Skip to main content

21-40 of 650 results for subject:"Class actions"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I just want to probe the Government to an extent on the involvement of the House once the Civil Justice Council has finished its review. It is an independent body. It is not itself a rule-making body; the rules are made by the rule committee. While I absolutely...

Member
Lord Etherton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2024
Reference
837 c665GC
House
House of Lords

I will make the briefest of comments. I welcome the amendments put forward by the Minister. I very much take to heart the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, that the Bill would be pretty pointless unless there was an element of retrospectivity to it. I read the...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2024
Reference
837 c666GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords and noble and learned Lords for all their contributions today. I will try to respond to the substance of the points that noble Lords have raised.

The Supreme Court judgment in PACCAR rendered many litigation funding agreements unenforceable. Uncertainty around litigation funding risks having a...

Member
Lord Stewart of Dirleton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2024
Reference
837 cc666-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have seldom had such pleasure in not pressing an amendment. As the noble and learned Lord said, the CJC review is precisely what we were looking for. Having looked at who is concerned and how they will deal with it, I have no doubt at all that...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2024
Reference
837 c669GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Stewart of Dirleton

2: Clause 1, page 1, line 16, after “order” insert “, an arbitration award or a settlement agreement”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment ensures that the definition of litigation funding agreement includes agreements under which a funder agrees to pay costs relating to litigation that arise by virtue...

Member
Lord Stewart of Dirleton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2024
Reference
837 cc669-670GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Holmes of Richmond

197A: After Clause 103, insert the following new Clause—

“Oversight of biometric technology use by the Information Commission

(1) The Information Commission must establish a Biometrics Office.

(2) The Biometrics Office is to be constituted by a committee of three appointed commissioners with relevant expertise.

(3) It is the function...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc362-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to take part in today’s Committee proceedings. I declare my technology interests as an adviser to Boston Limited. It is self-evident that we have been talking about data but there could barely be a more significant piece of data than biometrics. In moving the...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc363-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name in support of the stand part notices of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, to Clauses 147, 148 and 149. These clauses would abolish the office of the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner, along with the surveillance camera code of practice. I am going...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc364-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to speak briefly in support of, first, the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lord Holmes, which would recreate the office of the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner.

As I have done on a number of occasions, I shall tell a short story; it is...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c365GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I find myself in a fortunate position: we have made progress fast enough to enable me to go from one end of the Room to the other and play a modest part in this debate. I do so because, at an earlier stage, I identified the amendments tabled...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc365-7GC
House
House of Lords

I do not have the benefit of seeing a Hansard update to know after which word I was interrupted and we had to leave to vote, so I will just repeat, I hope not unduly, the main point I was making at the time of the Division. This was that...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc367-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been a pleasure to listen to noble Lords’ speeches in this debate. We are all very much on the same page and have very much the same considerations in mind. Both the protection of biometric data itself and also the means by which we regulate its...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc368-370GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to what has been an excellent debate on this issue. We have all been united in raising our concerns about whether the offices of the biometrics commissioner and the surveillance camera commissioner should be abolished. We all feel the need...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc370-2GC
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend Lord Holmes, the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, and the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, as well as other co-signatories for detailed examination of the Bill through these amendments.

I begin by addressing Amendments 197A, 197B and 197C tabled by my noble friend Lord Holmes, which seek to...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c371GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry, but I am wondering whether the Minister is going to say any more on the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Holmes. Can I be clear? The Minister said that the ICO is the best place to oversee these issues, but the noble Lord’s...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c373GC
House
House of Lords

I apologise if I have misunderstood. It sounds like it would be a unit within the ICO responsible for that matter. Let me take that away if I have misunderstood—I understood it to be a separate organisation altogether.

The Government deem Amendment 238 unnecessary, as using biometric data to categorise or...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc373-4GC
House
House of Lords

One of the crucial aspects has been the reporting of the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner. Where is there going to be and who is going to have a comprehensive report relating to the use of surveillance cameras and the biometric data contained within them? Why have the Government decided...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c374GC
House
House of Lords

Yes. There are indeed a number of different elements of surveillance camera oversight; those are reflected in the range of different bodies doing that it. As to the mechanics of the production of the report, I am afraid that I do not know the answer.

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c374GC
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that the police are one of the key agencies that will be using surveillance cameras? He now seems to be saying, “No, it’s fine. We don’t have one single oversight body; we had four at the last count”. He probably has more to say on this...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c374GC
House
House of Lords

No. I was saying that there was extensive consultation, including with the police, and that that has resulted in these new arrangements. As to the actual mechanics of the production of an overall report, I am afraid that I do not know but I will find out and advise noble...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc374-6GC
House
House of Lords