Skip to main content

201-220 of 7,383 results for subject:Software

Type

-
Early day motions (19)
+ Legislation (43) + Acts (5)
-
Public acts (5)
+ Bills (3) + Public bills (3)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (35)
-
Statutory instruments (35)
+ Members' contributions (3,524)
-
Business questions (7)
-
Maiden speeches (3)
-
Oral answers to questions (275)
+ Oral questions (278)
-
Prime Minister's questions (19)
-
Topical questions (17)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,971)
+ Parliamentary committees (225) + Committee proceedings (86)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (34)
-
Select Committee reports (83)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (28)
-
Select Committee written evidence (30)
+ Parliamentary papers (413)
-
Command papers (23)
-
Consultation papers (25)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (2)
-
Deposited papers (196)
-
House of Commons papers (174)
-
House of Lords papers (9)
-
Impact assessments (7)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Treaties (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (3)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (268) + Debates (159)
-
Adjournment debates (22)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (86)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (34)
-
Debates on select committee reports (4)
+ Legislative debates (82)
-
Debates on bills (52)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (29)
-
Opposition days (2)
-
Questions for short debate (6)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (91) + Oral statements (28)
-
Ministerial statements (28)
-
Written statements (63)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (5)
-
Ministerial corrections (5)
+ Parliamentary questions (3,397)
-
Business questions (7)
+ Oral questions (278)
-
Prime Minister's questions (19)
-
Topical questions (17)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (3,109)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (13)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (9)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thought I was going to be able to agree with everything the noble and gallant Lord said—right up until the last sentence. I agree with 99% of his question, and I absolutely agree that access to finance for defence firms is incredibly important. The instances that he cites are troubling, and I share his concerns about them. Access to finance is a significant issue for defence firms, particularly SMEs. No company should ever be denied access to financial services solely on the basis that it works in the defence sector, and the banking sector should never take a blanket approach to any one sector. The Government are actively engaging with banks to ensure that they understand the importance of the defence sector and the FCA’s work to understand why banks might close or reject accounts. Where it has found areas in which firms need to improve customer outcomes, the Government expect firms to consider the FCA’s findings.

Answered by
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister find, as I have done, in conversations perhaps not dissimilar to those with the noble Lord, Lord Ranger, that the challenger banks and fintechs are largely serving the same group—although perhaps more efficiently—that is served by the high street banks? Therefore, will he look much more seriously at the potential not just of banking hubs but of community development financial institutions and a way to combine them, so that small businesses can finally get access to the loans and services they need and that individuals who remain excluded finally have access to the banking sector?

Asked by
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c922
House
House of Lords

I agree in large part with what the noble Baroness says. As she will know, as part of the small business strategy, the Government have introduced a range of measures to remove barriers to accessing finance for SMEs. She will know, too, that access to banking services is vital for businesses across the UK. While provision of financial services to companies is largely a commercial matter, the Government of course believe that all customers should be treated fairly.

On access to banking for consumers and banking hubs, we have set out an ambition to have 350 banking hubs. Cash Access UK will deploy a banking hub wherever the industry co-ordinating body responsible suggests that one is appropriate.

Answered by
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, during my time as a trade envoy to Rwanda and Uganda, I noticed first hand that UK businesses could open a bank account in those countries in less than five minutes, but it will take three months, if they are lucky, to open a bank account here. The Minister mentioned that it is a commercial decision, but is heavily legislated for through the Bribery Act, the money laundering Act and many others. Can the Minister please look into this, particularly for SMEs that are starting new businesses and are having real difficulty opening a bank account?

Asked by
Lord Popat (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c923
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord will know that the money laundering regulations rightly mean that, for new customers opening an account, banks are required to take due diligence measures to verify the customers’ identity, assess the intended purpose of the account and flag any suspicious transactions to law enforcement. The regulations are not prescriptive in setting out specific steps that banks should undertake to satisfy customer due diligence, but instead require them to take a proportionate approach, which I think is what the noble Lord is asking for. Each bank will therefore have its own policies and procedures, and those policies should be informed by each bank’s own assessment of the risk faced by its services and customers, based on sources such as the national risk assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing.

Answered by
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c923
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this year has seen a massive increase in offshore unregulated betting. Are these challenger banks following the same procedures and checks as the normal high street banks?

Asked by
Lord Watts (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c923
House
House of Lords

Yes, they would be required to do so.

Answered by
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c923
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the anti-money laundering regulations are imposed on people who are politically exposed without any nuance whatever, and not in accordance with the legislation or regulations, which require banks to assess people on a case-by-case basis—nor are customers told why they are being refused. There appears to be no mechanism for any kind of appeal or redress. Will the Minister talk with the FCA and the numerous ombudsmen who appear to work on this area and at least allow customers to talk to a human being rather than a computer that is programmed to say no in all circumstances?

Asked by
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c923
House
House of Lords

I fully recognise and understand many of the things the noble Lord says. I understand that being a politically exposed person means enhanced scrutiny and administrative burdens and has impacted many noble Lords. Banks and other regulated firms must apply additional checks to customers who meet the definition of a politically exposed person, as well as to their relatives and close associates. That is to mitigate the increased risk that they are targeted for bribery and corruption attempts. While those checks are important, it is essential that they are proportionate to the risks posed; checks should account for the nature of the proposed business relationship and the potential for the product to be misused.

The noble Lord will know that changes to the money laundering regulations now require banks to treat domestic politically exposed persons as inherently lower risk and, in the absence of any other high-risk factors, banks should apply due diligence measures proportionately. In July 2024, the FCA also published its review of the treatment of politically exposed persons, which identified a range of required improvements by the firms that it assessed.

Answered by
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 cc923-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we all recognise that there is a balance to be found between protecting the consumer and encouraging enterprise and growth in this area. But my observation, the observation of many Peers and my own experience of trying to open a new account with Metro Bank is that there is a vast bureaucracy around the FCA and money laundering rules and that that is disadvantaging our challenger banks. Does the Minister agree that the current system tends to favour incumbents, which obviously harms growth and consumers? What practical steps can the Government take to help challenger banks meet the standards efficiently and compete on a level playing field, which we need for innovation?

Asked by
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c924
House
House of Lords

I do not think I agree with the noble Baroness on the question she asked about disadvantaging challenger banks. As I have said already, the regulations are not prescriptive in setting out specific steps that banks should undertake to satisfy customer due diligence; instead, they require them to take a proportionate approach. Each bank therefore has its own policies and procedures, which should be informed by each bank’s own assessment of the risks faced by its services and customers.

Answered by
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
855 c924
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he has taken to ensure the whole population, particularly those who are not natural users of smartphones, are able to access and use the services from the NHS app by 2028.

Asked by
Charlie Maynard (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2026
Reference
127784
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when self-referral to community audiologists will be enabled on the NHS app.

Asked by
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 April 2026
Reference
126304
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether DEFRA has established whether Equal Experts, in conducting the BNG Metric Tool Discovery phase under contract C24064, accessed software products developed by private sector BNG technology companies without those companies' knowledge or consent; and whether her Department...

Asked by
Greg Smith (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
127253
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
HC 1733 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions she has had with the Competition and Markets Authority on the potential impact of software licensing practices on (a) Small to Medium Enterprises in Wales and (b) the Welsh economy.

Asked by
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
124878
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 24 March 2026 to Question 121206 on Police: Vehicles, what guidance has been provided to Chief Constables by the NPCC on understanding and effectively managing risks from connected vehicles.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 April 2026
Reference
123955
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what discussions his Department has had with the Competition and Markets Authority regarding opening a strategic market status investigation into Microsoft and its software licensing practices.

Asked by
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 April 2026
Reference
124190
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she has taken steps to prevent the use of Chinese software connected vehicles by (a) police forces and (b) the security services.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 April 2026
Reference
123960
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many police forces are currently using Chinese software connected vehicles within their fleets.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 April 2026
Reference
123958
House
House of Commons