving away from the defence of Europe. Whether we like it or not, this is not just for this Administration; it is a danger that is likely to happen in future as well as the US looks...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

There is a lot in the strategic defence review and the Defence Investment Plan about building up a greater sovereign capability in some of the areas that the noble Lord has addressed. But I think it is important in every debate to say that the alliance between the United States...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I share widely the view that this belated DIP comes nowhere near funding the strategic defence review, but the DIP does make clear the Government’s commitment, together

with Japan and Italy, to the next-generation Global Combat Air Programme. This is welcome news, given the inevitable withdrawal of the...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

The noble and gallant Lord is right to point out the importance of GCAP and how it offers a sixth-generation option for us after 2040, when Typhoon is expected to go out of service. There is money in the defence investment plan for the upgrade of Typhoon to ensure that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I say that this is a disappointment, to put it mildly? I am on the same side as the Minister on this. This, I assume, was what led John Healey to resign—I suspect that it was the same document. Given that, does he think that any other...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

There is an additional £1.5 billion, and there are also some changes with respect to the way in which there is a greater emphasis in this document on autonomy, AI and the transformation of the Armed Forces to have more new types of aircraft, vessels and capabilities. For me, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not clear that this is a welcome step forward, but that it cannot be the end of the story? We have to reaffirm our commitment to 3% by the end of this decade, and 3.5% by the middle of the next decade, as firm commitments of...

Member
Lord Liddle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

In terms of the spending, I have made the point about the 2027 spending review, and that the document lays out that we will come back to the 3% commitment at the 2027 spending review, and,

of course, the 3.5% commitment is laid out in the document as well. That...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Liddle, has just alluded to the elephant in the room, which is that there are no cuts to the £333 billion welfare bill, which would go a long way to helping with additional support for the defence industry. My worry is that most of these cuts...

Member
Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

I do not know about the ambitions for net zero. All I can say to the noble Baroness is that, of course, spending is important, and increasing the amount of spending on defence is important. Whatever decisions are made will require the reprioritisation of budgets for what the Government plan...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was head of the Treasury’s defence division, and I welcome all this concentration on the money, but the document is actually about investment and where the money is to be spent. Ukraine is making, using, and losing 7 million drones a year. The life cycle of any...

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

I agree with that. In the document, it talks about the need for the transformation of our Armed Forces, and much of that will be around uncrewed capabilities and drones. It is not only about big primes; much of this, including in Ukraine as the example, is delivered by small...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the honourable exception of the noble Lord, Lord Kerr, much of our debate today, as in the many months leading up to the defence investment plan, has focused on the bottom line and where the money is coming from; we have, unfortunately, had far less debate about...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

“No” is the answer to the noble Baroness’s question. Homeland defence runs all the way through the document: how we have better air defence, what we do about improving the use of reserves, and various protections for our critical national infrastructure, which is really important. As I have said before,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1083
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I put it to the Minister that it would have been better to have had the conversation with the public before we put out the policy, so that we had rolled the pitch and people understood the nature of the threat. I welcome, therefore, what he is saying...

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1083
House
House of Lords

The catastrophic decision to pick out of what my noble friend said—given the importance that I, the Government and Members across this House attach to this—was the delay in 2010 for a number of years in renewing the nuclear deterrent. That was a really bad decision, and as a result...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1083
House
House of Lords

What steps her Department is taking to maintain levels of funding for astronomy and space science.

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat; Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
900736; 788 cc893-4
House
House of Commons

I draw the House’s attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. I am proud that this Labour Government have committed a record £86 billion towards R&D, including on astronomy, space science and others, to supercharge innovation. Within that, UK Research and Innovation’s Science and Technology Facilities Council—the main funder of particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics—has a stable budget with increasing investment in research areas that lead to and underpin discovery.

Answered by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c893
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his answer. My Oxfordshire constituency is home to Harwell campus, the UK’s largest concentration of space and science organisations. Despite what the Minister said about the budget, the need for £162 million of savings by 2030 that was imposed on the Science and Technology Facilities Council risks jobs and critical research equipment, undermining our global science leadership. Does the Minister share those concerns, and what steps will he take to protect scientific jobs and facilities?

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to the hon. Gentleman and everyone at the Harwell campus, which hosts over £1 billion of world-leading research infrastructure. A lot of concerns have been raised by the physics community about this issue. I can confirm that funding for STFC has not been cut. UKRI has decided that STFC’s core budget should be maintained over the spending review period. Of course, we understand the cost pressures through inflation, foreign exchange and the ambitious commitments that were made from the previous spending review. No final decisions are being made, but STFC is working through that with the community.

Answered by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

Particle physics and astronomy have had a rough deal since the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council—PPARC—was abolished about 19 years ago. I understand that the justification being put out by the Science Minister and other Ministers is that there has been a change to mission-driven research as opposed to fundamental blue-skies research. This is a mistake: most practical applications of science have come from scientists asking fundamental questions that had no relevance at the time. Does the Minister agree that the policy is a mistake?

Asked by
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

I do not agree with my hon. Friend about the policy. We are putting £86 billion into research and development, including astronomy and space science, including a record £38 billion for UK Research and Innovation. Of that, £14.5 billion is for curiosity-driven research because we know that there is no route to stronger growth in this country than through significant investment in science, innovation and tech.

Answered by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to retain specialist staff in the space research and development sector.

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
9293
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the impact of previous research grant cuts on UK space research and development.

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
9294
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential long-term impact of the funding cuts of £162 million proposed by the Science and Technology Facilities Council on the astronomy and space science sectors.

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
9292
House
House of Commons

What steps her Department is taking to maintain levels of funding for astronomy and space science.

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2026
Reference
900057
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Date
19 May 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to ensure continued funding for astronomical and space science research.

Asked by
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
126553
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to support research into astronomy and space science.

Asked by
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
126046
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact on research for astronomy and space science of the Science and Technology Facilities Council’s proposed funding cuts of up to 60%.

Asked by
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
126045
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions she has had with the Science and Technology Facilities Council regarding their proposed funding cuts for astronomy and space science.

Asked by
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
126044
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
International Relations and Defence Committee
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
HL 290 2024-26
House
House of Lords

A Westminster Hall debate has been scheduled for 4.30pm on 14 April on Alternatives to ground mounted solar panels. The debate will be opened by Lincoln Jopp MP.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
10 April 2026
Reference
CBP-10610

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions she has had with the Science and Technology Facilities Council on proposed reductions to funding for astronomy and space science; and what assessment she has made of the potential impact of such reductions on (a) the UK’s...

Asked by
Zöe Franklin (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 March 2026
Reference
123095
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether she has considered which aspects of (a) AI, (b) quantum, (c) space and (d) bioengineering the UK will seek to lead in.

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
122097
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
HC 838 2024-26
House
House of Commons

My Lords, at the request of my noble friend Lord Stansgate, and with his permission, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in his name on the Order Paper.

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c265
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the space economy is a top priority for the Government, who have announced a £2.8 billion investment over the spending review for the UK Space Agency, including a £1.7 billion commitment at the last European Space Agency Ministerial Council. We are strategically investing to support sector growth through a new outcomes-based, targeted approach. Through a one-government philosophy, we will grow the space economy by focusing investment on enabling businesses to commercialise and scale.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c265
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend the Minister for that reply. Given that, in the space inquiry we conducted, The Space Economy: Act Now or Lose Out, we identified that the space sector is worth £18.6 billion to the economy, employs 55,000 people and is growing a rate of about 6% a year, can she tell us more about the priorities across government, as space impinges on every aspect of our lives?

Asked by
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c265
House
House of Lords

I share the enthusiasm of my noble friend, the committee and the report for the space economy. We responded in detail to the recommendations earlier this year. We are setting out our strategic priorities, which, as the committee and my noble friend highlighted, encompassed many aspects of our lives, including defence, economic growth and support for our farming communities. We will continue to focus our spend on the priorities of economic growth and national security outcomes.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c265
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on the Government’s space plan, will they formally adopt a policy of space debris neutrality, requiring all satellites launched from the UK to have what is called a “designed to demise” commitment to prevent further orbital congestion? With an active debris removal procurement

worth some £75 million, how are the Government ensuring that UK-based SMEs are not being edged out by larger international companies for these critical domestic contracts?

Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c265
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises the important issue of space debris, which creates risks to our critical national infrastructure. We are strengthening UK space surveillance and investing in debris mitigation technologies. We are seen as a leader in space sustainability, including with the international community and His Majesty the King. We are supporting important UK companies such as Astroscale to understand the risks and costs of active debris removal. In fact, there are further announcements today on this important issue of space debris removal.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c266
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister agree that space still lacks an effective and enforceable legal framework, including liability for the space junk that has just been referred to, which is continuously being fly-tipped in space and is now blighting the few usable orbits around our planet? If so, what are HMG doing to ensure that UK expertise in law and in insurance play leading roles in making space a less lawless frontier?

Asked by
Lord Cromwell (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c266
House
House of Lords

The UK has a great deal of expertise on space, including on regulatory issues. We continue to collaborate internationally— for example, at the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space—to shape and uphold standards, regulations, norms and agreements on best practices to define the in-orbit regime across the globe.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c266
House
House of Lords

The first vertical-launch spaceport to receive planning consent was at Sutherland, in the far north of Scotland. However, Orbex, the private entity in the equation, suspended construction of Sutherland’s spaceport in December 2024, with only six months to go until the infrastructure would have been completed. Given the announcement of £1.5 billion in funding for national space programmes, what progress has now been made towards supporting the completion of the spaceport, which has already attracted interest from a number of potential launch providers? At a time when sovereign launch capability is becoming increasingly important, this infrastructure is vital not only for job creation and regional regeneration but for strengthening the UK’s space and defence capabilities. Would the Minister be willing to meet with me and key stakeholders to discuss how this project might be taken forward and how the Government can support its timely delivery?

Asked by
Baroness Mobarik (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c266
House
House of Lords

As I set out in my speech last week, assured access to space is one of the four priorities of the Government’s space policy. As I also set out then, we are pursuing our ambition of assured access to space. Last week, I announced a further £20 million of investment over the spending review to accelerate launch from Scotland. I will be working with industry and international partners to ensure that the UK has assured launch options.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c266
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is my noble friend the Minister aware of the space department at Northumbria University? If not, would she accept an invitation to visit it and see its extraordinary, cutting-edge research?

Asked by
Lord Lennie (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c267
House
House of Lords

Absolutely. One of the great pleasures of covering civil space is the enormity of expertise in our universities and companies. Almost everybody you meet is doing something ground-breaking and impressive. I would be very happy to meet the people suggested by my noble friend.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c267
House
House of Lords

My Lords, events in Ukraine and Iran are showing the growing military defence importance of satellite communication, navigation and earth observation systems. Given our strengths here in the UK in satellite manufacture and space data services, does the Minister agree that the UK space sector is particularly well suited to dual-use applications that support both economic growth and defensive capability? If so, is now the moment for the Government to look for further ways to promote investment in our satellite manufacturing sector?

Asked by
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c267
House
House of Lords

The noble Viscount makes an important point. The two priorities of our space policy are economic growth and national security; they are priorities for the whole of government and are central to our approach to space. I co-chair the Space Ministerial Forum with my colleague from the Ministry of Defence, bringing that whole-of-government approach to this important issue. In the speech I made last week on our four priorities, satellite communication was one of them; it is a real priority for the Government.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c267
House
House of Lords

My Lords, following on from the previous question, there is a clear and urgent strategic demand for a robust, Europe-based polar satellite constellation. This is an area where the UK should be taking a lead, but at the moment it is not. This requires urgent action and sufficient investment. Will the Government undertake to give this area a real boost?

Asked by
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c267
House
House of Lords

I very much agree with the noble and gallant Lord that the UK’s geography can provide particular advantages to the whole of Europe and to NATO. We are very committed to supporting the development of spaceports. Last week, I announced a further £20 million to support the development of spaceports in Scotland, so that is something we are pursuing with vigour.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c267
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support what my noble friend said about SaxaVord. I was very pleased to consent to the CAA’s regulatory approval when I was the Transport Secretary. I want to press the Minister a little more on the market size that will potentially be available to the UK with that vertical launch capability at SaxaVord. What specific steps will the Government take to ensure that we have that capability in the years to come?

Asked by
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c267
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes two important points. On the regulatory framework, the CAA has been doing some excellent work in supporting the development of a space regime that allows the UK to be a very attractive place for all sorts of space activity, including launch. The space indemnities Act is supportive of that, so I do agree with the noble Lord. As I mentioned, the £20 million that I announced last week was to accelerate the development of spaceports in Scotland for vertical launch.

Answered by
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 c268
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Viscount Stansgate

To ask His Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to support the UK space economy.

Asked by
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Notes
Question asked by Baroness Ashton of Upholland on behalf of Viscount Stansgate
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
854 cc265-8
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of the level of funding for astronomy and space science.

Asked by
Dan Carden (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 March 2026
Reference
114275
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Kanishka Narayan
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); Command papers
Date
30 January 2026
Reference
CP 1478
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Date
27 January 2026
Reference
HC 838 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he has had discussions with the Secretary of State for Education on the establishment of a Space Skills Taskforce.

Asked by
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2026
Reference
91788
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
7 January 2026
Reference
HC 671 2024-26
House
House of Commons

I am making this statement to bring to the House’s attention the following Machinery of Government change.

I am today announcing that overarching policy and response responsibilities for Severe Space Weather will move from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. The...

Member
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Department
Prime Minister
Type
Written statements
Date
17 December 2025
Reference
HCWS1200
House
House of Commons

My Rt Hon Friend the Prime Minister has made the following statement:

I am making this statement to bring to the House’s attention the following Machinery of Government change.

I am today announcing that overarching policy and response responsibilities for Severe Space Weather will move from the Department for Energy Security and...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Department
Leader of the House of Lords
Type
Written statements
Date
17 December 2025
Reference
HLWS1199
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 28 November 2025 to Question 93242 on Military Alliances: Space, what is included under the banner of space services.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
97017
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
HC 1071 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, if the Prime Minister will appoint a space minister in the Ministry of Defence to lead cross-government space policy.

Asked by
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 December 2025
Reference
93497
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the full scope of Operation Olympic Defender.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2025
Reference
93242
House
House of Commons