Skip to main content

101-200 of 2,841 results for subject:Leave

Type

-
Early day motions (5)
+ Legislation (60) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (22) + Public bills (22)
-
Consolidation bills (2)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (18)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (7)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (9)
+ Delegated legislation (35)
-
Statutory instruments (35)
+ Members' contributions (2,082)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Maiden speeches (3)
-
Oral answers to questions (48)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (51)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,979)
+ Parliamentary committees (35) + Committee proceedings (27)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (10)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Select Committee reports (6)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (2)
+ Parliamentary papers (62)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (3)
-
Deposited papers (46)
-
House of Commons papers (4)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
-
Impact assessments (13)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (101) + Debates (85)
-
Adjournment debates (3)
-
Backbench debates (3)
+ Committee proceedings (27)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (10)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (72)
-
Debates on bills (53)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (19)
+ Statements (16) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (15)
+ Parliamentary questions (571)
-
Business questions (1)
+ Oral questions (51)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Written questions (519)
+ Research briefings (10) + Commons Briefing papers (6)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (3)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I was going to speak to the amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady Penn, but certain Members are heckling me. I will just say how important this amendment is and that I hope the House will support it.

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 c344
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a good speech is a short speech.

Like the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, I have spent most of this debate rewriting my speech. I have tried hard to listen to what noble Lords have said. We have three options before us tonight: the Government option of a consultation; the...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 cc344-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is clear from the debate that we have had this evening that this is an issue about which there is considerable concern. This Government recognise those concerns about the impact of screen time and about children’s online safety, particularly given some immensely troubling cases. This is a...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 cc346-350
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief. My only plea to noble Lords, as we take this issue forward beyond today’s debate in the Chamber—as I have no doubt that we will—is that we keep the interests of our very youngest children in mind. If we think that companies and the...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 cc345-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Nash

92: After Clause 27, insert the following new Clause—

“Action to prohibit the provision of VPN services to children in the United Kingdom

(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed the Secretary of State must, for the purpose of furthering the protection and wellbeing...

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 cc350-1
House
House of Lords

I beg to move.

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 c351
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Nash

94A: After Clause 27, insert the following new Clause—

“Action to promote the wellbeing of children in relation to social media

(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must, for the purposes of promoting the wellbeing of children—

(a) direct the...

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 cc351-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Mohammed of Tinsley

94B: In subsection (1)(b), at end insert

“subject to any exemptions under subsection (1A).

(1A) Any exemptions to regulations made under subsection (1)(b)—

(a) must be specified only by Ofcom and the Children’s Commissioner acting jointly, and

(b) can only apply where—

(i) the primary purpose of the exemption is to...

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 cc354-5
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords for the debate that we have had, but I would still like to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 c355
House
House of Lords

Oh!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
852 c355
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 29 agreed to. Amendment 32 disagreed to on division (59 to 127). (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Baroness Blake of Leeds
Answering member
Baroness Barran
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on bills
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1810-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

29: Clause 5, page 10, line 5, at end insert—

“(8) Before publishing its kinship local offer (or any updated version) a local authority must—

(a) consult relevant persons about any services that are offered, or may be offered, by the local authority which may assist to improve...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1810-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have heard the concerns raised by noble Lords in Committee, and in the other House, about ensuring that kinship local offers meet the needs of kinship families. Having reflected, we agree that a duty to consult and publish a report of consultation would strengthen the expectations already...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1811
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is obviously an important issue to us. Although we welcome the Bill’s placing on a statutory footing the extension of virtual school head support to a wider group of children in kinship care, the positive impact of this will be significantly limited due to a lack of...

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1811-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on these Benches, we welcome government Amendment 29.

As the noble Lord, Lord Storey, said about his Amendment 44, there is a gap where the Government have extended the role of virtual school heads but not extended pupil premium plus to children in kinship care. As a minimum movement...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1812
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak very briefly to Amendment 48. As an ex-kinship carer, I know that there are times when it is incredibly stressful, such as when you are dealing with bereavements and all sorts of issues. You will be dealing children who have gone through this and might...

Member
Lord Hampton (Crossbench; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1812
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Barran

31: After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—

“Requirements for kinship care approval: disapplication

In regulation 26 of the Fostering Services (England) Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011/581), after paragraph (9) insert—

“(10) This regulation does not apply to kinship carers.”.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This removes the requirement for kinship carers who have been...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1806
House
House of Lords

I open by thanking the Minister for those final remarks, particularly in relation to kinship leave and the school census.

The Government have acknowledged that the kinship rules need reviewing and updating. The amendments in my name and the name of the noble Lord, Lord Hampton, who brings real experience as...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1807-1816
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I preface my remarks by noting how much support the Government have given to the whole area of carers, as indeed did the previous Government. I look at my party and Ed Davey’s experience as a carer. I do not think you can imagine what it must be...

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1816
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 31 and 32 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Barran. I start by welcoming the commitment to kinship care. It has not always been like this. I remember that, when we started this several years ago, there was a lot of...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1816-8
House
House of Lords

Could the Minister give us an estimate, or guesstimate, of when she thinks the review will be completed?

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1817
House
House of Lords

I cannot give that exact information, other than to say that the consultation is starting, which means that it is going at pace. I understand the frustration and the need to get on with this. We all want to get on with this: it is an important piece in our...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1817
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Storey, for asking that question as it was the one I was going to start with, so that was perfect, and I thank the Minister again for her remarks. I absolutely accept her point that we need a holistic review of the kinship care...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1817-9
House
House of Lords

I have received information that we are hoping for completion by summer 2027, which is not quite a year but is not far off.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1819
House
House of Lords

I appreciate that, but hoping is hoping. I seem to remember that, even when we were in government, one or two deadlines were not met, and even then we still have to find legislative time. It is important, for the reasons that I have set out, that we test the...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1819
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Barran

32: After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—

“Kinship care report and regulations

(1) The Secretary of State must, with 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, carry out a review assessing the effectiveness of the current pathways for approval of kinship carers.

(2) The Secretary...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1810
House
House of Lords

I beg to move.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1820
House
House of Lords

I rise to speak to Amendments 44, 45 and 48, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Storey. I will pick up on some of the other issues, as they flow between the amendments. All these amendments speak to the desire, which the Government share with others in this House, to...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1813-4
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Peter Kyle
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
SI 2026/238; 2026/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of introducing a new right to kinship care leave.

Asked by
Lee Dillon (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 December 2025
Reference
97651
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will make it his policy to support paid leave for fertility appointments.

Asked by
Chris Coghlan (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2025
Reference
97026
House
House of Commons

Motion lapsed. Motion made and Question proposed, That this House do now adjourn. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Rebecca Smith
Answering member
Josh MacAlister
Department
Department for Education
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 cc137-142
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to have secured this Adjournment debate on statutory support for self-employed adoptive parents. Self-employed adopters are currently excluded from any statutory parental pay. For far too long, this exclusion has been overlooked as too niche a problem, but in fact it exposes a much deeper inconsistency in...

Member
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 c137
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Lady on securing this debate; I spoke to her beforehand to ask her permission to intervene and to very quickly give her a Northern Ireland perspective. In Northern Ireland, shared parental leave and pay—SPL and ShPP—are entitlements as financial support for adoptive parents. If one adopter...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 c138
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his contribution and particularly for highlighting the case in Northern Ireland. Parental leave and shared parental leave for adopters was something that the previous Government fought hard to bring in, so I agree that that is something that should apply across all our isles....

Member
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 cc138-141
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for South West Devon (Rebecca Smith) for securing this debate and highlighting these important issues. Having spoken to her in our first week in this place as newly elected Members of Parliament, I know she cares deeply about these issues, and I welcome her bringing...

Member
Josh MacAlister (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 c141
House
House of Commons

I am pleased that the parental leave and pay review is looking at these issues as part of its work, and I encourage Members to engage with the review as it continues.

The Department for Education’s statutory guidance is clear that where self-employed adopters do not qualify for any statutory payment,...

Member
Josh MacAlister (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 cc141-2088
House
House of Commons

The Minister mentioned the review and said that it is under way. He did not mention how long it will take, and I note that the hon. Member for South West Devon (Rebecca Smith) asked for some guidance on the timeline. I would be grateful if he could give that...

Member
Lisa Smart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 c2088
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for those questions. I will directly answer the questions that the hon. Member for South West Devon asked in a moment, but I take the broader point about encouraging local authorities to ensure that adopters in their area are aware of the support available to...

Member
Josh MacAlister (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
777 cc2088-142
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Shabana Mahmood
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
8 December 2025
Reference
SI 2025/1274
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, further to the Cabinet Office Annual report and accounts 2024-2025, HC1372, 23 October 2025, page 110, (a) how many total staff days were taken as paid special leave for volunteering in 2024–25 under the Cabinet Office volunteering policy, (b) what the estimated...

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 2025
Reference
92007
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what his policy is on Royal Fleet Auxiliary personnel returning from maternity leave being required to (a) return to sea-based duties within a specified timeframe and (b) take unpaid leave to cover gaps in shore-based assignments.

Asked by
Amanda Martin (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 November 2025
Reference
90991
House
House of Commons

Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 323). To be read a second time on 28 November.

Lead member
Alice Macdonald
Type
Debates on bills
Date
4 November 2025
Reference
774 cc764-7
House
House of Commons
Member
Alice Macdonald (Labour)
Type
Ten minute rule bills
Date
4 November 2025
Reference
Bill 320 2024-26
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision for a right to paid time off work for fertility treatment; and for connected purposes.

Deciding to start or grow our family should be a time of joy and happiness, and of making plans for the...

Member
Alice Macdonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2025
Reference
774 cc764-7
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department plans to take steps to ensure that (a) kinship and (b) foster carers have the same employment leave rights as (i) adoptive, (ii) maternity and (iii) paternity carers.

Asked by
Jenny Riddell-Carpenter (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 2025
Reference
84062
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I have already spoken to Motion M. I beg to move.

Motion M1 (as an amendment to Motion M)

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1269
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharpe of Epsom

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1269
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1269
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Leong

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1269
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will confirm the policy in the letter sent by my noble friends Lady Smith and Lady Jones, to which the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, referred.

The purpose of the SSSNB is to ensure that school support staff are entitled to at least a statutory minimum level of pay...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1269-1276
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Barran

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1276
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that clarification, but I take little reassurance from it, in particular the idea of what will happen in the next few years to the focus of the SSSNB. In this House, we make legislation beyond the next few years. With that, I would like to...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1276
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendment 1 not insisted on and amendment 1B in lieu agreed to on division (302 to 159). Lords amendments 7 and 8 not insisted on. Lords amendment 21 not insisted on and Commons amendments 21A and 21B in lieu agreed to. Commons...

Lead member
Lord Collins of Highbury; Lord Leong; Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Answering member
Lord Hunt of Wirral; Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Baroness Barran
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1217-1276
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Collins of Highbury

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1217
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Motion A, and shall also speak to Motions B, E, E1, H and H1.

I start by thanking your Lordships’ House for the constructive contributions, debate and scrutiny that this Bill has received throughout its passage. The Bill has been strengthened in many places in...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1218-1220
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Fox

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1220
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think I am right in welcoming the Minister, noble Lord, Lord Collins, to the Bill. I too missed all of Report and so I thank my noble friends Lord Goddard, Lord Palmer and Lady Kramer for picking up the pieces. The Minister and I find ourselves at...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1221-2
House
House of Lords

First, I am also very grateful to the Minister and his new colleagues for their time during the past couple of weeks. I also thank the noble Lord, Lord Fox, for his amendment. If he wishes to test the opinion of the House, we will support him.

3.45 pm

Turning to Motion...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1222-4
House
House of Lords

Motion E1 is the most important amendment we will be debating today. The introduction of day one unfair dismissal rights is the most damaging element in this Bill, in my opinion. While there are problems with much of the Bill, there will, I believe, be a lot of unintended consequences.

For...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1223-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose Motion E1, which is unnecessary. Under the Employment Rights Bill, employers can still dismiss workers fairly—for example, as they can now if they are incompetent or there is misconduct or a redundancy situation. But without the day one protection proposed by the Government, when workers move...

Member
Baroness O'Grady of Upper Holloway (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1226-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords have mentioned the lack of detail in the Bill. As somebody who has been heavily engaged in employment law over the last 40 years, I am very much aware of the need to ensure that there is secondary legislation to give time to consult on issues....

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1227-8
House
House of Lords

I was hoping to hear an answer to the question posed by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Phillips: without a qualifying period, will employers take on people with a criminal record? That question has not been answered. Secondly, Clause 25 talks about the right not to be unfairly dismissed,...

Member
Lord Sentamu (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1228
House
House of Lords

I was about to make exactly the same point, but the noble and right reverend Lord beat me to it. The Minister has not addressed this point at all. The strongest argument against the day-one issue is that employers plainly will not take the risk with ex-offenders, who we are...

Member
Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1228
House
House of Lords

Sadly, I have not got through my contribution in response to all the questions, so please give me a bit of time. I will certainly address that specific question when I get to it.

The general point on day-one rights that we are trying to make—my noble friend made it very...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1228-9
House
House of Lords

Ex-offenders.

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1229
House
House of Lords

Yes, it was on ex-offenders. I certainly saw a page on that and will hopefully get to it soon. I will repeat the point I am making: the probationary period is an opportunity to ensure that people can retain a job.

There we go; I knew I had the page somewhere...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1229
House
House of Lords

No.

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1229
House
House of Lords

Two questions were posed to me: one was about the employment of offenders and one was about young people. Am I not answering the right question?

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1229
House
House of Lords

We seem to be missing the point somewhat. The point is that, if this day-one unfair dismissal right comes in, the person will not be employed in the first place. It is not that they will be fired afterwards; it is that the employer will not feel able to take...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1229
House
House of Lords

If you have a spent conviction, you do not have to disclose it, so I do not understand the point that the noble Lord is making. I challenge noble Lords on their experience. The noble Baroness, Lady Neville-Rolfe, sitting opposite me— I am sorry to name her in person—worked with...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1229
House
House of Lords

I think we need to consider the position of SMEs, as well as big employers such as Tesco. I cannot speak for Tesco any more, but

it contributed to a letter that was sent to us all, and everybody was concerned on this point. Some of this probationary stuff has...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1229
House
House of Lords

Well, I wish I had heard the noble Baroness say that when she was a Minister and many other Bills were being pushed through in recent years and we did not have statutory instruments. A classic case that noble Lords here will remember was the minimum service level Bill that...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1230
House
House of Lords

No!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1230
House
House of Lords

Well, I would argue very strongly that it does. I come back to the point—and I make it strongly—that the noble Lord, Lord Sharpe, and his party increased the qualifying period. It started at six months, then went to one year and then two years; now he is saying six...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1230
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the Minister. I come very late to this discussion, but what does influence my mind is the Resolution Foundation. Could I ask the Minister what his answer to that is?

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1230
House
House of Lords

I thought I had made my response. This is what we are trying to do: where there are specific concerns, we can address them in the secondary legislation. We have said that a probationary period of nine months would ensure that those companies and businesses have three or six months...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1230
House
House of Lords

Maybe the Minister could respond to this. There are more opponents to these parts of the Bill than just the party opposite,

as the Minister described them. All the concerns that have been raised—across the House, but also outside this House—have come from a wide range of organisations and interests...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1230-1
House
House of Lords

I would argue very strongly that the focus of our efforts is about what is good for this country, and what is good for this country is economic growth and what will stimulate that growth, for which creating a secure and flexible workforce is a key ingredient. I admire the...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1231
House
House of Lords

My Lords, pick the bones out of that, if you wish. There is quite a lot to respond to there, to which I will not completely respond, but I think it characterises that this is an unusual ping-pong. Usually, most of it is cut and dried, and it is down...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1231-2
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Collins of Highbury

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1232
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Leong

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1236
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Motion C, I will speak to Motions K, K1, N and N1. In this group, we will be debating amendments made in this House relating to special constables, heritage railway volunteers and the school support staff negotiating body. The Government have listened carefully and openly to...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1236-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can be very brief because the Minister has brought glad tidings. I thank him very much for that and for the way that he set out this debate.

As noble Lords who followed this narrow but important issue will know, this confusion stems from the question of how...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1237-1240
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am almost lost for words. As the noble Lord, Lord Parkinson, said, this campaign has been running for almost 15 years. The first stage was when I took a Private Member’s Bill through your Lordships’ House to attempt to address the problems of the 1920 Act. It...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1240
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in addressing Motion C, I thank the Government for their amendment. The noble Lord, Lord Katz, in particular, has been very patient and has provided us with his time. He has responded to an issue that was first raised by Sir Ashley Fox in the Commons, when one...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1240
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I feel in a lonely position in not being able to thank the Government for their comments on my amendment. I feel sad that I have to speak again, as I hoped that the Government would have talked to those running our schools and trusts and would have...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1241-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak in support of Motion N1 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, and declare that I am still a teacher in a state secondary school in Hackney, east London.

In over 10 years of teaching, I have encountered tens—maybe not hundreds—of TAs, technicians, IT staff,...

Member
Lord Hampton (Crossbench; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1242-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very briefly, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Hogan-Howe, on making progress, along with the cosignatories of that amendment. I also congratulate the noble Lords, Lord Faulkner and Lord Parkinson, who have realised a lifelong dream of putting children back to work on the railways.

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1243
House
House of Lords

Oh!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1243
House
House of Lords

Less—or more—prosaically, the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, has set out the issues here doggedly and in detail. I still feel that we are in a “he said, she said” situation, and it is extremely difficult to unpick how this will work. I assume—I am sure—that the statutory instruments and the...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1243
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Fox, in congratulating the noble Lord, Lord Hogan-Howe, on the progress he has made on a very valid point he raised earlier in these debates. I also say to my noble friend Lord Parkinson and the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner: my goodness,...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1243
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords for their thoughtful contributions to today’s debate. The debate has been wide ranging, from special constables and heritage railways to the SSSNB. I am grateful for everyone’s valuable insight. I will address the points raised by all noble Lords.

On Motion C,...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1243-4
House
House of Lords

On the noble Lord’s last point about employers being able to retain their existing contracts, in the letter I received from the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Smith of Malvern, on 1 September, she writes in relation to that specific point:

“As set out above, a term of an employee’s contract...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1244
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for that. I must admit that I have not had a chance to look at my noble friend Lady Smith’s letter. As far as

I know and have been told, employers will be able to retain contracts for their employees that contain more favourable terms...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1244
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to intervene again on the Minister, but I asked this question specifically of the noble Baronesses, Lady Jones and Lady Smith, because that is what employers are worried about: that their existing staff will suffer as a result of this. I think the noble Baroness’s letter is...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1245
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for that. I will make sure that I read the letter and will ask my officials to confirm in writing for her.

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1245
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Lloyd of Effra

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1245
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak also to Motions F and J. I first come to Motion D, on non-disclosure agreements, also known as NDAs. In the other place, the Government proposed two minor amendments to the clause on NDAs. The first will extend the scope of the clause to include...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1245-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Collins of Highbury

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
849 c1246
House
House of Lords