Skip to main content

21-40 of 8,338 results for subject:Managers

Type

-
Early day motions (34)
+ Legislation (21) + Acts (4)
-
Public acts (4)
+ Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (6)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (3)
+ Delegated legislation (10)
-
Statutory instruments (10)
+ Members' contributions (5,326)
-
Business questions (39)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (370)
-
Oral corrections (1)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (384)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (4,566)
+ Parliamentary committees (101) + Committee proceedings (63)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Select Committee reports (13)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (24)
+ Parliamentary papers (221)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (4)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (3)
-
Deposited papers (165)
-
House of Commons papers (43)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (246) + Debates (120)
-
Adjournment debates (10)
-
Backbench debates (5)
+ Committee proceedings (63)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (71)
-
Debates on bills (70)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (4)
-
Questions for short debate (5)
+ Formal proceedings (2)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (117) + Oral statements (31)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (28)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (86)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (2,901)
-
Business questions (39)
+ Oral questions (384)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (2,475)
+ Research briefings (15) + Commons Briefing papers (6)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (3)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank noble Lords for their amendments in this group. We have spoken previously about the importance of effectiveness, proportionality and clarity. I absolutely hear the experience of the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, in leading a telecommunications company and the experience it had.

We have learned from experiences across all sectors...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc105-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, stands up, I heard what the Minister had to say about consulting across sectors. I was reminded that, at Second Reading, I mentioned the fact that the law firm with which I am associated, DLA Piper, was subjected to a NotPetya ransomware...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc106-7GC
House
House of Lords

I think we all agree that we want a proportionate and clear regime. The noble Lord supports further incident reporting here—additional stages of incident reporting. In our impact assessment, we clearly set out the implications of that in its cost to business and so on. We will come on shortly...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c107GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened really carefully to the Minister and thank her for her response, but I feel that we just had a completely black and white no, which is extremely disappointing. We have had something almost worse than a black and white no, because if I heard her...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c107GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Lloyd of Effra

19: Clause 15, page 22, line 14, leave out “users of”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would require an operator of an essential service to consider whether any data relating to the essential service has been compromised (not just data relating to users of the service) when determining...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c107GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Lloyd of Effra

36: Clause 15, page 26, line 31, leave out “users of”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would require a relevant digital service provider to consider whether any data relating to the relevant digital service has been compromised (not just data relating to users of the service) when determining...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c107GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Lloyd of Effra

44: Clause 15, page 30, line 4, leave out “users of”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would require a relevant managed service provider to consider whether any data relating to the relevant managed service has been compromised (not just data relating to users of the service) when determining...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c107GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Harding of Winscombe

51: Clause 16, page 32, line 34, leave out “as soon as reasonably practicable” and insert “without delay and in any event within 24 hours of becoming aware of the incident”

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c107GC
House
House of Lords

I apologise, I stand to speak to a whole other group of amendments that suffer from the same challenge of needing to be repeated four times, which is why I suggested to the clerks that we degroup them, otherwise we would have got into a real muddle.

This group seeks to...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc107-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for reasons that I do not understand, I do not have my name on these amendments, given all the others from the noble Baroness that I do, but I support them. It is funny, because when I came back from holiday in August, I had no fewer than...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c109GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support all these amendments. They bring the customer perspective well into focus, which the Bill is currently chronically insufficient on, in my view. As the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, identified, if these amendments do not quite get to the precision of it, how will the Government bring...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c109GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support these customer notification amendments tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Harding of Winscombe. As I have said, the noble Baroness brings vital lived experience, in more ways than I thought, from the front line of corporate crisis response. When a major cyber breach occurs, vague...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c110GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank my noble friend Lady Harding of Winscombe for tabling this important set of amendments, which we welcome, and for clarifying the refinements of the grouping process, which had slightly eluded me up to that point. As with the previous group, this would amend four key...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc110-1GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for raising important points around customer communication. As set out in the Bill, it takes forward the current duties to notify customers that the Bill places on data centres, OESs, RDSPs and RMSPs. That duty was designed to ensure that providers of key digital and...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c111GC
House
House of Lords

I thank all the noble Lords who, again, have supported my long list of amendments and I thank them for their excellent

contributions. It feels as if we made a very small breakthrough, for which I am extremely grateful, and I thank the Minister. I will not delay anyone any...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c111GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Harding of Winscombe

72: After Clause 16, insert the following new Clause—

“Notification of near misses, cyber threats and sub-threshold incidents

After regulation 14G of the NIS Regulations (inserted by section 16) insert—

“Notification of near misses, cyber threats and sub-threshold incidents

(1) A regulated person must notify the designated competent authority without...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc112-3GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry, it is me again. In a break with tradition, we have only one amendment in this group. That is because this amendment would insert a proposed new clause, as opposed to lots of small changes to existing clauses. Amendment 72 is in my name and, once again,...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c113GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 72 and I have signed it. I recognise the probing nature of this, but I also recognise the problem

it seeks to address. The knowledge that a cyber threat or cyber attack has failed may be incredibly important intelligence because, on the whole, someone trying...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc113-4GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, support the amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, as I do all the amendments previously discussed. By definition, a near miss means a severe threat narrowly avoided that would have had substantial consequences if it had not been avoided. The interesting thing is that everyone tells me...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c114GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this amendment, particularly in terms of its probing nature and what work can potentially be done between Committee and Report in this respect. It is really about the question of mandation. There should not be any question of a voluntary requirement. This is something that is...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c114GC
House
House of Lords