Skip to main content

1-50 of 480 results for subject:X-rays

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the causes of delays in issuing Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry results within NHS trusts in England.

Asked by
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
12554
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of delayed Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry scan results on timely diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Asked by
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
12556
House
House of Commons

That this House celebrates Adaptix securing CE certification for its Adaptix Ortho350 product; acknowledges the company's commitment to innovation in the medical imaging field; recognises the impact their product could have on increasing efficiency of extremity medical imaging; notes the product's capacity to deliver fast, low-dose, high resolution 3D X-ray...

Primary sponsor
Scott Arthur (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
20 May 2026
Reference
167
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to improve X-ray technology through the use of artificial intelligence within NHS services in Surrey Heath constituency.

Asked by
Al Pinkerton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 2025
Reference
82578
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what formal arrangements exist between (a) the Home Office, (b) the NHS and (c) Braintree Community Hospital for (i) scanning and (ii) x-rays of asylum seekers at Wethersfield Airbase.

Asked by
James Cleverly (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2025
Reference
83808
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Andrew Western
Answering member
Laura Farris
Department
Home Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc623-630
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege to have secured this Adjournment debate on age-disputed refugee children. I should declare at the outset that I am an officer of the all-party parliamentary group on refugees.

I know the Minister will agree that there are few issues more important than the safety of children, but...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc624-6
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Stretford and Urmston (Andrew Western) for securing this debate and for the sensitive way he presented these issues. Fairness and decency should indeed sit at the heart of our immigration and asylum system, particularly when it involves children. It might be helpful if I...

Member
Laura Farris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc626-7
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister explain why the committee has encouraged the Government to abandon scientific methods of age assessment?

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 c627
House
House of Commons

Let me gently repeat that we are not going to do that. We are one of the only European countries that do not employ any scientific methods, and we are working towards the implementation of that. I think I gave a fair caveat by accepting that there is no single...

Member
Laura Farris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc627-9
House
House of Commons

The Minister is being incredibly generous in giving way again. To further the attempts at accuracy, may I press her on the point I made about further monitoring of those whose claim of being a child is rejected at the border? At the moment, we have

no data showing how...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 c629
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman would be willing to write to the immigration Minister—I have tried to think about which of the two it would apply to, but I will get my office to clarify that—I will, of course, relay what has happened in this debate and ask them to reply...

Member
Laura Farris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 c630
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are considering using the new screening technology, developed by OsteoSight, for estimating bone mineral density from routine X-rays that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States to give earlier diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Asked by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 2024
Reference
HL2250
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Amendment to regret agreed to on division (165 to 86). Original motion, as amended, agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Notes
Debated with motion to approve the Immigration (Age Assessments) Regulations 2023.
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc960-983
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for attending this debate. The first of these instruments, the Justification Decision (Scientific Age Imaging) Regulations 2023, sets out the affirmative decision made by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice on the Home Office’s application to use ionising radiation, also...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc960-3
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Brinton

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c963
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have laid a regret amendment to both the Motion on the Justification Decision (Scientific Age Imaging) Regulations and the Motion on the Immigration (Age Assessment) Regulations. I did not do this lightly but believe that the Government are contradicting themselves in moving ahead with legislation that medical...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc963-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for tabling her regret Motion, which sets out so well why these regulations should be withdrawn. Having challenged the proposals to use X-rays in the sensitive matter of

age assessment in both recent immigration Bills in the early...

Member
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc965-8
House
House of Lords

I know the convention of the House is that I should say it is a pleasure to follow two such brilliant speeches from the noble Baronesses, Lady Brinton and Lady Lister, but it is not actually a pleasure—it is intimidating; one fears the contrast. Mine will be an amateur contribution...

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc967-970
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in strong support of the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and the others who have already spoken in this debate, I would argue that this is primarily a matter of science. On the idea that this is a scientific assessment, it is not. We are using instruments developed by...

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc969-971
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I follow all the previous speakers, including that consummate professional, the noble Lord, Lord Kerr of Kinlochard. I have some similar questions for the Minister. I will try to edit as I go so as not to be too repetitive.

I started by wondering whether the Home Office could...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc971-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I promise that I will be brief. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for moving this regret amendment and thank all those who have spoken so far and so well. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Winston, for pointing out that this is not science; it is...

Member
Bishop of London (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c974
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c974
House
House of Lords

Minister!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c974
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c974
House
House of Lords

Oh!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c974
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Minister has not risen, I first declare my interest as the chair of the General Dental Council. I want to make two very brief points, which I do not think have been addressed by the discussion so far. First, the question has to be answered on...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c974
House
House of Lords

Radiologists.

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c975
House
House of Lords

Radiologists should be properly registered. Will that be carried out by people who are professionally registered? If they are professionally registered, are they carrying this out as part of their profession or as an agent of the Home Office? If they are carrying it out on behalf of somebody else,...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c975
House
House of Lords

Front Bench.

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c975
House
House of Lords

I will raise one point which has not been raised. This Chamber should not be legislating when legislation is not required, and the Government have not set out what the problem is and what the statutory instrument will solve. The Minister was very clear in describing the number of unaccompanied...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c975
House
House of Lords

My Lords, some things have been spoken of in this debate, but what is absolutely clear is that in every element the Government have provided more and more uncertainty. We have before

us a set of regulations which are clearly down to a Government seeing themselves in a hurry to...

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc975-6
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Lord can explain why scientific methods are used to assess age in, among other countries, Sweden, Norway, Finland, France, Germany and the Netherlands.

Member
Lord Murray of Blidworth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c976
House
House of Lords

The information provided by the Council of Europe, which of course does not reflect the notifications we have received from the Government, describes the legal cases which have been taken against the proposals made by some of those states and which have in fact been found to be in contravention...

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c976
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will discard most of my speech because all the points I was going to make have been made articulately. We will support the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, if she chooses to test the opinion of the House and I thank her for the thoroughness with which she...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc976-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their contributions to this interesting and insightful debate. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for her regret amendment, which I will obviously refute, because the introduction of scientific methods of age assessment is an innovative approach for the UK. It is...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc977-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister has repeated a statement he made in his introduction about it being only the clear-cut cases. Can he explain how, in the year to August, in just one city—Leeds—30 children arrived, having been assessed as adults by the Home Office on initial arrival, and were immediately...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c979
House
House of Lords

I am not familiar with the case that the noble Baroness refers to, so I am afraid I will have to look into it.

Individuals will be assessed for their fitness to undergo scientific age assessment, which will include consideration of both mental and physical health. The individual will not undergo...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc979-980
House
House of Lords

I am rather surprised that the Minister has repeated the bits of the Home Office written evidence that struck me as a bit odd. The clue, surely, to the timing of an impact assessment is in the name: impact. It should be there at the start. We are not terribly...

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c980
House
House of Lords

I take the noble Lord’s point; obviously, I will take it back to the Home Office and make sure that it is well understood.

On the use of X-rays, I remind the House that the Ministry of Justice has determined the practice is justified under the Justification of Practices Involving Ionising...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc980-1
House
House of Lords

The word “benefits” applies to the subject who is being X-rayed, does it not? Can the Minister tell us what the benefits to that subject are because it does not apply otherwise?

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c981
House
House of Lords

I am coming on to some more of the noble Lord’s more detailed questions; I will endeavour to answer that question in a second.

The Ministry of Justice has undertaken a detailed consideration process to ensure that the use of X-rays is proportionate and justified. The noble Lord asked how we...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc981-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response. Unfortunately, I fear that many of the questions we asked across the House were not responded to. I heard very clearly that this has been designed as an innovative approach to discourage applicants but I also heard a lot of “We...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c983
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on division (9 to 1).

Lead member
Edward Argar
Answering member
Ruth Cadbury
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
20 November 2023
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on division (9 to 1).

Lead member
Robert Jenrick
Answering member
Stephen Kinnock
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
20 November 2023
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
HL 263 2022-23
House
House of Lords
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
14 September 2023
Reference
SI 2024/19; 2023/
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Alex Chalk
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
13 September 2023
Reference
SI 2024/22; 2023/
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the ethical considerations of the use of X-rays to determine the age of child refugees seeking asylum in the United Kingdom.

Asked by
Baroness Prashar (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2022
Reference
826 cc85-8
House
House of Lords

The Home Office Chief Scientific Adviser convened an independent age estimation science advisory committee to provide the department with independent advice on the ethics and implementation of different scientific approaches to age assessment. No official decisions have been made on the use of scientific methods, and the use of X-rays specifically would need to be independently justified and approved under the Justification of Practices Involving Ionising Radiation Regulations 2004.

Answered by
Lord Murray of Blidworth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 December 2022
Reference
826 c85
House
House of Lords