Skip to main content

101-200 of 14,856 results for subject:Functions

Type

+ Legislation (533) + Acts (34) + Private acts (4)
-
Local acts (4)
-
Public acts (30)
+ Bills (66)
-
Hybrid bills (1)
+ Public bills (65)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (35)
+ Private members' bills (29)
-
Ballot bills (5)
-
Presentation bills (10)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (11)
+ Delegated legislation (433) + Statutory instruments (433)
-
Legislative reform orders (2)
-
Regulatory reform orders (1)
+ Members' contributions (11,841)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Maiden speeches (4)
-
Oral answers to questions (127)
+ Oral questions (127)
-
Prime Minister's questions (5)
-
Proceeding contributions (11,587)
+ Parliamentary committees (517) + Committee proceedings (463)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (53)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (129)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (231)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (9)
-
Select Committee reports (28)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (14)
-
Select Committee written evidence (20)
+ Parliamentary papers (632)
-
Annual reports (8)
-
Command papers (21)
-
Consultation papers (96)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (6)
-
Deposited papers (510)
-
House of Commons papers (52)
-
House of Lords papers (16)
-
Impact assessments (26)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
-
Unprinted papers (17)
-
White papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (871) + Debates (790)
-
Adjournment debates (6)
+ Committee proceedings (463)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (53)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (129)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (231)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (9)
-
Debates on select committee reports (3)
+ Legislative debates (760)
-
Debates on bills (502)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (258)
-
Questions for short debate (6)
+ Formal proceedings (3)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (3)
+ Statements (61) + Oral statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Written statements (56)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,035)
-
Business questions (1)
+ Oral questions (127)
-
Prime Minister's questions (5)
-
Written questions (907)
+ Research briefings (77) + Commons Briefing papers (58)
-
Briefing papers on bills (15)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (16)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (9)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (3)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Bichard, Lord Wallace of Saltaire and Lord Ravensdale, for amendments on collaboration. I will start with the government amendments in this group, which are minor and technical in nature. Their purpose is to align relevant definitions across the Bill. Taken together, they...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1657-1661
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to talk to Amendment 181, which is grouped with this. Britain has an unwritten constitution, which gives us flexibility but also lacks constraint on changing Prime Ministers or Governments beyond trust in their behaving like good chaps. As we have discovered in recent years, not all...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1661-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 309 in this group seeks to impose a duty to co-operate on local public service partners. I again thank the noble Lord, Lord Shipley, for adding his name in support.

I will not repeat at length the arguments I rehearsed in Committee in support of the amendment,...

Member
Lord Bichard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1662-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak on this group of amendments on collaboration. I will not comment on the government amendments, other than to say that we consider them to be technical and will not stand in the way of the Government. I must declare my interest as an ex-chairman...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1663
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the debate on this group. I will start with Amendment 181. I absolutely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Wallace, about the overcentralisation of decision-making in England, and that is part of the whole rationale for bringing the Bill forward. I must be clear...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1663-6
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness sits down, can she clarify one point? We are heading towards a model of English governance in which there will be roughly 35 elected mayors. Do the Government envisage that the Council of the Nations and Regions will then have the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government,...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1665
House
House of Lords

Those bodies are new bodies, and they will be evolving and changing as we evolve and change the model. They are not decision-making bodies. That is the main reason for saying we do not want to put them in statute, particularly in view of the fact that they will change...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1662
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

89: Clause 21, page 26, line 20, leave out “one or more of the areas” and insert “any aspect of any area”

Member's explanatory statement

This would make this wording consistent with the wording used in paragraph 4 of Schedule 25 (in the definition of “eligible function”).

90: Clause...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1663-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

91: Clause 22, page 27, line 17, leave out “one or more areas” and insert “any aspect of any area”

Member's explanatory statement

This would make this wording consistent with the wording used in paragraph 4 of Schedule 25 (in the definition of “eligible function”).

92: Clause 22, page...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1665
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ravensdale

93: Clause 22, page 33, line 14, at end insert—

“103F Regional collaboration

(1) Two or more elected mayors may collaborate across mayoral combined authorities and create convening bodies whose purpose, priorities and membership are decided at a regional level.

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), convening bodies must work...

Member
Lord Ravensdale (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1665-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to my Amendments 93, 119 and 183. I thank all noble Lords who supported these amendments across Committee and now on Report, including the noble Lords, Lord Young of Cookham, Lord Shipley and Lord Blunkett, and the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, and the noble Earl,...

Member
Lord Ravensdale (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1667-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was delighted to add my name to Amendment 93 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Ravensdale. As we have heard, this Bill aims to put English devolution on to a stronger footing so that local leaders can drive economic growth and close the persistent and...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1668-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to talk about the south-west, following the comments made by the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, and about how well the greater south-west grouping is working. To give noble Lords an example, they have come together and commissioned a successful system of getting wifi continuously on...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1670-1668
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I see group 5 on social mobility as one of the most important that we have to consider on this second day on Report. I pay tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Ravensdale, for his commitment to increasing social mobility and his work to promote that and to...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1668-1671
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am also grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Ravensdale, for bringing forward Amendments 93, 119 and 183, which address regional collaboration and the vital issue of social mobility, as we have heard.

Amendment 93, in the name of the noble Lord and supported by my noble friend Lady...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1671-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Ravensdale, for these amendments, and for taking a great deal of time and trouble to discuss them with me in recent weeks. The amendments relate to pan-regional collaboration, tackling youth unemployment and gathering social mobility data. I agree with the...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1672-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that comprehensive response and for the collaborative approach she has taken in response to these amendments and in all the various letters that have been flying back and forth over the past couple of days on this matter. I appreciate the commitments she...

Member
Lord Ravensdale (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1674-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

94: Clause 22, page 33, line 19, leave out “one or more areas” and insert “any aspect of any area”

Member’s explanatory statement

This would make this wording consistent with the wording used in paragraph 4 of Schedule 25 (in the definition of “eligible function”).

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1672-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle

97: Schedule 5, page 140, line 33, after “vehicle” insert “, including those used for delivery services”

Member’s explanatory statement

This is an amendment to ensure that providers of non-passenger micromobility vehicles referred to in this Schedule also include those who provide these vehicles for delivery services.

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1675
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 97, I will speak also to the many others in my name in this group. I apologise for that, although they fall into four distinct subject areas, so that partly explains the number of them. My noble friend Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb moved and spoke...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1675-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 99, which picks up the issues of providing parking and docking for licensed micromobility vehicles at the appropriate density and standard, and requiring traffic authorities and Great British Railways—when it is fully completed—to co-operate on the provision of parking at or near railway...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1677
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak in particular to Amendment 100 in this group but congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett, on opening this group of interesting amendments. I thank the Minister for meeting us prior to Report and bringing forward a first stab at a definition of micromobility vehicles. It...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1677-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my task is very simple this afternoon, and that is to thank the Government and congratulate them on bringing forward Amendments 245 and 265, which will ensure that proper enforcement action can now be taken against those who breach parking conditions and park on pavements. This has long...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1677-1680
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join my noble friend in congratulating the Government on this pavement parking issue.

I will speak in a bit more detail to Amendment 100 and focus on insurance, which the noble Baroness, Lady McIntosh of Pickering, has been speaking about. She was talking about things that she does...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1680-1679
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my name appears in two or three places in this grouping. I join the noble Lord, Lord Bassam of Brighton, in saying how important Amendment 245 and the consequential amendment are. I have campaigned for many years on pavement parking. I finally feel that action is being taken,...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1679-1681
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am beginning to feel slightly left out. I have not been the beneficiary of a large amount of correspondence from the Minister in the way other noble Lords scattered around the Chamber appear to have been. I do not have the advantage of his support and the...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1681-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Moylan, Lord Shipley and Lord Bassam, and the noble Baronesses, Lady McIntosh, Lady Pidgeon and Lady Bennett of Manor Castle, for their amendments, and my noble friend Lord Berkeley for his contribution. I say in response to him that this Government are...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1682-6
House
House of Lords

It was not my suggestion that the mayor needed to be supervised: it was the suggestion of the Labour Party drafters of the 1999 GLA Act, which I am simply standing up for. So reject it by all means, but do not cast that upon me.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1686
House
House of Lords

I say to the noble Lord that the successors of those people have changed their minds, so it is about time that he did, too. We have had the experience of three mayors, over 25 years, and there is no evidence that they have been incapable of taking these decisions....

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1682-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for a typically thoughtful and comprehensive response to a very large and complex group of amendments, and I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in debating this group. I also join other noble Lords in celebrating government

Amendments 245 and 265. I...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1687-9
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Baroness McIntosh of Pickering

100: Schedule 5, page 146, line 11, at end insert—

“(3) The regulations must make provision for a licence to prohibit the provider of micromobility vehicles from providing a pedal cycle or electrically assisted pedal cycle to a person who does not have insurance.”

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1687-9
House
House of Lords

I would like to clarify something on the Highway Code. The Minister was absolutely right that the Highway Code is available in hard copy. It is when it is updated more than once in quick succession that the changes are available only on the internet.

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1689
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

101: Schedule 7, page 154, line 29, leave out “(5)” and insert “(5A)”

Member’s explanatory statement

This would be consequential on the other amendment of Schedule 7 in my name.

102: Schedule 7, page 155, line 21, at end insert—

“(5A) But the mayor for the area of a mayoral...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1689-1690
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Lord Moylan

104: Schedule 9, page 159, line 28, at end insert—

“(1C) The key route network must consist only of classified numbered roads carrying strategic motor traffic.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment ensures that the highways or proposed highways that constitute the KRN are genuinely strategic.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1690
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I heard the comments of the Minister in relation to guidance to be issued and, with that, I will not move the amendment.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1690
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

106: Schedule 9, page 164, line 7, leave out “CCA” and insert “combined authority”

Member’s explanatory statement

This provision is about combined authorities, and so this amendment would correct the reference to “CCA” that appears here.

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1690
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Jamieson

121: After Clause 37, insert the following new Clause—

“Brownfield land priority

(1) A mayor, combined authority, or combined county authority may not designate greenfield land for development unless it is satisfied that no suitable brownfield land is available within the relevant area.

(2) In determining suitability under subsection (1), regard...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1691
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment is in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Scott of Bybrook. There is near universal agreement that a “brownfield first” strategy is the right one. Not only does it save green fields but new developments benefit from existing infrastructure, homes are delivered where...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1691-2
House
House of Lords

I will say a few words in general support of the principle of this amendment. We supported it during the passage of the Planning and Infrastructure Act, so it would make sense to do so here.

It was good old John Prescott who first promoted “brownfield first” and, ever since then,...

Member
Baroness Thornhill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1692
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson, for Amendment 121 about brownfield land. I agree that we should always use brownfield land wherever possible. As succinctly articulated by the noble Baroness, Lady Thornhill, one reason for promoting the development of town centres and cities is that there is...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1692-3
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Thornhill, for her comments and the Minister for hers. Let us be clear: this is about doing what everyone has said that we need to do, which is developing on brownfield first. It is not about preventing development anywhere else. This is about creating...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1693
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

128: Transpose Clause 41 to after Clause 50

Member’s explanatory statement

The amendment of clause 2 in my name would add culture as an “area of competence” in the Bill, and it would appear as the last in the list of areas. Clause 41 falls more readily in...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1693
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Fuller

129: Clause 42, page 43, line 20, leave out "develop" and insert "promote"

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, together with other amendments from Lord Fuller in Clause 42, seeks to make clear the separation of duties between Mayor and Local Government Pension Scheme to avoid any potential conflicts of interest...

Member
Lord Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1696
House
House of Lords

I will speak briefly to this group, and I am grateful to the Minister for engaging with me on the narrow point. These three amendments, which are mostly the same, are supportive of what the Government are trying to achieve.

In Clause 42, there is a requirement for mayors to co-operate...

Member
Lord Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1696
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly to the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lord Fuller, which all address an important and practical issue: the clear separation of duties between the mayor and the Local Government Pension Scheme. At its heart, this is about avoiding conflicts of interest,...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1696-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Fuller, for Amendments 129 to 131 and for the time he took to discuss them with me. I recognise his intention to clarify the roles and responsibilities of strategic authorities and pension funds in making local investments. I agree that...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1697-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think I laid out that relationships should be close but not cosy between the mayor and the funds. I accept the reciprocity between this Bill and the Pension Schemes Bill, which we debated earlier. I accept the Minister’s assurance and, on that basis, I beg leave to...

Member
Lord Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1698
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Scott of Bybrook

132: Clause 44, page 46, leave out lines 25 to 37 and insert—

“(a) the availability and standards of housing, transport services or public safety,

(b) environmental factors, including air quality, and access to green space and bodies of water,

(c) employment prospects, earning capacity and any other matters...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 c1698
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 132 is on the general health determinants listed under Clause 44. Under that clause, combined authorities must have regard to improving the health of people in their area. Our amendments would expand the current list of general health determinants to include the availability, as opposed to...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1698-9
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Answering member
David Simmonds
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
23 March 2026
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 cc205-212GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these regulations were laid on 11 February 2026. Before I proceed, I draw the Committee’s attention to a correction slip that has been issued for these regulations. It corrects the name of the appropriate administering authority for pension purposes from East Sussex to West Sussex. This change was...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 cc209-210GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her introduction to this statutory instrument, one in a series of statutory instruments creating county combined authorities that we have discussed over several months.

I start with what the Minister said about the purpose of this statutory instrument: that the Government wish to “widen...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 cc207-211GC
House
House of Lords

I commend the Government on getting on with doing something on this agenda. I am a massive fan of mayoral authorities. If that is the price to pay to take power away from Whitehall and Westminster, it is a price worth paying. It could have been a bit cheaper, but...

Member
Lord Porter of Spalding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 cc211-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also thank the Minister for her introduction to these regulations. We on these Benches support the principle of devolution. As the Minister outlined, these regulations will establish a new combined county authority for Brighton, Hove, East Sussex and West Sussex under the framework set up in the...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 cc212-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their contributions and their broad support for the Sussex and Brighton authority, which I think is broadly welcomed in the local area.

The noble Baroness, Lady Pinnock, asked me about the 6,000 responses. The purpose of the consultation was to gather evidence and information...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 cc213-5GC
House
House of Lords

When we have requested a timetable for devolution elsewhere, the Minister has said that elections in May 2028 would be held not only in the six priority areas but in a number of other authorities, as part of this devolution. I am slightly confused as, if there is a need...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 c209GC
House
House of Lords

The time periods are quite compressed, as the next tranche of 14 areas will be decided before the Summer Recess. The decision-making is quite close together and it is up to us to make sure that we get these SIs through, so that the foundation strategic authorities are in place...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
854 c209GC
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
Date
19 March 2026
Reference
HL 279 2024-26
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Leong
Answering member
Viscount Camrose
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 cc149-155GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these regulations were laid before the House in draft on 2 February. They make consequential amendments to references to the Information Commissioner and their office—the ICO—across the statute book. They reflect the reforms to the regulator’s governance structure introduced by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.

Specifically, that...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 c157GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his introduction. Of course, we recognise that this instrument is a technical necessity. It ensures that the statute book remains coherent as we transition from the Office of the Information Commissioner to the new Information Commission. Obviously, not to agree these regulations would...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 cc157-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too thank the Minister for introducing these regulations. I note that he is having a spectacularly busy day. Clearly, these regulations are essentially technical in nature, as the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, said, but they play an important role in ensuring that the statute book remains coherent...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 cc152-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I am really grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and the noble Viscount, Lord Camrose, for their contributions. The Government are committed to the integrity of the new data protection regulator, the Information Commission. Having regulatory powers and responsibilities shared across an independent board, rather than...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 cc153-160GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, but there must be a planning date. If any private business were transforming itself, it would have a target date of April the 5th or 6th, or whatever it might be, but there seems to be no certainty here, and therefore...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 c160GC
House
House of Lords

I said earlier that the appointment process is currently taking place. The current Information Commissioner will be chair, and the current CEO will be interim CEO until the new Information Commission is set up. The composition of the governing board—the executive and non-executive directors—is currently in process; we have appointed...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 cc160-1GC
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Louise Sandher-Jones
Answering member
Ben Obese-Jecty
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
17 March 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the answer of 9 February 2026 to Question 108227 on Combined Authorities: Surrey, whether other strategic authorities will be given the transport and adult skill functions held by county councils; and whether its role will include...

Asked by
James Cleverly (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
117309
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on division (12 votes to 4).

Lead member
Kate Dearden
Answering member
Harriett Baldwin
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
10 March 2026
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Ian Murray
Answering member
Ben Spencer
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Sixth Delegated Legislation Committee
Notes
Contribution by Ian Murray at c. 6 corrected on 11 March 2026 at 782 cc2-4WC.
Date
4 March 2026
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Andrew Western
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
SI 2026/447; 2026/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Andrew Western
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
SI 2026/448; 2026/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Andrew Western
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
SI 2026/446; 2026/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
SI 2026/362; 2026/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Date
10 February 2026
House
House of Commons

That is a very fair point. I was indicating that we will have some further discussions about it. If I bring further amendments back on Report, we will need to be clear about putting some flexible powers into the Bill so that we can extend it if we need to....

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c28GC
House
House of Lords

Or it could be withdrawn.

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c28GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, it could be withdrawn.

5.30 pm

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c28GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

180A: Schedule 24, page 263, line 14, leave out “(whenever passed or made)” and insert “passed before, or in the same Session as, this Act”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to limit the Secretary of State's power to amend future Acts of Parliament using secondary legislation, in line with...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c29GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we turn now to a group of amendments that all relate to the exercise of delegated powers to amend future legislation—Henry VIII powers. They are powers by way of statutory instrument to amend primary legislation in the future. The relevant document—if noble Lords are interested to read it...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc29-30GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for not having spoken in the previous debates on this Bill due to the pressure of work. The noble Lord, Lord Lansley, has spoken eloquently to his amendments, and I agree with nearly everything he has said. I will speak to Amendment 184 in my name,...

Member
Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc30-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not seek to repeat what has been said so eloquently by my noble friend Lord Lansley and the noble Baroness, Lady Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville.

The issue is quite simple. This is supposed to be a devolution Bill about local empowerment; it is not supposed to be...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc31-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, and the noble Baroness, Lady Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville, for their proposed amendments to the delegated powers in the Bill. I also thank the House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee for its report and its recommendations regarding the...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc32-4GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville, not only for her supportive comments on all these amendments but for her participation in the Committee’s scrutiny. We are grateful to the Delegated Powers Committee for the time and trouble that it takes in drawing these things...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc34-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, by opposing Schedule 25, we seek to probe and clarify what functions may be delegated to mayors under future regulations. Prior to the changes proposed by this Bill, the principal mechanisms for conferring local authority and public authority functions on combined authorities were set out in the Local...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc35-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, briefly, I express my support for what the noble Baroness, Lady Scott of Bybrook, said. I suggest to the Minister that it might help, particularly as we approach the tabling of amendments on Report, if the Government were to produce a grid that shows what powers will reside...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c36GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, support what my noble friend Lady Scott of Bybrook was saying. I recall that she was responsible for Sections 18, 19 and 20 of LURA, on the conferral of functions on county combined authorities—as they were at that time—so she has been down this track.

I have three quick...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c37GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Scott, for probing whether Schedule 25 should stand part of the Bill. Schedule 25 is central to the objectives of the Bill and the Government’s ambitions for devolution in England. We have been clear that the devolution framework delivered by this Bill...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc37-8GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt but I have a question. When the Minister talks about extending the list in future, is that the list of functions within areas of competence, or is she talking about the ability to extend the list of areas of competence?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c38GC
House
House of Lords

I am talking about the functions within the competence.

The Secretary of State will be required to consult relevant parties, including the strategic authority, the constituent councils and any body that currently holds the function. The Secretary of State will then need to determine whether to confer the function, paying regard...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c38GC
House
House of Lords

In view of the points made in the debate on this group of amendments, is it going to change?

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c38GC
House
House of Lords

The competencies are there, so the powers will stay the same as in the grid that we have set out. I ask the noble Lord to have a look at it and, by all means, to come back to me if he has any questions on it.

The Government will be...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c39GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response; however, I think we will need to go back to Hansard. My example, for instance, was not on the pilots. It was an example on the changes that have been made in this Bill to, in particular, the levelling-up Act. I will of...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c39GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in proposing that Clause 53 should not stand part of the Bill, I should emphasise that I am not opposed to the clause—far from it. We have now had three debates about the role of local government in the health service, and I want to probe how far...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc40-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to speak to my Amendment 185. It is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, with his rallying cry, and I hope that at least he supports what I am seeking to do with this amendment.

To me, a simple yet essential principle that...

Member
Lord Gascoigne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc41-3GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord did not mention the questions of where the taxes are raised and who is responsible. For those of us on the Liberal Democrat Benches, the differences between decentralisation and devolution are tax and money. So long as the Treasury retains control of the spending, we will have...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c43GC
House
House of Lords

I agree with my noble friend Lord Wallace of Saltaire. I totally share his view, and we will come on to that matter in the next group. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Gascoigne, for what he said, which was important. I am sure that the Minister, through this grid...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc43-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before we complete this group, I just want to say that what the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, said by way of moving his probing amendment asks not only important questions but questions to which we will have to come back, if not in this Bill...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 c44GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, turning first to Clause 53, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, for his probing stand part notice. As we have said more than once, the devolution of health is a complex matter that raises many important questions—particularly, as we have heard, around...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc44-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Hunt of Kings Heath and the noble Lord, Lord Gascoigne, for their amendments. I turn first to my noble friend Lord Hunt probing whether Clause 53 should stand part of the Bill.

Clause 53 places limits on the devolution of health functions to...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
853 cc45-7GC
House
House of Lords