Skip to main content

901-1000 of 73,142 results for subject:Protection

Type

-
Early day motions (127)
+ Legislation (803) + Acts (51)
-
Public acts (51)
+ Bills (215) + Public bills (215)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (37)
+ Private members' bills (177)
-
Ballot bills (33)
-
Presentation bills (46)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (25)
-
Ten minute rule bills (73)
-
Church of England measures (2)
+ Delegated legislation (535) + Statutory instruments (535)
-
Public body orders (2)
+ Members' contributions (57,749)
-
Business questions (219)
-
Maiden speeches (61)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,974)
-
Oral corrections (1)
-
Oral question time interventions (40)
+ Oral questions (2,066)
-
Prime Minister's questions (83)
-
Topical questions (108)
-
Points of order (20)
-
Proceeding contributions (53,664)
+ Parliamentary committees (1,383) + Committee proceedings (831)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (14)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (120)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (108)
-
European Committee proceedings (26)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (343)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (146)
-
Select Committee reports (256)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (120)
-
Select Committee written evidence (198)
+ Parliamentary papers (2,894)
-
Annual reports (48)
-
Command papers (259)
-
Consultation papers (376)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (46)
-
Deposited papers (1,657)
-
House of Commons papers (670)
-
House of Lords papers (73)
-
Impact assessments (181)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (6)
-
Transport and Works Act order applications (2)
-
Treaties (129)
-
Unprinted command papers (7)
-
Unprinted papers (110)
-
White papers (14)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (3,355) + Debates (2,099)
-
Adjournment debates (217)
-
Backbench debates (46)
+ Committee proceedings (831)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (14)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (120)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (108)
-
European Committee proceedings (26)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (343)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (146)
-
Debates on select committee reports (27)
-
Debates on treaties (1)
-
e-petition debates (13)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
-
Estimates days (2)
+ Legislative debates (1,401)
-
Debates on bills (1,140)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (261)
+ Monarch's speech debates (12)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (11)
-
Opposition days (15)
-
Questions for short debate (56)
+ Formal proceedings (14)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (9)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (5)
+ Petitions and observations (32)
-
Observations on petitions (14)
-
Paper petitions (18)
-
Private notice questions (9)
+ Statements (1,124) + Oral statements (189)
-
Business statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (178)
-
Select Committee statements (7)
-
Speaker's statements (2)
-
Written statements (935)
-
Urgent questions (27)
+ Written corrections (16)
-
Ministerial corrections (16)
+ Parliamentary questions (10,198)
-
Business questions (219)
+ Oral questions (2,066)
-
Prime Minister's questions (83)
-
Topical questions (108)
-
Private notice questions (9)
-
Urgent questions (27)
-
Written questions (7,877)
+ Petitions and observations (32)
-
Observations on petitions (14)
-
Paper petitions (18)
+ Research briefings (351) + Commons Briefing papers (226)
-
Briefing papers on bills (40)
-
Constituency casework (4)
-
Commons Debate packs (71)
+ Lords Briefing packs (2)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (2)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (41)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (27)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (10)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (4)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (9)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A child cannot unsee a sexualised image online. I raised with the former Secretary of State parents’ concerns regarding highly sexualised images popping up in children’s games online. Will today’s announcement cover in-game adverts, or is that a loophole that the new Secretary of State can commit to looking at?

Member
Carla Lockhart (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c929
House
House of Commons

I certainly commit to looking at that issue. I am concerned by what the hon. Lady said. I will take that away and make sure that we take the appropriate action to protect children from those sorts of images.

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c929
House
House of Commons

Like parents and grandparents in Hartlepool, I find it incredible that technology companies even had to be asked to put software in place that protected against child sexual abuse. Having been asked, they apparently have said no. As the Secretary of State rightly points out, there will be further loopholes...

Member
Jonathan Brash (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c930
House
House of Commons

I support what my hon. Friend says. We need to stop thinking about the online world as somehow distinct from the offline world. As someone who worked with children and young people for many years before I came into Parliament, I know that there are systems and protections in place...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c930
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State is right to push the tech companies to live up to their responsibilities to keep children safe. One of the many horrifying things when considering online safety is the number of abuse perpetrators who themselves are children. We have had a case in my local area...

Member
Lisa Smart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c930
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady raises an important point about some of the apps that exist. I commend my right hon. Friend the Member for Leicester West (Liz Kendall) for taking such quick and decisive action in this place on Grok. The hon. Lady is right to say that other forms of...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c930
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Secretary of State’s statement and the work done by my right hon. Friend the Member for Leicester West (Liz Kendall) to finally take back control of our children’s safety online. Tackling misinformation and disinformation is also a part of creating safe online spaces. I have been leading,...

Member
Sarah Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c930
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to my hon. Friend and her constituent for their campaign. I would be very happy to offer a meeting with the relevant officials and to discuss this issue personally with her. She is absolutely right to highlight the importance of tackling misinformation and disinformation. She will know...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c931
House
House of Commons

I welcome the statement by the Secretary of State, the work she is doing and the work begun by the hon. Member for Birmingham Yardley (Jess Phillips). Protecting our children is very important. My query relates to the allegedly robust complaints procedure provided by social media apps. For example, a...

Member
Ayoub Khan (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c931
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman gives an astonishing example. I am very happy to pick that up with the social media companies directly.

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c931
House
House of Commons

I echo the comments of my hon. Friend the Member for Hyndburn (Sarah Smith) on misinformation and disinformation. We know that hostile states around the world, from Russia to Iran, are actively using social media disinformation as a tool as part of their forward defence strategy to disrupt democracies and...

Member
Luke Myer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c931
House
House of Commons

We are coming at that from a number of angles. As well as the measures I have been outlining to colleagues today, we are looking at how we can develop gov.uk. We are pioneers when it comes to gov.uk, but we believe we could do even more to make it...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c931
House
House of Commons

I join the House in welcoming the statement and thank the Government for the steps they are taking to keep our children safe. Earlier this year, I met campaigners from SafeToNet who had invented hardware-level protection that they had installed on HTC-only devices and were trying to persuade other mobile...

Member
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to raise the issue of enforcement. As has already been mentioned, any legislation that we introduce is only as good as our ability to enforce it, so we take that extremely seriously.

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

As the youngest parent in this place, I warmly welcome the Secretary of State’s leadership and that of our Prime Minister. Will she look at AI-enabled smart glasses, which could be filming our children, and the content from them that is being put online? Will she also look at loopholes...

Member
Luke Charters (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

I have already discussed issues around VPNs with officials; device-level controls are one part of the answer but not the whole answer, so my hon. Friend is right to raise the issue. I will take up the issue of smart glasses as well.

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

When I speak to parents in Bracknell Forest, they tell me of their anxiety about what their young people might be exposed to online and their feeling of powerlessness—they do not feel that they have the tools to do anything about it. Today’s statement makes it clear that this Government...

Member
Peter Swallow (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

I support my hon. Friend in saying that it is the responsibility of all of us to keep children safe, and we would like to see the tech companies do more—and more quickly. Today’s statement also shows that the Government can do things to improve people’s lives. We are not...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

I welcome the announcement from the Secretary of State, but the focus is too often on what young people are doing, rather than on the adults who are grooming and coercing them. Can the Secretary of State say more about the work that her Department and others are doing with...

Member
Amanda Martin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

I saw my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham Yardley (Jess Phillips) nodding vigorously at that point. My hon. Friend the Member for Portsmouth North (Amanda Martin) is absolutely right, and I am working closely with the Home Secretary to ensure that we come at the issue from every angle...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c932
House
House of Commons

I strongly welcome the statement from the Secretary of State. It is long overdue and builds on great work by her predecessors. Unfortunately, we do not have full sovereign capability in developing our own tech in this country, and we are vulnerable to politics in other countries. Will the Secretary...

Member
Kevin McKenna (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c933
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend raises two linked and important points. First, we are the Government of the United Kingdom and are responsible to the people of this country. Although we have close friends and allies all over the world, we reserve the right to take our own view on technology. Particularly...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c933
House
House of Commons

I thank and commend the Secretary of State for the Government’s world-leading action. Does she agree that at some point in the future, we are going to look back and wonder how we let the tech companies get away with hijacking our children’s attention and safety for so long? She...

Member
Darren Paffey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c933
House
House of Commons

I think we have been living through a revolution in the way we interact with one another and with Government, compared with when I was growing up. I am going to sound incredibly old now, but I think I was 17 before I got my first email address, and Google...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c933
House
House of Commons

This is a really tremendous statement—I welcome it, and congratulate and thank my right hon. Friend for it. We have touched on the tech companies. Sadly, we can expect them to push back, and they may get support on the other side of the Atlantic. I encourage my right hon....

Member
Ben Coleman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c934
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. As a rule, I think this Government have taken that approach; we want to have a much closer relationship with our closest friends and neighbours across Europe and to repair some of the needless damage that was done to that relationship under previous Governments....

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c934
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Secretary of State’s statement. Unfortunately, young people and their parents in my constituency do not believe that the big tech companies are taking their responsibilities seriously. I speak to young people in schools across Harlow who are concerned that it is very easy to flout the age...

Member
Chris Vince (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c934
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that point. I think the views of his constituents in Harlow are probably mirrored in every constituency across the country. I want to be really clear about our message today to parents who have been struggling with this matter for so long: you are...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c934
House
House of Commons

Democracies face a choice between allowing the online world to be a wild west or stepping in, so I really welcome this Government’s decision to regulate the tech titans that have been putting profit before protection. I have families in my constituency who have been deeply affected by traumas online...

Member
Tom Hayes (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c934
House
House of Commons

Yes, of course; it would be a privilege to meet them. I have had the honour of getting to know some of these families—both bereaved families and families of survivors whose children have been harmed because of the lack of action in this space—and I gave them a commitment that...

Member
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
790 c934
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
HC 622 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Education Committee
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
HC 644 2026-27
House
House of Commons

The Social Housing Bill [HL] 2026-27 is scheduled to have its second reading in the House of Commons on 10 September 2026.

Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
CBP-12182

The Civil Aviation Bill is going through Parliament. It gives more powers to the Civil Aviation Authority and modernises the UK's aviation regulatory framework

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
CBP-12183
Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Presentation bills
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
Bill 140 2026-27
House
House of Commons

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 5 disagreed to on division (76 to 164). Amendment 10 agreed to on division (246 to 165). Amendment 11 disagreed to on division (69 to 171). Amendment 12 agreed to. Amendment 14 disagreed to on division (59 to 144). (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Pitt-Watson
Answering member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe; Lord Altrincham
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland and Scottish legislative consent sought.
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc453-504
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Neville-Rolfe

1: Leave out Clause 1

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, along with another in the name of Baroness Neville-Rolfe, seeks to allow for a debate on the Government’s intentions around a new regime to be laid down in the regulatory rule book in place of that established by the Consumer...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c454
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am honoured to open our discussions on Report on the Financial Services and Markets Bill, which we support in general but seek to improve. I congratulate the Minister on his new position and thank him for his engagement. I also thank the noble Lord, Lord Stockwood, whom...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc454-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to my non-diminution Amendments 2 and 3, and to Amendments 4 and 5, which stem from them. In Committee, the Government made it clear that they wish to remove tail risk for firms—a theme running through the changes to the CCA and FOS. I agree...

Member
Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc455-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 5 in this group. Structurally, the amendment follows the approach used by my noble friend Lady Bowles in her previous amendment, and I am very grateful to her for the help and support in drafting. My amendment

has a simple purpose, which is...

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc456-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 2 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Bowles of Berkhamsted, to which I have added my name. As we have already heard, this amendment would ensure that, when provisions of the Consumer Credit Act are repealed or replaced by FCA rules, the overall...

Member
Bishop of Manchester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc458-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendments in this group, and I feel that this Bill has an opportunity to improve—or at least not diminish—the protections that are offered to consumers of financial services. We have long known that from a consumer perspective, the asymmetry of information and the asymmetry of...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c459
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be extremely brief because my Bench has just spoken very clearly on this issue. I share with the Conservative Front Bench concerns about accountability with a further removal of powers directly into the hands of the regulator, and had they pressed their Amendment 1, we would...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc459-460
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a privilege to be here today to debate the Financial Services and Markets Bill. I put on record my thanks to my noble friend Lord Stockwood for leading the earlier stages of this debate and thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate in...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc460-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister for his response and his detailed explanation of how Clause 1 is framed. I am also grateful to the other noble Lords who have contributed to the debate—the noble Baronesses, Lady Bowles and Lady Altmann, and the right reverend Prelate the...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c463
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharkey

5: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Protection of consumers where regulated credit agreements or regulated mortgage contracts are transferred to inactive lenders

(1) This section applies where rights under any regulated credit agreement or regulated mortgage contract are assigned, sold, securitised or otherwise transferred to a person...

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c463
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had hoped that the life-crippling injustice visited on mortgage prisoners by government would produce a more sympathetic approach. In fact, it is hard to tell what approach, if any, the Government are proposing. What are they proposing to do about this long-standing and obvious injustice? Let me...

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc463-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kramer

7: Clause 3, page 2, line 4, at end insert—

“(2A) Regulations may only make provision arising directly from the review carried out under subsection (2).”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would restrict the scope of the regulations so that they may only implement matters that have been reviewed and consulted...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c468
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it was exceedingly remiss of me, when I spoke earlier, not to welcome the noble Lord, Lord Pitt-Watson, to his role. We have had so many conversations that I have begun to think of him as the established Minister, yet sitting just a few Benches away is the...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc468-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as this is the first time I am speaking on Report, I should remind the House of my interests as a shareholder in Fidelity National Information Services Inc, which provides services to the financial sector, and as a non-practising member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc469-470
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to support Amendment 8, but no one seems to have spoken to it, so is it in order for me to say a few words on it? It is an important amendment because it contains really the only mention in the whole Bill of post offices....

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc470-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness. As this is the first time I have spoken on Report, I declare my technology interests as set out in the register, as adviser to the Crown Estate and Simmons and Simmons LLP and as non-executive director at Avalanche...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c471
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to support Amendment 10 from the noble Baroness, Lady Neville-Rolfe, to add a few of my own concerns on Clause 3 and to support the remarks made earlier on this matter by the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, and the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer.

Protecting customer access...

Member
Lord Massey of Hampstead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc471-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also support the amendments in this group. I believe that the description of these extremely wide powers should, in itself, alert the House to the dangers that Clause 3 of the Bill could pose. I believe that it is important for the Government to understand, for example,...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c472
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support my noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe’s amendment, which would leave out Clause 3. I very much agree with the noble, Lord Vaux, and other noble Lords who have spoken.

I support these amendments on constitutional grounds, because of the importance of the separation of powers and the role...

Member
Baroness Lawlor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc472-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will say a couple of words on Amendment 10 in the name of my noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe, which I fully support. The phrase:

“The Treasury may by regulations make such provision as they consider appropriate in connection with providing access to banking services”,

is not just wide; it...

Member
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc473-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey, and my noble friends Lord Holmes and Lord Mackinlay, for reminding us of the value of post offices and the importance of banking hubs, especially in this ever-expanding digital world. There are serious issues here across the country.

I will speak to...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc474-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am hearing two arguments here: a strong consensus across the House for the need for access to banking and for the appropriate actions to be taken to make sure that that takes place; and a concern, also raised in Committee, about the breadth of the power, particularly...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc475-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given that the Conservative Front Bench have expressed their interest in moving Amendment 10, I will withdraw Amendment 7.

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c476
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Neville-Rolfe

10: Leave out Clause 3

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c476
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I seek to test the opinion of the House on this amendment.

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c476
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kramer

11: After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause—

“Access to affordable credit

(1) The Financial Conduct Authority must—

(a) within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish and publish a framework for assessing and rating the performance of relevant deposit takers in providing access to...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc476-480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments concerns itself with financial inclusion. I have two important but very different amendments in this group. The first is Amendment 11, to which the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Manchester has added his name, and I thank him for that. The House will...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc480-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to speak in this group and, indeed, to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer. There is a thread which unites all the amendments in this group: they all make sense, they are all clear and the Government should accept them.

Before I talk about the...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc483-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have only put forward one amendment to this entire Bill, Amendment 70. I spoke at great length in Committee and highlighted then, as I will highlight now, that I am a chartered accountant and chartered tax adviser, and have conducted probate work over many years.

Let us just...

Member
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc484-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fully echo the comments that the noble Lord, Lord Mackinlay, just made, having had personal experience, sadly, of just what he described. Amendment 70 would provide at least some relief to those executors who cannot

access funds and who see the interest racking up while probate delays...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc485-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have sympathy with all the amendments in the group, but I will focus my comments on Amendment 11 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, to which I added my name. As we have heard, this would require the FCA to establish a framework assessing...

Member
Bishop of Manchester (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc486-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to this interesting debate. I much look forward to the Minister’s response, particularly on child trust funds for those in that

capacity. I agree with my noble friend Lord Mackinlay that we have a problem with HMRC administration...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc487-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to noble Lords for raising these issues around financial inclusion. The Government fully recognise the importance of improving access to appropriate and affordable financial services—particularly those for people on low incomes and in vulnerable circumstances—and of improving the financial education of the nation. We support the intention...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc489-492
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not reargue the points, and I thank everybody who has participated in this debate. I will just say to the Minister on

Amendment 11 that, having cited a number of American banks, I suggest that he goes to talk to them and tell them that this...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c490
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Pitt-Watson

12: Clause 4, page 3, line 34, at end insert—

“(ga) in paragraph 14 (scheme rules), in sub-paragraph (2), omit paragraph (f);”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would remove the power of the scheme operator to make rules providing for the delegation of functions from the Financial Ombudsman to staff, given...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c495
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to the amendments in my name in this group. Before turning to the detail, I should briefly note that almost all these amendments were previously tabled by the Government in Committee, where, in light of concerns expressed about the way in which they were tabled,...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc495-6
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for bringing forward these already tabled amendments, assembled this evening in group 4, and declare my interest as a director of South Molton Street Capital. These amendments, as the Minister explained, remove duplication, correct drafting, make the provisions of the Bill work better together, and make...

Member
Lord Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c496
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharkey

13: Leave out Clause 7

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would remove provisions relating to how the Financial Ombudsman Service may refer matters on complaints to the FCA.

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c496
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to my Amendments 13 to 15 and 99. Clauses 7 and 8 propose radical reform of the relationship between the FOS and the FCA, and of the method of determining complaints to the FOS. These proposals will have a critical effect on consumer protection. They...

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc496-8
House
House of Lords

I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, on making a very powerful case for keeping the existing system under which the FOS operates. The problem here, expressed in the considerable representations that we have received from consumer groups, is a lack of clarity about the problem that this is meant...

Member
Lord Davies of Brixton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc498-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to support my noble friend Lord Sharkey’s amendments. Some years ago, I gave a speech on ethics in finance in connection with the international Robin Cosgrove Prize in which I outlined what I called my eggshell strategy. The premise was simple: we must force firms,...

Member
Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc499-500
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we take a different view on the Financial Ombudsman Service. Our position is that the present FOS model now requires more fundamental reform. We propose that the Treasury should publish draft legislation to replace the FOS with a new financial adjudication service, alongside a dedicated financial services chamber...

Member
Lord Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c500
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start with an apology to the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, if I have failed to respond to him appropriately, but perhaps I can do so in the remarks that I will now make. In response to my noble friend Lord Davies, I am clear that treating customers...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc500-1
House
House of Lords

The key issue that I think the Minister has rather glossed over is the evidence base for making these changes. We have been told it would be coming; it has not come. Consistently, we have been told that letters are being developed, but letters have not arrived. I asked for...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c501
House
House of Lords

Let me try to address that question. The FCA and the FOS are independent. It is not for the Government to decide what was a correct or a false decision. All that the Government are saying is that the criteria by which the FOS adjudicates should be similar to the...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc501-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister and all the others who have spoken for the way in which they have covered the issue. But it is notable that a lack of evidence for the reform proposals still exists. We still have not seen what it is that is wrong with...

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c502
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharkey

14: Leave out Clause 8 and insert the following new Clause—

“Determination of complaints: matters to be taken into account

In section 228 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (determination of complaints under the compulsory jurisdiction of the ombudsman scheme) in subsection (2), at the end insert “,...

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c504
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to test the opinion of the House on Amendment 14.

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c504
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
HC 105 2026-27
House
House of Commons

My Lords, this is the first time I have spoken on Report, so I need to declare my interests as shown in the register, namely, that I hold shares in listed financial services companies, which may well be affected by the content of this Bill.

I start by thanking the Government...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc545-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as an adviser to and shareholder in Banco Santander. Your Lordships will be pleased to know that I will speak very briefly on Amendment 68. My noble friend Lady Noakes just covered the waterfront incredibly well, in her exemplary manner, and made all the...

Member
Lord Bridges of Headley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc547-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by paying tribute to my noble friend Lady Noakes, to the Financial Services Regulation Committee, including the noble Baroness, Lady Bowles, and the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, and to my noble friend Lord Bridges of Headley for their persistent pursuit of a very simple but important...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc548-550
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not take up too much time because I responded to many of the points at the beginning of the debate. On the Independent Evaluation Office at the Bank of England, the Bank is committed to independent evaluation. It is strengthening the independence of the reviews that...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c550
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 17 disagreed to on division (26 to 119). Amendments 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 31 agreed to. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Pitt-Watson
Answering member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe; Lord Altrincham
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc518-550
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Hoey

16: After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause—

“Claims management services: Northern Ireland

(1) The Treasury may by regulations made by statutory instrument make provision for claims management services provided in, from or into Northern Ireland to be regulated under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 on a...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c518
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment follows on from the amendment tabled in Committee by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral. I am bringing the House’s attention to a growing and deeply concerning problem in Northern Ireland’s insurance market. The

market is shrinking in insurer capacity, it is becoming less competitive,...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc518-520
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey. It is well thought through, balanced and modest. The House will be relieved that, for once, neither I nor the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey, are even mentioning the Northern Ireland protocol or the Windsor Framework...

Member
Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc521-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, taking up the last point from the noble Lord, Lord Weir, the Prime Minister, on his recent visits and tour of the UK, has emphasised that the primary focus of the Government is to help people with the cost of living. Because our population in Northern Ireland is...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc522-3
House
House of Lords

I support the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey, and the noble Lords, Lord Weir of Ballyholme and Lord Empey. In doing so, I declare my interest as past chairman of the British Insurance Brokers’ Association and a practising solicitor in the City of London.

We have campaigned within the broking community for...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c523
House
House of Lords

My Lords, notwithstanding the anomalies that have been discussed—there are significant anomalies in insurance in England as well—we have some concerns about this amendment. It would hand the Treasury very extensive powers to act through secondary legislation, including the ability to amend primary legislation. We have raised concerns consistently in...

Member
Lord Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c523
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 16 would give the Treasury the power to extend regulation of claims management activity to Northern Ireland through secondary legislation. I am aware of the concerns relating to high insurance costs across the UK and would be supportive of action to tackle these where we can, but...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc523-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there I was thinking that we had a Minister who was going to be much more reassuring, but, in fact, that was a very negative response. All the things he said have already happened and could be happening in more detail if the Government were to move forward...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c524
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kramer

17: After Clause 13, insert the following new Clause—

“Reimbursement of fraud: liability of technology companies

(1) The FCA must make rules providing that, where a person is to be reimbursed in respect of losses arising from an authorised push payment fraud, the cost of that reimbursement is to be...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc524-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, let me address Amendment 17 in my name, which is also signed by the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, which I very much appreciate. It addresses authorised push payment fraud and would require the tech companies whose platforms are host to this fraud to share in the reimbursement of...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c525
House
House of Lords